John Humphreys1, John Wakerman2. 1. Monash University School of Rural Health, Strathdale, Victoria, Australia. 2. Flinders Northern Territory, Flinders University, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This article describes the rationale for, and development of, an evidence-based rural typology as the basis for an incentive scheme to improve medical workforce retention. This case study describes the key factors associated with ensuring that research evidence is translated into rural health policy and program implementation. DESIGN: Case study. SETTING: Rural and remote Australia. RESULTS: The development and implementation of the Modified Monash Model in Australia demonstrates some of the key facilitators of knowledge exchange. These include: sound evidence based on good empirical data and rigorous methodology; transparency to peers and stakeholders; the importance of long-term commitment to rural health research; the credibility of the researcher; multiple modes of communication of results; real world validation and amplification of results; patience and persistence underscored by the commitment of researchers to achieving more equitable outcomes for rural and remote doctors; serendipity in terms of timing; and a governmental culture that values evidence-based outcomes. CONCLUSION: The knowledge exchange process is neither easy nor simple and rarely rapid. It often requires the engagement of communities, professional associations, health care providers, researchers, policy-makers and funders. Implementation of evidence into rural health policies and programs benefits all parties through significant improvements in efficiency, effectiveness and equity.
OBJECTIVE: This article describes the rationale for, and development of, an evidence-based rural typology as the basis for an incentive scheme to improve medical workforce retention. This case study describes the key factors associated with ensuring that research evidence is translated into rural health policy and program implementation. DESIGN: Case study. SETTING: Rural and remote Australia. RESULTS: The development and implementation of the Modified Monash Model in Australia demonstrates some of the key facilitators of knowledge exchange. These include: sound evidence based on good empirical data and rigorous methodology; transparency to peers and stakeholders; the importance of long-term commitment to rural health research; the credibility of the researcher; multiple modes of communication of results; real world validation and amplification of results; patience and persistence underscored by the commitment of researchers to achieving more equitable outcomes for rural and remote doctors; serendipity in terms of timing; and a governmental culture that values evidence-based outcomes. CONCLUSION: The knowledge exchange process is neither easy nor simple and rarely rapid. It often requires the engagement of communities, professional associations, health care providers, researchers, policy-makers and funders. Implementation of evidence into rural health policies and programs benefits all parties through significant improvements in efficiency, effectiveness and equity.
Authors: Sandra C Thompson; Lee Nedkoff; Judith Katzenellenbogen; Mohammad Akhtar Hussain; Frank Sanfilippo Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2019-12-15 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Carlos I Mesa-Castrillon; Milena Simic; Manuela L Ferreira; Kristy Hatswell; Georgina Luscombe; Antonio Michell de Gregorio; Phillip R Davis; Adrian Bauman; Stephen Bunker; Ornella Clavisi; Grahame Knox; Kim L Bennell; Paulo H Ferreira Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 2.362