H Hebelka1,2, L Torén3,4, K Lagerstrand5,4, H Brisby6,4. 1. Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. hanna.hebelka@vgregion.se. 2. Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. hanna.hebelka@vgregion.se. 3. Department of Radiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. 4. Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. 5. Department of Medical Physics and Techniques, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. 6. Department of Orthopaedics, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate differences in functional intervertebral disk (IVD) characteristics between low back pain (LBP) patients and controls using T2-mapping with axial loading during MRI (alMRI). METHODS: In total, 120 IVDs in 24 LBP patients (mean age 39 years, range 25-69) were examined with T2-mapping without loading of the spine (uMRI) and with alMRI (DynaWell® loading device) and compared with 60 IVDs in 12 controls (mean age 38 years, range 25-63). The IVD T2-value was acquired after 20-min loading in five regions of interests (ROI), ROI1-5 from anterior to posterior. T2-values were compared between loading states and cohorts with adjustment for Pfirrmann grade. RESULTS: In LBP patients, mean T2-value of the entire IVD was 64 ms for uMRI and 66 ms for alMRI (p = 0.03) and, in controls, 65 ms and 65 ms (p = 0.5). Load-induced T2-differences (alMRI-uMRI) were seen in all ROIs in both patients (0.001 > p < 0.005) and controls (0.0001 > p < 0.03). In patients, alMRI induced an increase in T2-value for ROI1-3 (23%, 18% and 5%) and a decrease for ROI4 (3%) and ROI5 (24%). More pronounced load-induced decrease was detected in ROI4 in controls (9%/p = 0.03), while a higher absolute T2-value was found for ROI5 during alMRI in patients (38 ms) compared to controls (33 ms) (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The alMRI-induced differences in T2-value in ROI4 and ROI5 between patients and controls most probably indicate biomechanical impairment in the posterior IVD regions. Hence, alMRI combined with T2-mapping offers an objective and clinical feasible tool for biomechanical IVD characterization that may deepen the knowledge regarding how LBP is related to altered IVD matrix composition. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
PURPOSE: To investigate differences in functional intervertebral disk (IVD) characteristics between low back pain (LBP) patients and controls using T2-mapping with axial loading during MRI (alMRI). METHODS: In total, 120 IVDs in 24 LBP patients (mean age 39 years, range 25-69) were examined with T2-mapping without loading of the spine (uMRI) and with alMRI (DynaWell® loading device) and compared with 60 IVDs in 12 controls (mean age 38 years, range 25-63). The IVD T2-value was acquired after 20-min loading in five regions of interests (ROI), ROI1-5 from anterior to posterior. T2-values were compared between loading states and cohorts with adjustment for Pfirrmann grade. RESULTS: In LBP patients, mean T2-value of the entire IVD was 64 ms for uMRI and 66 ms for alMRI (p = 0.03) and, in controls, 65 ms and 65 ms (p = 0.5). Load-induced T2-differences (alMRI-uMRI) were seen in all ROIs in both patients (0.001 > p < 0.005) and controls (0.0001 > p < 0.03). In patients, alMRI induced an increase in T2-value for ROI1-3 (23%, 18% and 5%) and a decrease for ROI4 (3%) and ROI5 (24%). More pronounced load-induced decrease was detected in ROI4 in controls (9%/p = 0.03), while a higher absolute T2-value was found for ROI5 during alMRI in patients (38 ms) compared to controls (33 ms) (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The alMRI-induced differences in T2-value in ROI4 and ROI5 between patients and controls most probably indicate biomechanical impairment in the posterior IVD regions. Hence, alMRI combined with T2-mapping offers an objective and clinical feasible tool for biomechanical IVD characterization that may deepen the knowledge regarding how LBP is related to altered IVD matrix composition. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Entities:
Keywords:
Axial loading during MRI; Intervertebral disk; Low back pain; MRI; T2-mapping
Authors: Peter G Passias; Shaobai Wang; Michal Kozanek; Qun Xia; Weishi Li; Brian Grottkau; Kirkham B Wood; Guoan Li Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2011-01-05 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Arin M Ellingson; Hitesh Mehta; David W Polly; Jutta Ellermann; David J Nuckley Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2013-11-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Ghislain Maquer; Vaclav Brandejsky; Lorin M Benneker; Atsuya Watanabe; Peter Vermathen; Philippe K Zysset Journal: Med Eng Phys Date: 2013-12-03 Impact factor: 2.242
Authors: H Hebelka; K Lagerstrand; H Brisby; P J Owen; M J Quittner; T Rantalainen; D L Belavy Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2019-07-12 Impact factor: 3.134