Literature DB >> 30301874

Impact of decision aids used during clinical encounters on clinician outcomes and consultation length: a systematic review.

Claudia Caroline Dobler1,2, Manuel Sanchez2, Michael R Gionfriddo3, Neri A Alvarez-Villalobos2,4, Naykky Singh Ospina2,5, Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla2, Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir6,7, Raed Benkhadra6, Patricia J Erwin8, Colin P West9,10, Juan P Brito2, Mohammad Hassan Murad6, Victor M Montori2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinicians' satisfaction with encounter decision aids is an important component in facilitating implementation of these tools. We aimed to determine the impact of decision aids supporting shared decision making (SDM) during the clinical encounter on clinician outcomes.
METHODS: We searched nine databases from inception to June 2017. Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of decision aids used during clinical encounters with an unaided control group were eligible for inclusion. Due to heterogeneity among included studies, we used a narrative evidence synthesis approach.
RESULTS: Twenty-five papers met inclusion criteria including 22 RCTs and 3 qualitative or mixed-methods studies nested in an RCT, together representing 23 unique trials. These trials evaluated healthcare decisions for cardiovascular prevention and treatment (n=8), treatment of diabetes mellitus (n=3), treatment of osteoporosis (n=2), treatment of depression (n=2), antibiotics to treat acute respiratory infections (n=3), cancer prevention and treatment (n=4) and prenatal diagnosis (n=1). Clinician outcomes were measured in only a minority of studies. Clinicians' satisfaction with decision making was assessed in only 8 (and only 2 of them showed statistically significantly greater satisfaction with the decision aid); only three trials asked if clinicians would recommend the decision aid to colleagues and only five asked if clinicians would use decision aids in the future. Outpatient consultations were not prolonged when a decision aid was used in 9 out of 13 trials. The overall strength of the evidence was low, with the major risk of bias related to lack of blinding of participants and/or outcome assessors.
CONCLUSION: Decision aids can improve clinicians' satisfaction with medical decision making and provide helpful information without affecting length of consultation time. Most SDM trials, however, omit outcomes related to clinicians' perspective on the decision making process or the likelihood of using a decision aid in the future. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  communication; health services research; shared decision making

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30301874      PMCID: PMC6561726          DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  44 in total

Review 1.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.

Authors:  M D Cabana; C S Rand; N R Powe; A W Wu; M H Wilson; P A Abboud; H R Rubin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-10-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Decision Aid for Cigarette Smokers Scheduled for Elective Surgery.

Authors:  David O Warner; Annie LeBlanc; Sandeep Kadimpati; Kristin S Vickers; Yu Shi; Victor M Montori
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Effects of a patient oriented decision aid for prioritising treatment goals in diabetes: pragmatic randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Petra Denig; Jan Schuling; Flora Haaijer-Ruskamp; Jaco Voorham
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-09-25

4.  Use of a decision aid to improve treatment decisions in osteoporosis: the osteoporosis choice randomized trial.

Authors:  Victor M Montori; Nilay D Shah; Laurie J Pencille; Megan E Branda; Holly K Van Houten; Brian A Swiglo; Rebecca L Kesman; Sidna M Tulledge-Scheitel; Thomas M Jaeger; Ruth E Johnson; Gregory A Bartel; L Joseph Melton; Robert A Wermers
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  PCI Choice Decision Aid for Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Megan Coylewright; Sara Dick; Becky Zmolek; Jason Askelin; Edward Hawkins; Megan Branda; Jonathan W Inselman; Claudia Zeballos-Palacios; Nilay D Shah; Erik P Hess; Annie LeBlanc; Victor M Montori; Henry H Ting
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2016-11-01

6.  The diabetes mellitus medication choice decision aid: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Rebecca J Mullan; Victor M Montori; Nilay D Shah; Teresa J H Christianson; Sandra C Bryant; Gordon H Guyatt; Lilisbeth I Perestelo-Perez; Robert J Stroebel; Barbara P Yawn; Victor Yapuncich; Maggie A Breslin; Laurie Pencille; Steven A Smith
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-28

7.  Applying decision analysis to facilitate informed decision making about prenatal diagnosis for Down syndrome: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Hilary L Bekker; Jenny Hewison; Jim G Thornton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.050

8.  A treatment decision aid may increase patient trust in the diabetes specialist. The Statin Choice randomized trial.

Authors:  Michael R Nannenga; Victor M Montori; Audrey J Weymiller; Steven A Smith; Teresa J H Christianson; Sandra C Bryant; Amiram Gafni; Cathy Charles; Rebecca J Mullan; Lesley A Jones; Enrique R Bolona; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.377

9.  Implementing shared decision making in the NHS: lessons from the MAGIC programme.

Authors:  Natalie Joseph-Williams; Amy Lloyd; Adrian Edwards; Lynne Stobbart; David Tomson; Sheila Macphail; Carole Dodd; Kate Brain; Glyn Elwyn; Richard Thomson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-04-18

Review 10.  "Many miles to go …": a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Isabelle Scholl; Caroline Tietbohl; Mala Mann; Adrian G K Edwards; Catharine Clay; France Légaré; Trudy van der Weijden; Carmen L Lewis; Richard M Wexler; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 2.796

View more
  17 in total

Review 1.  Aspirin, Statins, and Primary Prevention: Opportunities for Shared Decision Making in the Face of Uncertainty.

Authors:  Amit Jhaveri; Rachel A Sibley; Erica S Spatz; John Dodson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 2.  Shared Decision Making in Cardiac Electrophysiology Procedures and Arrhythmia Management.

Authors:  Mina K Chung; Angela Fagerlin; Paul J Wang; Tinuola B Ajayi; Larry A Allen; Tina Baykaner; Emelia J Benjamin; Megan Branda; Kerri L Cavanaugh; Lin Y Chen; George H Crossley; Rebecca K Delaney; Lee L Eckhardt; Kathleen L Grady; Ian G Hargraves; Mellanie True Hills; Matthew M Kalscheur; Daniel B Kramer; Marleen Kunneman; Rachel Lampert; Aisha T Langford; Krystina B Lewis; Ying Lu; John M Mandrola; Kathryn Martinez; Daniel D Matlock; Sarah R McCarthy; Victor M Montori; Peter A Noseworthy; Kate M Orland; Elissa Ozanne; Rod Passman; Krishna Pundi; Dan M Roden; Elizabeth V Saarel; Monika M Schmidt; Samuel F Sears; Dawn Stacey; Randall S Stafford; Benjamin A Steinberg; Sojin Youn Wass; Jennifer M Wright
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2021-12-06

3.  Development and pilot testing of a conversation aid to support the evaluation of patients with thyroid nodules.

Authors:  Naykky M Singh Ospina; Diliara Bagautdinova; Ian Hargraves; Diana Barb; Sreevidya Subbarayan; Ashok Srihari; Shu Wang; Spyridoula Maraka; Carma L Bylund; Debbie Treise; Victor Montori; Juan P Brito
Journal:  Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 3.478

4.  Shared Decision-making in Different Types of Decisions in Medical Specialist Consultations.

Authors:  Ellen M Driever; Anne M Stiggelbout; Paul L P Brand
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 6.473

Review 5.  Pregnant pause: should we screen for sleep disordered breathing in pregnancy?

Authors:  Alex Perkins; Alys Einion
Journal:  Breathe (Sheff)       Date:  2019-03

6.  Treatment of stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: protocol for a systematic review and evidence map.

Authors:  Claudia C Dobler; Magdoleen H Farah; Allison S Morrow; Mouaz Alsawas; Raed Benkhadra; Bashar Hasan; Larry J Prokop; Zhen Wang; M Hassan Murad
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-05       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Implementation of the uterine fibroids Option Grid patient decision aids across five organizational settings: a randomized stepped-wedge study protocol.

Authors:  Peter Scalia; Marie-Anne Durand; Rachel C Forcino; Danielle Schubbe; Paul J Barr; Nancy O'Brien; A James O'Malley; Tina Foster; Mary C Politi; Shannon Laughlin-Tommaso; Erika Banks; Tessa Madden; Raymond M Anchan; Johanna W M Aarts; Priscilla Velentgas; Joyce Balls-Berry; Carla Bacon; Monica Adams-Foster; Carrie Cahill Mulligan; Sateria Venable; Nancy E Cochran; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2019-09-02       Impact factor: 7.327

8.  Explainability for artificial intelligence in healthcare: a multidisciplinary perspective.

Authors:  Julia Amann; Alessandro Blasimme; Effy Vayena; Dietmar Frey; Vince I Madai
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  The views of New Zealand general practitioners and patients on a proposed risk assessment and communication tool: a qualitative study using Normalisation Process Theory.

Authors:  Sharon Leitch; Alesha Smith; Sue Crengle; Tim Stokes
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2021-02-10

10.  Normalization of a conversation tool to promote shared decision making about anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation within a practical randomized trial of its effectiveness: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Gabriela Spencer-Bonilla; Anjali Thota; Paige Organick; Oscar J Ponce; Marleen Kunneman; Rachel Giblon; Megan E Branda; Angela L Sivly; Emma Behnken; Carl R May; Victor M Montori
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.