Literature DB >> 30301787

Preassembled GPCR signaling complexes mediate distinct cellular responses to ultralow ligand concentrations.

Srgjan Civciristov1, Andrew M Ellisdon2, Ryan Suderman3, Cindy K Pon1, Bronwyn A Evans1, Oded Kleifeld2,4, Steven J Charlton5,6, William S Hlavacek3, Meritxell Canals1, Michelle L Halls7.   

Abstract

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest class of cell surface signaling proteins, participate in nearly all physiological processes, and are the targets of 30% of marketed drugs. Typically, nanomolar to micromolar concentrations of ligand are used to activate GPCRs in experimental systems. We detected GPCR responses to a wide range of ligand concentrations, from attomolar to millimolar, by measuring GPCR-stimulated production of cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) with high spatial and temporal resolution. Mathematical modeling showed that femtomolar concentrations of ligand activated, on average, 40% of the cells in a population provided that a cell was activated by one to two binding events. Furthermore, activation of the endogenous β2-adrenergic receptor (β2AR) and muscarinic acetylcholine M3 receptor (M3R) by femtomolar concentrations of ligand in cell lines and human cardiac fibroblasts caused sustained increases in nuclear translocation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and cytosolic protein kinase C (PKC) activity, respectively. These responses were spatially and temporally distinct from those that occurred in response to higher concentrations of ligand and resulted in a distinct cellular proteomic profile. This highly sensitive signaling depended on the GPCRs forming preassembled, higher-order signaling complexes at the plasma membrane. Recognizing that GPCRs respond to ultralow concentrations of neurotransmitters and hormones challenges established paradigms of drug action and provides a previously unappreciated aspect of GPCR activation that is quite distinct from that typically observed with higher ligand concentrations.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. No claim to original U.S. Government Works.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30301787     DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.aan1188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Signal        ISSN: 1945-0877            Impact factor:   8.192


  12 in total

Review 1.  Signalling in response to sub-picomolar concentrations of active compounds: Pushing the boundaries of GPCR sensitivity.

Authors:  Srgjan Civciristov; Michelle L Halls
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 8.739

2.  Delineation of molecular determinants for FR900359 inhibition of Gq/11 unlocks inhibition of Gαs.

Authors:  Michael W Boesgaard; Kasper Harpsøe; Michelle Malmberg; Christina R Underwood; Asuka Inoue; Jesper M Mathiesen; Gabriele M König; Evi Kostenis; David E Gloriam; Hans Bräuner-Osborne
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 3.  Ultra low doses and biological amplification: Approaching Avogadro's number.

Authors:  Edward J Calabrese; James Giordano
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 10.334

4.  Adenosine mechanisms and hypersensitive corticostriatal terminals in restless legs syndrome. Rationale for the use of inhibitors of adenosine transport.

Authors:  Sergi Ferré; César Quiroz; William Rea; Xavier Guitart; Diego García-Borreguero
Journal:  Adv Pharmacol       Date:  2019-01-18

5.  Ligand-dependent spatiotemporal signaling profiles of the μ-opioid receptor are controlled by distinct protein-interaction networks.

Authors:  Srgjan Civciristov; Cheng Huang; Bonan Liu; Elsa A Marquez; Arisbel B Gondin; Ralf B Schittenhelm; Andrew M Ellisdon; Meritxell Canals; Michelle L Halls
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  β-blockers augment L-type Ca2+ channel activity by targeting spatially restricted β2AR signaling in neurons.

Authors:  Ao Shen; Dana Chen; Manpreet Kaur; Peter Bartels; Bing Xu; Qian Shi; Joseph M Martinez; Kwun-Nok Mimi Man; Madeline Nieves-Cintron; Johannes W Hell; Manuel F Navedo; Xi-Yong Yu; Yang K Xiang
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  α2-Adrenergic Disruption of β Cell BDNF-TrkB Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Signaling.

Authors:  Michael A Kalwat; Zhimin Huang; Derk D Binns; Kathleen McGlynn; Melanie H Cobb
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-10-15

8.  Identification of Gain and Loss of Function Missense Variants in MRGPRX2's Transmembrane and Intracellular Domains for Mast Cell Activation by Substance P.

Authors:  Chalatip Chompunud Na Ayudhya; Saptarshi Roy; Ibrahim Alkanfari; Anirban Ganguly; Hydar Ali
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 6.208

9.  The G protein database, GproteinDb.

Authors:  Gáspár Pándy-Szekeres; Mauricio Esguerra; Alexander S Hauser; Jimmy Caroli; Christian Munk; Steven Pilger; György M Keserű; Albert J Kooistra; David E Gloriam
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  High-mass MALDI-MS unravels ligand-mediated G protein-coupling selectivity to GPCRs.

Authors:  Na Wu; Agnieszka M Olechwier; Cyrill Brunner; Patricia C Edwards; Ching-Ju Tsai; Christopher G Tate; Gebhard F X Schertler; Gisbert Schneider; Xavier Deupi; Renato Zenobi; Pikyee Ma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.