Literature DB >> 30301695

Prognostic Implication of the United States Food and Drug Administration-defined BCG-unresponsive Disease.

Roger Li1, William B Tabayoyong1, Charles C Guo2, Graciela M Nogueras González3, Neema Navai1, H Barton Grossman1, Colin P Dinney1, Ashish M Kamat4.   

Abstract

The category "BCG-unresponsive disease", formulated by experts at the request of the United States Food and Drug Administration, denotes a group of patients with recurrent non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer for whom continued BCG treatment is unlikely to provide benefit. Although quickly adopted for trial design, many of the nuances within the definition lack validation. In this study, we evaluated the prognostic value of BCG unresponsive designation (i.e. recurrence after induction plus at least 1 maintenance course of BCG) by comparing the oncologic outcomes of these patients with those recurring after induction BCG alone. We confirm that appropriately defined, BCG-unresponsive patients are more likely to require salvage radical cystectomy (54.5% vs 17.9%, p=0.002). Moreover, those opting for second-line bladder-sparing therapies are less likely to remain free of tumor recurrence (23% vs 69.2%, p=0.003). On multivariate analysis, BCG-unresponsive disease independently predicts inferior high-grade recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 6.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.27-16.67; p<0.001) and cystectomy-free survival (HR: 3.85, 95% CI: 1.49-10.0; p=0.006). Our data confirm the prognostic implication of the BCG unresponsive definition i.e. recurrence of high grade disease after induction and one course of maintenance BCG, and support its use in counseling and risk stratification of patients with tumor recurrence after BCG. Patient summary: Patients who have BCG-unresponsive disease, that is, high-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer recurring after BCG induction and maintenance, have a low likelihood to respond to further BCG treatment and should consider radical cystectomy or clinical trial enrollment.
Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCG; BCG-unresponsive disease; Bladder cancer; Intravesical therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30301695     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  7 in total

1.  Intravesical Pseudomonas aeruginosa mannose-sensitive Hemagglutinin vaccine triggers a tumor-preventing immune environment in an orthotopic mouse bladder cancer model.

Authors:  Bo Wang; Zhihua He; Hao Yu; Ziwei Ou; Junyu Chen; Meihua Yang; Xinxiang Fan; Tianxin Lin; Jian Huang
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2021-10-31       Impact factor: 6.968

2.  Systematic Review of the Therapeutic Efficacy of Bladder-preserving Treatments for Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Following Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin.

Authors:  Roger Li; Debasish Sundi; Jingsong Zhang; Youngchul Kim; Richard J Sylvester; Philippe E Spiess; Michael A Poch; Wade J Sexton; Peter C Black; James M McKiernan; Gary D Steinberg; Ashish M Kamat; Scott M Gilbert
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Intravesical nadofaragene firadenovec gene therapy for BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a single-arm, open-label, repeat-dose clinical trial.

Authors:  Stephen A Boorjian; Mehrdad Alemozaffar; Badrinath R Konety; Neal D Shore; Leonard G Gomella; Ashish M Kamat; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Seth P Lerner; Joseph E Busby; Michael Poch; Paul L Crispen; Gary D Steinberg; Anne K Schuckman; Tracy M Downs; Robert S Svatek; Joseph Mashni; Brian R Lane; Thomas J Guzzo; Gennady Bratslavsky; Lawrence I Karsh; Michael E Woods; Gordon Brown; Daniel Canter; Adam Luchey; Yair Lotan; Tracey Krupski; Brant A Inman; Michael B Williams; Michael S Cookson; Kirk A Keegan; Gerald L Andriole; Alexander I Sankin; Alan Boyd; Michael A O'Donnell; David Sawutz; Richard Philipson; Ruth Coll; Vikram M Narayan; F Peter Treasure; Seppo Yla-Herttuala; Nigel R Parker; Colin P N Dinney
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 4.  Updates on the use of intravesical therapies for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: how, when and what.

Authors:  Charles C Peyton; Juan Chipollini; Mounsif Azizi; Ashish M Kamat; Scott M Gilbert; Phillippe E Spiess
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Pharmacologic Therapies for Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Current and Future Treatments.

Authors:  Ilana P Goldberg; Benjamin Lichtbroun; Eric A Singer; Saum Ghodoussipour
Journal:  Arch Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022

Review 6.  Improving Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy for Localized Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Florus C de Jong; Vera C Rutten; Tahlita C M Zuiverloon; Dan Theodorescu
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  The Use of Urine Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Polymerase Chain Reaction as a Predictive Factor for Recurrence and Progression After Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Therapy in Patients with Non-muscle‑invasive Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Satoru Muto; Yan Lu; Hisamitsu Ide; Raizo Yamaguchi; Keisuke Saito; Kousuke Kitamura; Yasuhiro Noma; Hiroki Koyasu; Hisashi Hirano; Takeshi Ashizawa; Shuji Isotani; Masayoshi Nagata; Shigeo Horie
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2021-03-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.