Literature DB >> 30301690

Outcomes associated with a transcarotid artery revascularization-centered protocol in high-risk carotid revascularizations using the ENROUTE neuroprotection system.

S Keisin Wang1, Andres Fajardo1, Alan P Sawchuk1, Gary W Lemmon1, Michael C Dalsing1, Alok K Gupta1, Michael P Murphy1, Raghu L Motaganahalli2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This investigation describes the perioperative and early follow-up results associated with transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) in patients not participating in the Safety and Efficacy Study for Reverse Flow Used During Carotid Artery Stenting Procedure II (ROADSTER-2) registry using the ENROUTE neuroprotection system (ENPS; Silk Road Medical, Sunnyvale, Calif).
METHODS: A retrospective review was performed capturing all TCAR/ENPS procedures in patients deemed to be at high risk for complications after traditional carotid endarterectomy. All patients enrolled in the ROADSTER-2 registry were excluded, leaving only those treated outside trial regulations for analysis. Preoperative demographics, intraoperative variables, and perioperative and follow-up outcomes were abstracted and reported herein.
RESULTS: From December 2015 to January 2018, there were 75 carotid arteries treated at our institution. All interventions were performed on carotid arteries that were symptomatic with ≥50% stenosis (46.7%) or asymptomatic with ≥80% stenosis (53.3%) by duplex ultrasound and computed tomography angiography. Technical success in our series was 97.3% (73/75), with treatment failures attributed to one case of common carotid artery dissection and another secondary to stent maldeployment in the external carotid artery. Perioperative (30-day) ipsilateral stroke rate was 2.7% (n = 2), myocardial infarction incidence was 0%, and mortality rate was 2.7% (n = 2). We did not observe any cranial nerve injuries. After a mean follow-up of 8.0 ± 6.7 months, no carotid stents required reintervention. However, we noted one instance of minor (<50%) in-stent stenosis and one asymptomatic stent thrombosis. One additional ipsilateral stroke was observed on follow-up, probably from a cardiac source.
CONCLUSIONS: We report that dynamic reverse-flow TCAR using the ENPS continues to be safe, feasible, and efficacious with minimal risks of postoperative stroke, myocardial infarction, and mortality outside of ROADSTER-2 regulations.
Copyright © 2018 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carotid revascularization; ENROUTE; Reverse flow; Stenting; Stroke; TCAR

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30301690     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  2 in total

1.  The utility of adjunctive electroencephalography while performing transcarotid artery revascularization.

Authors:  Drew J Braet; Naveen Balasundaram; Tiffany S Meller; Jonathan Bath; Todd R Vogel
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2019-11-09

2.  Intravascular lithotripsy during transcarotid arterial revascularization for highly calcified lesions in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Christopher L Henry; Spencer K Hansen; Cara E Gable; Bradley R Grimsley; Dennis R Gable
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2020-11-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.