Literature DB >> 30301651

Relapse tendency after BSSO surgery differs between 2D and 3D measurements: A validation study.

Yi Sun1, Lei Tian2, Heinz-Theo Luebbers3, Constantinus Politis4.   

Abstract

Bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) surgery is used to correct various dento-skeletal deformities. Clinical outcomes are critically dependent on accurate and proper positioning of skeletal units created by BSSO. Monitoring skeletal changes postoperatively is a major part of follow-up. Between January 2015 and December 2015, 24 patients underwent BSSO surgery without any other segmental osteotomy (mean age, 29.9 ± 14.2 [range, 17-67] years; 18 females). Cephalometric X-rays and cone-beam computed tomography scans were performed 6 weeks and 12 months postoperatively. We compared the position displacement at three mandibular points at both postoperative time points using 2- and 3-dimensional analysis separately and examined the relationship between these methods. Horizontally in at least in 14/24 patients, the difference between 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional measurements was >1 mm. Vertically in at least in 16/24 patients, the difference between 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional measurements was >1 mm. A scatter plot with orthogonal regression indicated the relationships between the 2-dimensional measurement and the corresponding 3-dimensional measurement in the horizontal and vertical directions. Skeletal relapse with 2-dimensional-measurements differed significantly from the 3-dimensional measurements. There was no evidence of a relationship between the two types of measurements regarding the direction and the location of the landmarks.
Copyright © 2018 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D cephalometry; 3D cephalometry; BSSO; Orthognathic surgery; Relapse; Validation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30301651     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2018.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  4 in total

Review 1.  3D Printing and Virtual Surgical Planning in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery.

Authors:  Adeeb Zoabi; Idan Redenski; Daniel Oren; Adi Kasem; Asaf Zigron; Shadi Daoud; Liad Moskovich; Fares Kablan; Samer Srouji
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-24       Impact factor: 4.964

2.  A computed tomography-based analysis of the structure of the mandible according to age and sex.

Authors:  Soyeon Jung; Hyunjong Yun; Chul Hoon Chung; Kuylhee Kim; Yongjoon Chang
Journal:  Arch Craniofac Surg       Date:  2022-06-20

3.  Complications or rather side effects? Quantification of patient satisfaction and complications after orthognathic surgery-a retrospective, cross-sectional long-term analysis.

Authors:  Daniel G E Thiem; Daniel Schneider; Michael Hammel; Bassam Saka; Bernhard Frerich; Bilal Al-Nawas; Peer W Kämmerer
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-11-06       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  The role of muscular traction in the occurrence of skeletal relapse after advancement bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO): A systematic review.

Authors:  Maxim Van den Bempt; Shankeeth Vinayahalingam; Michael D Han; Stefaan J Bergé; Tong Xi
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 2.563

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.