| Literature DB >> 30301248 |
Zulaiha Abdul Rahim1,2, Nor Azah Yusof3,4, Muhammad Aniq Shazni Mohammad Haniff5, Faruq Mohammad6, Mohd Ismahadi Syono7, Nurulhaidah Daud8.
Abstract
In the present work, we described the post-treatment effects of applying different plasma atmosphere conditions on the electrochemical performances of the multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). For the study, a composite of MWCNTs/Co/Ti was successfully grown on the silicon substrate and then pre-treated with ammonia, oxygen and hydrogen plasma. The composite was characterized by making use of field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) for the surface morphology and Raman spectroscopy for the functionalization. Further, the electrochemical measurements were performed with the use of the cyclic voltammetry (CV) applied in the 0.01 M potassium ferricyanide in 0.1 M KCl solution. On testing, the results indicated that the NH₃-treated MWCNTs have the highest efficiency as compared to the other pretreatments and control. This increased performance of NH₃ treated sample can be linked to the enhanced surface area of the composite, thereby improved adsorption and associated interaction with that of the analyte molecules at the electrodes. Further comparison of the electrode with that of commercial Dropsens electrodes provided the confirmation for the efficiency of the NH₃/MWCNTs, thereby suggesting for the potentiality of applying the NH₃ modified electrode towards electrochemical applications.Entities:
Keywords: Raman spectroscopy; cyclic voltammetry; multiwalled carbon nanotubes; plasma treatment
Year: 2018 PMID: 30301248 PMCID: PMC6213819 DOI: 10.3390/ma11101902
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Figure 1Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images representing the surface morphology of multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) (a) before any pre-treatment and following the treatment of (b) NH3, (c) H2 and (d) O2 (resolution: ×50,000).
Figure 2Comparison of the Raman spectra of as-grown MWCNTs with that of NH3, H2 and O2-plasma treated MWCNTs.
Raman spectra of bare and different plasma atmosphere treated MWCNTs.
| Type of MWCNTs | ID/IG Ratio | RSD (%) | I2D/IG | RSD (%) | I2D/ID | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As-grown MWCNTs | 0.998 | 2.545 | 0.225 | 2.545 | 0.125 | 4.421 |
| NH3/MWCNTs | 1.034 | 1.654 | 0.211 | 1.654 | 0.141 | 2.544 |
| H2/MWCNTs | 1.017 | 3.934 | 0.198 | 3.934 | 0.138 | 3.534 |
| O2/MWCNTs | 1.089 | 2.911 | 0.165 | 2.911 | 0.088 | 3.310 |
Figure 3Comparison between the cyclic voltammetries (CVs) of untreated and plasma treated MWCNTs at a scan rate of 20 mV s−1.
Peak current and potential of bare and plasma treated MWCNTs.
| MWCNTs Type | ipa/ipc | Epa (mV) | Epc (mV) | ∆P (mV) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| As grown MWCNTs | 1.003 | 340 | 122 | 218 |
| NH3/MWCNTs | 1.014 | 347 | 105 | 242 |
| H2/MWCNTs | 0.974 | 349 | 100 | 249 |
| O2/MWCNTs | 1.028 | 298 | 159 | 139 |
Figure 4Comparison of the CVs of (a) untreated MWCNTs, (b) H2/MWCNTs, (c) NH3/MWCNTs and (d) O2/MWCNTs in 0.01 M [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− at different scan rates in the range of 10–100 mVs−1.
Figure 5Plots of peak current against square root of scan rate of untreated and plasma-treated MWCNTs in 0.1 M KCl containing 0.01 M Fe(CN)63−/4− solution.
Electroactive surface areas of bare and plasma treated MWCNTs.
| MWCNTs Type | ipa | RSD (%) | ipc | RSD (%) | Correlation Coefficient ( | Effective Surface Area (cm²) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As-grown MWCNTs | 0.335 | 3.612 | −0.334 | 4.212 | 0.99561 | 0.32 |
| NH3/MWCNTs | 0.522 | 2.333 | −0.536 | 4.213 | 0.99516 | 0.50 |
| H2/MWCNTs | 0.504 | 2.301 | −0.517 | 3.312 | 0.97808 | 0.48 |
| O2/MWCNTs | 0.144 | 2.701 | −0.140 | 1.521 | 0.9702 | 0.14 |
Figure 6(a) Peak potential difference versus 1/square root of the scan rate, (b) multiple CVs of NH3/MWCNTs in 0.10 M KCl containing 0.01 M Fe(CN)63−/4− solution.
Figure 7CV comparison of NH3/MWCNT electrodes and commercial Dropsens electrodes (DRP-C110, DRP-C110-Au, DRP-C110-graphene, DRP-C110 Au NPs).