Literature DB >> 30300757

Modulation of associative learning in the hippocampal-striatal circuit based on item-set similarity.

Shauna M Stark1, Amy Frithsen1, Aaron T Mattfeld2, Craig E L Stark3.   

Abstract

Mounting evidence suggests that the medial temporal lobe (MTL) and striatal learning systems support different forms of learning, which can be competitive or cooperative depending on task demands. We have previously shown how activity in these regions can be modulated in a conditional visuomotor associative learning task based on the consistency of response mappings or reward feedback (Mattfeld & Stark, 2015). Here, we examined the shift in learning towards the MTL and away from the striatum by placing strong demands on pattern separation, a process of orthogonalizing similar inputs into distinct representations. Mnemonically, pattern separation processes have been shown to rely heavily on processing in the hippocampus. Therefore, we predicted modulation of hippocampal activity by pattern separation demands, but no such modulation of striatal activity. Using a variant of the conditional visuomotor associative learning task that we have used previously, we presented participants with two blocked conditions: items with high and low perceptual overlap during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). As predicted, we observed learning-related activity in the hippocampus, which was greater in the high than the low overlap condition, particularly in the dentate gyrus. In contrast, the associative striatum also showed learning related activity, but it was not modulated by overlap condition. Using functional connectivity analyses, we showed that the correlation between the hippocampus and dentate gyrus with the associative striatum was differentially modulated by high vs. low overlap, suggesting that the coordination between these regions was affected when pattern separation demands were high. These findings contribute to a growing literature that suggests that the hippocampus and striatal network both contribute to the learning of arbitrary associations that are computationally distinct and can be altered by task demands.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hippocampus; Paired associates; Reward learning; Striatum

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30300757      PMCID: PMC6263739          DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  88 in total

1.  Differential activation of monkey striatal neurons in the early and late stages of procedural learning.

Authors:  Shigehiro Miyachi; Okihide Hikosaka; Xiaofeng Lu
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary-learning-systems approach.

Authors:  Kenneth A Norman; Randall C O'Reilly
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 8.934

3.  Comparison of population activity in the dorsal premotor cortex and putamen during the learning of arbitrary visuomotor mappings.

Authors:  Ethan R Buch; Peter J Brasted; Steven P Wise
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Different neural correlates of reward expectation and reward expectation error in the putamen and caudate nucleus during stimulus-action-reward association learning.

Authors:  Masahiko Haruno; Mitsuo Kawato
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Cerebral changes during performance of overlearned arbitrary visuomotor associations.

Authors:  Meike J Grol; Floris P de Lange; Frans A J Verstraten; Richard E Passingham; Ivan Toni
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction.

Authors:  A M Dale; B Fischl; M I Sereno
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Caudate nucleus reactivity predicts perceptual learning rate for visual feature conjunctions.

Authors:  Eric A Reavis; Sebastian M Frank; Peter U Tse
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-01-31       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  The hippocampal-VTA loop: controlling the entry of information into long-term memory.

Authors:  John E Lisman; Anthony A Grace
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2005-06-02       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Dissociating hippocampal and striatal contributions to sequential prediction learning.

Authors:  Aaron M Bornstein; Nathaniel D Daw
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Amnesia for Complex Naturalistic Scenes and for Objects Following Fornix Transection in the Rhesus Monkey.

Authors:  D. Gaffan
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.386

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Mnemonic Similarity Task: A Tool for Assessing Hippocampal Integrity.

Authors:  Shauna M Stark; C Brock Kirwan; Craig E L Stark
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2019-10-06       Impact factor: 20.229

2.  A role for the medial temporal lobes in category learning.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Wang; F Gregory Ashby
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.460

3.  Mnemonic Similarity Task to study episodic memory in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Tanusree Das; Nessa Kim; Colin McDaniel; Kathleen L Poston
Journal:  Clin Park Relat Disord       Date:  2020-06-03
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.