Literature DB >> 30300317

A New Echocardiographic Tool for Cardiac Output Evaluation: An Experimental Study.

Xavier Bobbia1, Laurent Muller2, Pierre-Géraud Claret1, Laure Vigouroux1, Antonia Perez-Martin3, Jean Emmanuel de La Coussaye1, Jean Yves Lefrant2, Guillaume Louart2, Claire Roger2, Thibaut Markarian4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The correlation between cardiac output (CO) evaluated by echocardiography and CO measured by thermodilution (COth) varies according to different studies. A new transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) tool allows automatic calculation of the subaortic velocity time index (VTIauto) and CO (COauto). The main objective was to evaluate the correlation between COth and COauto in an anesthetized, ventilated piglet hemorrhagic shock (HS) model. The secondary objectives were to evaluate the correlation between COth and CO evaluated by manual measurements of VTI, and the preload-dependency of VTIvaresp.
METHODS: Eighteen piglets were bled until mean arterial pressure reached 40 mm Hg. Controlled hemorrhage was maintained for 30 min before a resuscitation phase. CO was measured by Pulse index Contour Cardiac Output thermodilution methods. At each time of the experiment, three VTI values were measured (min, med, max) and the average value was calculated. COs were calculated by TTE (COmax, COmed, COmin, COave).
RESULTS: For the 204 measures attempted, the success rate was 197 (97%) manually and 122 (60%) automatically (P < 0.01). The correlation coefficients (r) between COth and, respectively, COauto, COave, COmax, COmed, and COmin were: 0.83 (95% CI [0.76; 0.88]; P < 0.01), 0.54 (95% CI [0.43; 0.63]; P < 0.01), 0.43 (95% CI [0.31; 0.54]; P < 0.01), 0.58 (95% CI [0.48; 0.67]; P < 0.01), and 0.52 (95% CI [0.41; 0.62]; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: In an experimental model of HS, a new ultrasound tool, COauto, seems better correlated with COth than manual echocardiographic measurements.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30300317     DOI: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000001273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Shock        ISSN: 1073-2322            Impact factor:   3.454


  5 in total

1.  Speckle tracking quantification of lung sliding for the diagnosis of pneumothorax: a multicentric observational study.

Authors:  Gary Duclos; Xavier Bobbia; Thibaut Markarian; Laurent Muller; Camille Cheyssac; Sarah Castillon; Noémie Resseguier; Alain Boussuges; Giovanni Volpicelli; Marc Leone; Laurent Zieleskiewicz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  The Evolution of Ultrasound in Critical Care: From Procedural Guidance to Hemodynamic Monitor.

Authors:  Igor Barjaktarevic; Jon-Émile S Kenny; David Berlin; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 2.153

Review 3.  Rationale for using the velocity-time integral and the minute distance for assessing the stroke volume and cardiac output in point-of-care settings.

Authors:  Pablo Blanco
Journal:  Ultrasound J       Date:  2020-04-21

4.  Artificial intelligence (AI) versus expert: A comparison of left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral (LVOT-VTI) assessment between ICU doctors and an AI tool.

Authors:  Shanshan Zhai; Hui Wang; Lichao Sun; Bo Zhang; Feng Huo; Shuang Qiu; Xiaoqing Wu; Junyu Ma; Yina Wu; Jun Duan
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 2.243

5.  Automated versus manual B-lines counting, left ventricular outflow tract velocity time integral and inferior vena cava collapsibility index in COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Srinath Damodaran; Anuja Vijay Kulkarni; Vikneswaran Gunaseelan; Vimal Raj; Muralidhar Kanchi
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2022-05-19
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.