Literature DB >> 30299509

Influence of dietary zinc concentration and supplemental zinc source on nutrient digestibility, zinc absorption, and retention in sheep.

Katherine R VanValin1, Olivia N Genther-Schroeder1, Remy N Carmichael1, Christopher P Blank1, Erin L Deters1, Sarah J Hartman1, Emma K Niedermayer1, Scott B Laudert2, Stephanie L Hansen1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess whether supplemental Zn source or concentration would affect ruminant Zn retention and nutrient digestibility. Thirty-six weaned crossbred Polypay wethers, were sorted by BW to 3 periods and stagger started on a common diet (22 mg Zn/kg DM) for a 52-d depletion period. Day 52 BW was used to assign Zn treatments (3 lambs/treatment/period): no supplemental Zn (CON), or supplemental Zn (40 mg Zn/d) from Zn sulfate (ING; Zinc Nacional, Monterrey, SA, Mexico), Zn methionine (ORG; Zinpro 120; Zinpro, Eden Prairie, MN), or Zn hydroxychloride (HYD; IntelliBond Z; Micronutrients USA LLC, Indianapolis, IN). On day 53 (day 1 of Zn treatments), lambs were moved to metabolism crates for 10 d of adaptation and 5 d of total fecal and urine collection. Blood for plasma Zn analysis was collected on day 52 and day 68. Data were analyzed as a randomized complete design with fixed effects of treatment, period and the interaction, which was significant (P ≥ 0.19) for day 68 plasma Zn but was removed for all other variables. Contrast statements were used to separate treatment means: CON vs. ZINC (ING, ORG, HYD), ING vs. HYD, and ORG vs. HYD. Day 52 plasma Zn concentrations were similar when CON was compared with ZINC (P = 0.84), and when ING and ORG were compared with HYD (P ≥ 0.19). Dry matter and neutral detergent fiber digestibility were lesser in ORG compared with HYD (P = 0.05) and organic matter and acid detergent fiber digestibility tended (P ≤ 0.08) to be lesser in ORG compared with HYD. Intake and fecal excretion of Zn was lesser, while apparent absorption of Zn was greater, in CON compared with ZINC (P ≤ 0.001). Zinc retained as a percent of Zn intake was greater in CON compared with ZINC (P = 0.001). Zinc retained (mg/d) was similar in CON compared with ZINC (P = 0.58) and when ING or ORG were compared with HYD (P ≥ 0.83). There was a treatment × period interaction for day 68 plasma Zn where treatments did not differ for periods 1 and 3 but ORG lambs had increased plasma Zn in period 2 compared with other treatments (P = 0.02). Lambs receiving no supplemental Zn had increased apparent absorption, suggesting Zn absorption may be upregulated in these lambs. Similarities in Zn retention across treatments suggests Zn requirements of these lambs were met regardless of supplementation concentration or source. Nutrient digestibility was improved in HYD lambs compared with ORG, and further work is needed to clarify the influence of supplemental Zn source on nutrient digestion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30299509      PMCID: PMC6276585          DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky384

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  23 in total

1.  Effects of supplemental zinc and manganese on ruminal fermentation, forage intake, and digestion by cattle fed prairie hay and urea.

Authors:  H M Arelovich; F N Owens; G W Horn; J A Vizcarra
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effect of zinc source (zinc oxide vs zinc proteinate) and level on performance, carcass characteristics, and immune response of growing and finishing steers.

Authors:  J W Spears; E B Kegley
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Nutritional recommendations of feedlot consulting nutritionists: The 2015 New Mexico State and Texas Tech University survey.

Authors:  K L Samuelson; M E Hubbert; M L Galyean; C A Löest
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 4.  The essential trace elements.

Authors:  W Mertz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Total true efficiency of zinc utilization: determination and homeostatic dependence upon the zinc supply status in young rats.

Authors:  E Weigand; M Kirchgessner
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1980-03       Impact factor: 4.798

6.  Comparison of growth performance and zinc absorption, retention, and excretion in weanling pigs fed diets supplemented with zinc-polysaccharide or zinc oxide.

Authors:  C E Buff; D W Bollinger; M R Ellersieck; W A Brommelsiek; T L Veum
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Responsive transporter genes within the murine intestinal-pancreatic axis form a basis of zinc homeostasis.

Authors:  Juan P Liuzzi; Jeffrey A Bobo; Louis A Lichten; Don A Samuelson; Robert J Cousins
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-20       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Zinc methionine for ruminants: relative bioavailability of zinc in lambs and effects of growth and performance of growing heifers.

Authors:  J W Spears
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Phytate phosphorus intake and disappearance in the gastrointestinal tract of high producing dairy cows.

Authors:  W D Clark; J E Wohlt; R L Gilbreath; P K Zajac
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 4.034

10.  High dietary sulfur decreases the retention of copper, manganese, and zinc in steers.

Authors:  D J Pogge; M E Drewnoski; S L Hansen
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  4 in total

1.  Impact of Zinc and/or Herbal Mixture on Ruminal Fermentation, Microbiota, and Histopathology in Lambs.

Authors:  Daniel Petrič; Dominika Mravčáková; Katarína Kucková; Svetlana Kišidayová; Adam Cieslak; Malgorzata Szumacher-Strabel; Haihao Huang; Pawel Kolodziejski; Anna Lukomska; Sylwester Slusarczyk; Klaudia Čobanová; Zora Váradyová
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-01-28

2.  Does Herbal and/or Zinc Dietary Supplementation Improve the Antioxidant and Mineral Status of Lambs with Parasite Infection?

Authors:  Klaudia Čobanová; Zora Váradyová; Ľubomíra Grešáková; Katarína Kucková; Dominika Mravčáková; Marián Várady
Journal:  Antioxidants (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-24

3.  Effect of zinc sources and experimental conditions on zinc balance in growing wethers.

Authors:  Chanhee Lee; Jacob E Copelin; Mike T Socha
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-01-12

4.  Effects of zinc and Bacillus subtilis on the reproductive performance, egg quality, nutrient digestion, intestinal morphology, and serum antioxidant capacity of geese breeders.

Authors:  Wenlei Fan; Jing Shi; Baowei Wang; Mingai Zhang; Min Kong; Wenli Li
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 3.352

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.