Literature DB >> 30299319

Clinical significance of cerebroplacental ratio.

Erkan Kalafat1,2, Asma Khalil1,3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Two-thirds of the pregnancies complicated by stillbirth demonstrate growth restriction. Identification of the foetus at risk of growth restriction is essential to reduce the risk of stillbirth. The aim of this review is to critically appraise the current evidence regarding clinical utility of cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) in antenatal surveillance. RECENT
FINDINGS: The CPR has emerged as an assessment tool for foetuses at increased risk of growth disorders. CPR is a better predictor of adverse events compared with middle-cerebral artery or umbilical artery Doppler alone. The predictive value of CPR for adverse perinatal outcomes is better for suspected small-for-gestational age foetuses compared with appropriate-for-gestational age (AGA) foetuses. CPR could be useful for the risk stratification of small-for-gestational age foetuses to determine the timing of delivery and also to calculate the risk of intrapartum compromise or prolonged admission to the neonatal care unit. Although there are many proposed cut-offs for an abnormal CPR value, evidence is currently lacking to suggest the use of one cut-off over another. CPR appears to be associated with increased risk of intrapartum foetal compromise, abnormal growth velocity, and lower birthweight in AGA foetuses as well. Moreover, birthweight differences are better explained with CPR compared to other factors such as ethnicity. However, the role of CPR in predicting adverse perinatal outcomes such as acidosis or low Apgar scores in AGA foetuses is yet to be determined.
SUMMARY: CPR appears to be a useful surrogate of suboptimal foetal growth and intrauterine hypoxia and it is associated with a variety of perinatal adverse events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30299319     DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1040-872X            Impact factor:   1.927


  4 in total

1.  Prediction of neonatal acidosis using the cerebroplacental ratio at different gestational weeks: A case-control study.

Authors:  Lin-Na Guo; Yi-Qing Chai; Shuang Guo; Zhi-Kun Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 2.  Cerebral Blood Flow Monitoring in High-Risk Fetal and Neonatal Populations.

Authors:  Rachel L Leon; Eric B Ortigoza; Noorjahan Ali; Dimitrios Angelis; Joshua S Wolovits; Lina F Chalak
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 3.  Fetal growth restriction and stillbirth: Biomarkers for identifying at risk fetuses.

Authors:  Victoria J King; Laura Bennet; Peter R Stone; Alys Clark; Alistair J Gunn; Simerdeep K Dhillon
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Cerebroplacental Ratio Versus Nonstress Test in Predicting Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Prospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Priyadarshini Nayak; Sweta Singh; Pruthwiraj Sethi; Tapas Kumar Som
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-06-30
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.