Literature DB >> 30299233

A Predictive Model for Postembolization Syndrome after Transarterial Hepatic Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Mohamed H Khalaf1, Vandana Sundaram1, Mohammed Ahmed AbdelRazek Mohammed1, Rajesh Shah1, Ankaj Khosla1, Katherine Jackson1, Manisha Desai1, Nishita Kothary1.   

Abstract

Purpose To develop and validate a predictive model for postembolization syndrome (PES) following transarterial hepatic chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma. Materials and Methods In this single-center, retrospective study, 370 patients underwent 513 TACE procedures between October 2014 and September 2016. Seventy percent of the patients were randomly assigned to a training data set and the remaining 30% were assigned to a testing data set. Variables included demographic, laboratory, clinical, and procedural details. PES was defined as pain and/or nausea beyond 6 hours after TACE that required intravenous medication for symptom control. The predictive model was developed by using conditional inference trees and Lasso regression. Results Demographics, laboratory data, performance, tumor characteristics, and procedural details were statistically similar for the training and testing data sets. Overall, 83 of 370 patients (22.4%) after 107 of 513 TACE procedures (20.8%) met the predefined criteria. Factors identified at univariable analysis included large tumor burden (P = .004), drug-eluting embolic TACE (P = .03), doxorubicin dose (P = .003), history of PES (P < .001) and chronic pain (P < .001), of which history of PES, tumor burden, and drug-eluting embolic TACE were identified as the strongest predictors by the multivariable analysis and were used to develop the predictive model. When applied to the testing data set, the model demonstrated an area under the curve of 0.62, sensitivity of 79% (22 of 28), specificity of 44.2% (53 of 120), and a negative predictive value of 90% (53 of 59). Conclusion The model identified history of postembolization syndrome, tumor burden, and drug-eluting embolic chemoembolization as predictors of protracted recovery because of postembolization syndrome. © RSNA, 2018.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30299233     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018180257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  10 in total

1.  Determination of Risk Factors for Pain After Transarterial Chemoembolization with Drug-Eluting Beads for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Tian-Cheng Wang; Zi-Shu Zhang; Yu-Dong Xiao
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 3.133

2.  A Nomogram Model of Radiomics and Satellite Sign Number as Imaging Predictor for Intracranial Hematoma Expansion.

Authors:  Wen Xu; Zhongxiang Ding; Yanna Shan; Wenhui Chen; Zhan Feng; Peipei Pang; Qijun Shen
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 4.677

Review 3.  Current updates in machine learning in the prediction of therapeutic outcome of hepatocellular carcinoma: what should we know?

Authors:  Zhi-Min Zou; De-Hua Chang; Hui Liu; Yu-Dong Xiao
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2021-03-06

4.  Identifying predictors and evaluating the role of steroids in the prevention of post-embolization syndrome after transarterial chemoembolization and bland embolization.

Authors:  Rohit Agrawal; Muhammad Majeed; Sheeba-Ba Aqeel; Yuchen Wang; Zohaib Haque; Yazan Abu Omar; Shristi Banskota Upadhyay; Thomas Gast; Bashar M Attar; Seema Gandhi
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-12-12

5.  Intraarterial Lidocaine Administration for Pain Control by Water-in-Oil Technique in Transarterial Chemoembolization: in vivo and Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Li-Zhou Wang; Xiao-Xia Hu; Xiang-Chun Shen; Tian-Cheng Wang; Shi Zhou
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2021-10-05

6.  Methodological conduct of prognostic prediction models developed using machine learning in oncology: a systematic review.

Authors:  Paula Dhiman; Jie Ma; Constanza L Andaur Navarro; Benjamin Speich; Garrett Bullock; Johanna A A Damen; Lotty Hooft; Shona Kirtley; Richard D Riley; Ben Van Calster; Karel G M Moons; Gary S Collins
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.615

7.  Safety and Efficacy of Drug-Eluting Beads Trans-Arterial Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Taiwan (SERENADE-T).

Authors:  Yi-Sheng Liu; Pi-Yi Chang; Po-Chin Liang; Ming-Ching Ou; Jen-I Hwang; Chien-Hung Chen
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2022-08-15

8.  Efficacy and safety analysis of dexamethasone-lipiodol emulsion in prevention of post-embolization syndrome after TACE: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Haohao Lu; Chuansheng Zheng; Bin Liang; Bin Xiong
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.067

9.  Predictive model for acute abdominal pain after transarterial chemoembolization for liver cancer.

Authors:  Li-Fang Bian; Xue-Hong Zhao; Bei-Lei Gao; Sheng Zhang; Guo-Mei Ge; Dong-Di Zhan; Ting-Ting Ye; Yan Zheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Systemic Inflammation Response Index is a Prognostic Risk Factor in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing TACE.

Authors:  Jun-Xiang Li; Peng-Fei Pang; Tian-Cheng Wang; Tian-Zhi An
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-06-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.