Literature DB >> 30298915

Accuracy of anogenital distance and anti-Müllerian hormone in the diagnosis of endometriosis without surgery.

María L Sánchez-Ferrer1,2, Raquel Jiménez-Velázquez1, Jaime Mendiola2,3,4, María T Prieto-Sánchez1,2, Laura Cánovas-López1, Ana Carmona-Barnosi1, Shiana Corbalán-Biyang1, Ana I Hernández-Peñalver1, Evdochia Adoamnei3, Aníbal Nieto1,2, Alberto M Torres-Cantero2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the predictive ability of a combination of anogenital distance (AGD) and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) to diagnosis the presence of endometriosis without surgery.
METHODS: The present study included women diagnosed with endometriosis and a control group who attended the "Virgen de la Arrixaca" University Hospital, Murcia, Spain, between September 1, 2014, and May 31, 2015. Serum concentrations of AMH were measured, and two AGD measurements were obtained: from the anterior clitoral surface to the upper verge of the anus (AGDAC ), and from the posterior fourchette to the upper verge of the anus (AGDAF ). Data were assessed by receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves.
RESULTS: Women in the endometriosis group (n=57) had significantly shorter AGDAF (22.8 ± 4.6 vs 27.2 ± 5.7 mm; P<0.001) and lower AMH (2.2 ± 2.5 vs 3.3 ± 1.9 ng/mL; P<0.003) compared with the control group (n=93). Women with serum AMH below the clinical cut-off (1 ng/mL) were 17.40-times more likely to have endometriosis (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.64-53.82). The area under the ROC curve of combined AMH and AGDAF was 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.85).
CONCLUSION: The model for predicting endometriosis on the basis of AMH and AGD could be useful for clinicians and epidemiologists to improve diagnosis and prognosis of this condition.
© 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anogenital distance; Anti-Müllerian hormone; Endometriosis; Predictive model; Prenatal exposures; ROC curve

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30298915     DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  7 in total

1.  Anogenital distance in adult women is a strong marker of endometriosis: results of a prospective study with laparoscopic and histological findings.

Authors:  A Crestani; A Arfi; S Ploteau; M Breban; A-S Boudy; S Bendifallah; C Ferrier; E Darai
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-06-06

Review 2.  Variation among human populations in endometriosis and PCOS A test of the inverse comorbidity model.

Authors:  Bernard Crespi
Journal:  Evol Med Public Health       Date:  2021-09-17

Review 3.  Endometriosis and polycystic ovary syndrome are diametric disorders.

Authors:  Natalie L Dinsdale; Bernard J Crespi
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  Midgestation origins of androgenic and estrogenic pathophysiology in three major women's health disorders.

Authors:  David H Abbott; Daniel A Dumesic
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 7.490

5.  A short anogenital distance on MRI is a marker of endometriosis.

Authors:  A Crestani; C Abdel Wahab; A Arfi; S Ploteau; K Kolanska; M Breban; S Bendifallah; C Ferrier; E Darai
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-02-17

Review 6.  Unveiling the Pathogenesis of Adenomyosis through Animal Models.

Authors:  Xi Wang; Giuseppe Benagiano; Xishi Liu; Sun-Wei Guo
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  A Systematic Review of Anogenital Distance and Gynecological Disorders: Endometriosis and Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Zhenyan Pan; Fangfang Zhu; Kai Zhou
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 5.555

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.