Yutaka Yonezawa1,2, Taishi Miyashita1, Hiroaki Nejishima1, Yohei Takeda3, Kunitoshi Imai3, Haruko Ogawa2,3. 1. Pharmacokinetics and Safety Department, Drug Research Center, Kaken Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 301, Gensuke, Fujieda, Shizuoka 426-8646, Japan. 2. United Graduate School of Veterinary Sciences, Gifu University, Yanagido, Gifu, Gifu 501-1193, Japan. 3. Department of Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, 2-11 Inada, Obihiro, Hokkaido 080-8555, Japan.
Abstract
The control of inflammation, which arises from complex biological responses to harmful stimuli, is an important determinant of both clinical outcomes and patient comfort. However, the side effects of many current therapies such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs mean that new safe treatments are required. We previously reported that 12.5 µg/ml hydroxytyrosol (HT) suppressed gene expression of the inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthase (iNOS) isoform and NO production, in mouse peritoneal macrophages treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), where nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) gene expression was not altered. The present study evaluated the anti-inflammatory effects of various concentrations of HT in LPS-induced RAW264.7 mouse macrophages. HT suppressed NF-κB signaling and downregulated LPS-mediated expression of iNOS, cyclooxygenase-2, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and interleukin-1β at 12.5 µg/ml, resulting in reduced production of NO and prostaglandin E2. At lower concentrations, HT seemed to act via another signaling pathway to regulate the inflammatory response. In contrast, HT did not suppress LPS-induced expression of phosphorylated p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinase. This study showed that HT had anti-inflammatory effects on LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. HT is already available as a nutritional supplement and no toxic effects have been reported. Hence, HT represents a potential novel anti-inflammatory agent.
The control of inflammation, which arises from complex biological responses to harmful stimuli, is an important determinant of both clinical outcomes and patient comfort. However, the side effects of many current therapies such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs mean that new safe treatments are required. We previously reported that 12.5 µg/ml hydroxytyrosol (HT) suppressed gene expression of the inducible nitric oxide (NO) synthase (iNOS) isoform and NO production, in mouse peritoneal macrophages treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS), where nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) gene expression was not altered. The present study evaluated the anti-inflammatory effects of various concentrations of HT in LPS-induced RAW264.7mouse macrophages. HT suppressed NF-κB signaling and downregulated LPS-mediated expression of iNOS, cyclooxygenase-2, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and interleukin-1β at 12.5 µg/ml, resulting in reduced production of NO and prostaglandin E2. At lower concentrations, HT seemed to act via another signaling pathway to regulate the inflammatory response. In contrast, HT did not suppress LPS-induced expression of phosphorylated p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinase. This study showed that HT had anti-inflammatory effects on LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells. HT is already available as a nutritional supplement and no toxic effects have been reported. Hence, HT represents a potential novel anti-inflammatory agent.
Inflammation can result from complex biological responses of body tissues to harmful stimuli
such as pathogens, damaged cells, or irritants; these protective responses involve immune
cells, blood vessels, and molecular mediators. Inflammation eliminates the initial cause of
cell injury, clears out necrotic cells and tissues damaged by the original insult and the
inflammatory process, and initiates tissue repair. However, excessive inflammation causes
chronic inflammatory conditions including arthritis, asthma, multiple sclerosis, and
atherosclerosis [13]. The activation of
pro-inflammatory cells, mainly macrophages, plays a critical role in inflammatory response.
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which is a component of the cell wall of gram-negative bacteria, is
known to activate cytokine networks by inducing the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such
as tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and inflammatory
mediators including nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) [1, 27]. NO can be
synthesized from l-arginine by a family of NO synthases (NOS). An inducible isoform of NOS
(iNOS) is only expressed after exposure to pro-inflammatory conditions. Once expressed, iNOS
generates large amounts of NO, which plays an important role in acute and chronic inflammation
[10, 26].
Although the suppression of excessive inflammation is important to control chronic
inflammatory diseases, current therapies using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs sometimes
cause harmful side effects [17, 20]. Hence, novel anti-inflammatory agents with reduced side effects are
required.Hydroxytyrosol (HT), which is a small phenolic molecule found in olive oil, exerts strong
antioxidant activity and acts as an anti-inflammatory, antithrombotic, antitumor, and
antimicrobial agent [22]. In a previous study, we
reported that HT suppressed iNOS gene expression and NO production in mouse peritoneal
macrophages treated with LPS. However, no suppression of the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB)
signaling pathway was observed. These results indicate that HT suppresses LPS-induced NO
production in an NF-κB pathway-independent manner in mouse peritoneal macrophages [21]. On the other hand, Zhang et al.
[28] reported that HT suppressed the translocation of
NF-κB to the nucleus in the presence of LPS in human monocytic THP-1 cells. Although these two
studies employed similar HT concentrations of 80 µM (12.5
µg/ml) and 100 µM, different cells were
studied. These results suggest that low HT concentrations may not always be able to suppress
the NF-κB-mediated inflammatory response. Alternatively, different macrophage lineage cells
cultured with HT could show different responses to LPS stimulation. In addition to its effects
on NF-κB signaling, LPS has been reported to induce other signaling pathways. In particular,
p44/42 mitogen-activated protein kinase (ERK1/2) was strongly induced by LPS in monocytes and
macrophages [8, 23], and HT may exert an anti-inflammatory effect by suppressing this signaling
pathway.In this study, we aimed to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effects of various concentrations
of HT, and to clarify its mechanism of action in an LPS-induced RAW264.7mouse macrophage cell
line.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
HT
HT (>98% purity; Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) was dissolved in
distilled water (Otsuka Pharmaceutical Factory, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) to 100
µg/ml and was stored at −80°C.
In vitro culture of RAW264.7 cells and cytotoxicity testing
A mouseRAW264.7 macrophage cell line (DS Pharma Biomedical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) was
cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd., Osaka,
Japan) containing 10% fetal bovine serum at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2
incubator.The cells were added to 24-well plates (1 × 106 cells per well). Two hours
later, the medium was replaced with fresh medium to remove non-adherent cells. Fresh
medium containing serially diluted HT (0−50 µg/ml) was
added to the wells, and the cells were cultured at 37°C for 24 hr. The cytotoxicity of HT
was determined by measuring the amount of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) released from the
cells using an automatic biochemical analysis system (LABOSPECT 006; Hitachi
High-Technologies Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
Effect of HT on RAW264.7 cells stimulated with LPS
RAW264.7 cells were added to 12-well plates (2 × 106 per well), and
non-adherent cells were removed 2 hr later. Adherent cells were cultured in medium
containing HT (1.56−12.5 µg/ml) with LPS (0.25
µg/ml) at 37°C for 3 or 24 hr. The cells cultured in
the absence of LPS and HT served as controls. The cultured cells were harvested, and
real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RRT-PCR) was used to measure
the levels of mRNA-encoding proteins involved in inflammation. The NO, PGE2,
TNF-α, and IL-1β concentrations in cell culture media harvested following 24 hr of
incubation were determined using a Nitric Oxide (total) detection kit (Enzo Life Sciences,
New York, NY, U.S.A.), Prostaglandin E2 ELISA kit (Abcam, Cambridge, U.K.), Mouse TNF
alpha SimpleStep ELISA® kit (Abcam), and IL-1 betaMouse SimpleStep
ELISA® Kit (Abcam), respectively. The cellular COX-2 concentrations were
determined using a MouseCOX2 SimpleStep ELISA® kit (Abcam). For western
blotting, the cells were harvested after 15 min to analyze the expression of
phosphorylated NF-κB (pNF-κB) and ERK1/2 (pERK1/2), and after 6 hr to analyze the
expression of iNOS.
RRT-PCR analysis of gene expression
For RRT-PCR analysis of gene expression, the cells were harvested after 3 and 24 hr.
Total RNA was extracted from cells using the RNeasy® Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Venlo,
Netherlands) and reverse-transcribed using the QuantiTectTM Reverse
Transcription Kit (QIAGEN) as follows: 42°C for 15 min and 95°C for 3 min. RRT-PCR was
performed using the cDNAs and QuantiFast SYBR® Green PCR (QIAGEN) with AriaMx
(Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, U.S.A.). The primers (QuantiTectTM
Primer Assays, QIAGEN) are listed in Table
1. The PCR reactions were conducted as follows: 95°C for 5 min, with 40 cycles
of 95°C for 10 sec and 60°C for 30 sec. The threshold cycle (Ct) was defined as
the number of cycles required for the intensity of fluorescence to rise above the
threshold value. The Ct values were normalized to those of glyceraldehyde
3-phosphate dehydrogenase, and expressed in relation to the signals observed in control
(LPS-treated) cells. In samples with levels that were undetectable using RRT-PCR, the
Ct value was defined as 45. The results were expressed as the relative
differences in gene expression, in accordance with the MIQE guidelines [3].
Table 1.
Prime sets (QuantiTect Primer Assay, QIAGEN) used in real-time RT-PCR
Gene name
Assay name
iNOS (Nitric oxide synthase 2, inducible)
Mm_LOC673161_1_SG
COX-2 (Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2)
Mm_Ptgs2_1_SG
TNF-α (Tumor necrosis factor alpha)
Mm_Tnf_1_SG
NF-κB (Nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide
gene enhancer in B-cells)
Mm_Nfkb1_1_SG
IL-1β (Interleukin 1 beta)
Mm_Il1b_2_SG
IL-6 (Interleukin 6)
Mm_Il6_1_SG
IL-10 (Interleukin 10)
Mm_Il10_1_SG
Gapdh (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase)
Mm_Gapdh_3_SG
Western blotting analysis
Lysates of cells harvested after 15 min or 6 hr were electrophoresed using Mini-PROTEAN
TGX Precast Gels (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, U.S.A.), and the proteins were transferred to a
polyvinylidene difluoride membrane using a Trans-Blot Turbo Transfer Pack (Bio-Rad). The
membranes were blocked with phosphate-buffered saline containing 0.3% skim milk and then
incubated with the relevant primary antibodies: anti-NF-κB, anti-pNF-κB, anti-ERK1/2,
anti-pERK1/2, or anti-iNOS (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, U.S.A.).
Antigen-antibody complexes bound to the membrane were detected using the
SuperSignalTM West Pico (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, U.S.A.), and
analyzed with a LAS-3000 (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). As an internal control, β-actin was
detected using the anti-β-Actin HRP-DirecT kit (Medical & Biological Laboratories,
Nagoya, Japan).
Statistical analysis
Results are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SE). Statistical analysis
was performed using the Williams’ multiple comparison test. Statistical values of
P<0.05 were considered significantly different.
RESULTS
Low concentrations of HT are not cytotoxic to RAW264.7 cells
First, we evaluated the cytotoxicity of 0–50 µg/ml
(0–320 µM) HT in RAW264.7 cells. No increase in the LDH concentration, as
an indicator of cytotoxicity, was observed at any of these concentrations. However, the
LDH concentration was slightly decreased in cells exposed to ≥25
µg/ml (160 µM); the reason for this
was not known (Fig. 1). Thus, subsequent experiments were carried out at HT concentrations of 0–12.5
µg/ml.
Fig. 1.
A low concentration of HT was not cytotoxic to RAW264.7 cells. RAW264.7 cells were
cultured with HT (0–50 µg/ml) for 24 hr. LDH
concentration in cell culture media was evaluated. Error bars indicate means ± SE
(n=3).
A low concentration of HT was not cytotoxic to RAW264.7 cells. RAW264.7 cells were
cultured with HT (0–50 µg/ml) for 24 hr. LDH
concentration in cell culture media was evaluated. Error bars indicate means ± SE
(n=3).
HT suppresses the expression of LPS-induced inflammatory genes
We next evaluated the effects of HT in RAW264.7 cells stimulated with LPS (0.25
µg/ml). LPS-stimulated RAW264.7 cells were cultured in
the presence of HT (0–12.5 µg/ml) for 3 and 24 hr.At 3 hr, cells exposed to LPS alone showed significantly greater gene expression of iNOS,
COX-2, TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6, as compared with control cells. Although NF-κB and IL-10
gene expression was also increased, the increase was not statistically significant. The
addition of HT significantly suppressed these LPS-induced changes in gene expression.
Cells exposed to HT (1.56–12.5 µg/ml) showed
significantly lower TNF-α and IL-1β mRNA levels (Fig.
2).
Fig. 2.
HT suppresses the early phase-expression of LPS-induced inflammatory genes in
RAW264.7 cells. RAW264.7 cells were stimulated by LPS (0.25
µg/ml) and cultured with HT (0–12.5
µg/ml) for 3 hr. Expression of the iNOS, COX-2,
TNF-α, NF-κB, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10 genes in RAW264.7 cells were analyzed by
RRT-PCR. Error bars indicate means ± SE (n=4). ***P<0.001.
HT suppresses the early phase-expression of LPS-induced inflammatory genes in
RAW264.7 cells. RAW264.7 cells were stimulated by LPS (0.25
µg/ml) and cultured with HT (0–12.5
µg/ml) for 3 hr. Expression of the iNOS, COX-2,
TNF-α, NF-κB, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10 genes in RAW264.7 cells were analyzed by
RRT-PCR. Error bars indicate means ± SE (n=4). ***P<0.001.At 24 hr, cells treated with LPS alone showed significant increases in the gene
expression of iNOS, COX-2, IL-1β, and IL-6, as compared with control cells. In contrast,
NF-κB, TNF-α, and IL-10 gene expression was not altered by exposure to LPS. HT
significantly reduced the mRNA levels of iNOS, COX-2, and IL-1β at concentrations of 12.5,
1.56–12.5, and 1.56–12.5 µg/ml, respectively (Fig. 3). These results indicate that HT suppresses LPS-induced upregulation of
inflammatory gene expression.
Fig. 3.
HT suppresses the late phase-expression of LPS-induced inflammatory genes in
RAW264.7 cells. RAW264.7 cells were stimulated by LPS (0.25
µg/ml) and cultured with HT (0–12.5
µg/ml) for 24 hr. Expression of the iNOS, COX-2,
TNF-α, NF-κB, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10 genes in RAW264.7 cells were analyzed by
RRT-PCR. Error bars indicate means ± SE (n=4). *P<0.05,
**P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
HT suppresses the late phase-expression of LPS-induced inflammatory genes in
RAW264.7 cells. RAW264.7 cells were stimulated by LPS (0.25
µg/ml) and cultured with HT (0–12.5
µg/ml) for 24 hr. Expression of the iNOS, COX-2,
TNF-α, NF-κB, IL-1β, IL-6 and IL-10 genes in RAW264.7 cells were analyzed by
RRT-PCR. Error bars indicate means ± SE (n=4). *P<0.05,
**P<0.01, ***P<0.001.
HT suppresses the production of LPS-induced inflammatory mediators
We also assessed the effects of HT on the production of LPS-induced inflammatory
mediators. The concentrations of these molecules in culture media were assessed, and the
COX-2 protein level in RAW264.7 cells was evaluated by ELISA. LPS significantly increased
the levels of NO, PGE2, TNF-α, and IL-1β in conditioned media, and cellular
COX-2 levels. The LPS-mediated induction of NO, PGE2, and IL-1β was
significantly attenuated in cells exposed to 3.13–12.5, 1.56–12.5, and 1.56–12.5
µg/ml HT in a concentration-dependent manner,
respectively. The cellular COX-2 level was slightly lower in cells exposed to HT, but this
difference was not statistically significant. In contrast, the presence of HT did not
reduce LPS-mediated TNF-α production (Fig. 4). These results indicate that HT suppresses the production of multiple LPS-induced
inflammatory mediators.
Fig. 4.
HT suppresses the production of LPS-induced inflammatory mediators in RAW264.7
cells. RAW264.7 cells were stimulated by LPS (0.25
µg/ml) and cultured with HT (0–12.5
µg/ml) for 24 hr. NO concentrations in cell
culture media were evaluated using an NO detection kit. The concentrations of
PGE2, TNF-α, IL-1β in cell culture media and of COX-2 in cell extracts
were evaluated by ELISA. Error bars indicate means ± SE (n=3).
*P<0.05, **P<0.01,
***P<0.001.
HT suppresses the production of LPS-induced inflammatory mediators in RAW264.7
cells. RAW264.7 cells were stimulated by LPS (0.25
µg/ml) and cultured with HT (0–12.5
µg/ml) for 24 hr. NO concentrations in cell
culture media were evaluated using an NO detection kit. The concentrations of
PGE2, TNF-α, IL-1β in cell culture media and of COX-2 in cell extracts
were evaluated by ELISA. Error bars indicate means ± SE (n=3).
*P<0.05, **P<0.01,
***P<0.001.
HT suppresses the LPS-induced phosphorylation of NF-κB, and iNOS expression
We next analyzed the phosphorylation of NF-κB and ERK1/2 to identify which signaling
pathways were affected by HT. The iNOS expression level was also analyzed. Western
blotting was used to determine the levels of pNF-κB and pERK1/2 in RAW264.7 cells cultured
for 15 min, and of iNOS in cells cultured for 6 hr in the presence of LPS, with and
without HT. Exposure of this cell line to LPS (0.25
µg/ml) increased pNF-κB, pERK1/2, and iNOS expression.
The addition of 12.5 µg/ml HT suppressed this
LPS-mediated induction of pNF-κB and iNOS expression. In contrast, the expression level of
pERK1/2 was not affected by HT (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5.
HT suppresses the LPS-induced phosphorylation of NF-κB and iNOS in RAW264.7 cells.
(A-C) RAW264.7 cells were stimulated by LPS (0.25
µg/ml) and cultured with HT (0–12.5
µg/ml) for 15 min (A, B) or 6 hr (C). The levels
of NF-κB and pNF-κB (A), ERK1/2 and pERK1/2 (B), and iNOS (C) were analyzed by
western blotting. β-Actin was an internal control. Representative results of
duplicate experiments are shown.
HT suppresses the LPS-induced phosphorylation of NF-κB and iNOS in RAW264.7 cells.
(A-C) RAW264.7 cells were stimulated by LPS (0.25
µg/ml) and cultured with HT (0–12.5
µg/ml) for 15 min (A, B) or 6 hr (C). The levels
of NF-κB and pNF-κB (A), ERK1/2 and pERK1/2 (B), and iNOS (C) were analyzed by
western blotting. β-Actin was an internal control. Representative results of
duplicate experiments are shown.These results indicate that HT (at ≤12.5 µg/ml)
suppresses LPS-induced inflammatory cytokines in an ERK1/2 pathway-independent manner.
DISCUSSION
In the present study, we assessed the anti-inflammatory activities of HT in LPS-stimulated
RAW264.7mouse macrophages. HT suppressed LPS-induced NF-κB activation, TFN-α gene
expression, IL-1β production, and activation of the COX-2-PGE2 and iNOS-NO axes.
Toll-like receptor 4 is activated by LPS [14],
triggering NF-κB signaling and inflammatory cytokine production, which activates the innate
immune system [24]. IL-1β and TNF-α are rapidly
translated and released at sites of tissue injury or infection [6, 11, 15]. iNOS and COX-2 are induced by IL-1β, TNF-α [7, 18, 19], and other cytokines, and are thus released later in the process. In
the present study, HT suppressed the LPS-induced expression of TNF-α and IL-1β during the
early phase (Fig. 2). Suppression of these
inflammatory cytokines may therefore contribute to secondary inhibition of the iNOS-NO and
COX-2-PGE2 axes.Western blotting analysis showed that HT reduced the phosphorylation of NF-κB at 12.5
µg/ml (80 µM), but this activity was
not observed at concentrations below 6.25 µg/ml (40
µM) (Fig. 5). Zhang et
al. [28] showed that LPS-induced nuclear
translocation of NF-κB in THP-1 cells was suppressed by 100 µM HT, but not
by 50 µM. In the present study, even though the low HT concentration did
not suppress NF-κB signaling, it did suppress TNF-α and IL-1β gene expression and the
iNOS-NO axis. These results indicate that at a low concentration HT suppresses LPS-induced
inflammatory responses in an NF-κB pathway-independent manner. pERK1/2 was strongly induced
by LPS, as reported previously [8, 23]. However, HT did not suppress the expression of
pERK1/2 at any of the tested concentrations. Chan et al. [5] showed that LPS-induced iNOS production in RAW264.7
cells was modulated by the c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase or stress-activated protein
kinase pathway and the p38 MAPK pathway, in addition to the ERK pathway. Further studies are
required to clarify the signaling pathway responsible for the mechanism of action of HT.We previously showed that HT suppressed LPS-induced activation of the iNOS-NO axis in mouse
peritoneal macrophages. However, in contrast to the present study, we did not observe
suppression of NF-κB and COX-2 gene activation in mouse peritoneal macrophages [21]. Cardeno et al. [4] also reported that HT did not suppress COX-2 protein
expression in LPS-activated mouse peritoneal macrophages. However, Maiuri et
al. [16] and Zhang et al.
[28] reported that HT suppressed LPS-mediated
induction of both COX-2 gene expression and PGE2 production. These two studies
used J774murine macrophages and human monocytic THP-1 cells. These reports imply that HT
responsiveness differs between macrophage types. LPS stimulation caused different molecular
expression patterns in the RAW264.7 cell line, peritoneal macrophages, splenic macrophages,
and bone marrow-derived macrophages [2, 25]. As many different types of macrophages are present
in vivo, it is important to note that an experimental result acquired
from a single cell type will not completely reflect the comprehensive in
vivo phenomenon.The side effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are known to include mucosal
injuries to the stomach and small intestine [17], and
renal disorder [20]. HT did not show any toxic
effects in rodent studies [9], and is already widely
commercially available in foods and nutritional supplements [12]. Although additional studies are required to fully understand the
anti-inflammatory effects of HT, it would be worth testing whether HT effectively suppresses
harmful inflammatory responses in an animal model.
Authors: Alberto M Parra-Perez; Amalia Pérez-Jiménez; Isabel Gris-Cárdenas; Gloria C Bonel-Pérez; Luis M Carrasco-Díaz; Khalida Mokhtari; Leticia García-Salguero; José A Lupiáñez; Eva E Rufino-Palomares Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-06-24 Impact factor: 6.208
Authors: María Del Carmen Villegas-Aguilar; Álvaro Fernández-Ochoa; María de la Luz Cádiz-Gurrea; Sandra Pimentel-Moral; Jesús Lozano-Sánchez; David Arráez-Román; Antonio Segura-Carretero Journal: Molecules Date: 2020-01-29 Impact factor: 4.411
Authors: Andreia Nunes; Lídia Gonçalves; Joana Marto; Ana Margarida Martins; Alexandra N Silva; Pedro Pinto; Marta Martins; Carmo Fraga; Helena Margarida Ribeiro Journal: Pharmaceutics Date: 2021-03-30 Impact factor: 6.321
Authors: Marta Varela-Eirín; Paula Carpintero-Fernández; Agustín Sánchez-Temprano; Adrián Varela-Vázquez; Carlos Luis Paíno; Antonio Casado-Díaz; Alfonso Calañas-Continente; Virginia Mato; Eduardo Fonseca; Mustapha Kandouz; Alfonso Blanco; José Ramón Caeiro; María D Mayán Journal: Aging (Albany NY) Date: 2020-08-03 Impact factor: 5.955