Literature DB >> 30298602

Comparative ecophysiology of Dinophysis acuminata and D. acuta (DINOPHYCEAE, DINOPHYSIALES): effect of light intensity and quality on growth, cellular toxin content, and photosynthesis.

María García-Portela1, Pilar Riobó2, Beatriz Reguera1, José Luis Garrido2, Juan Blanco3, Francisco Rodríguez1.   

Abstract

Dinoflagellates of the genus Dinophysis are the most persistent producers of lipophilic shellfish toxins in Western Europe. Their mixotrophic nutrition requires a food chain of cryptophytes and plastid-bearing ciliates for sustained growth and photosynthesis. In this study, cultures of D. acuminata and D. acuta, their ciliate prey Mesodinium rubrum and the cryptophyte, Teleaulax amphioxeia, were subject to three experimental settings to study their physiological response to different combinations of light intensity and quality. Growth rates, pigment analyses (HPLC), photosynthetic parameters (PAM-fluorometry), and cellular toxin content (LC-MS) were determined. Specific differences in photosynthetic parameters were observed in Dinophysis exposed to different photon fluxes (10-650 μmol photons · m-2  · s-1 ), light quality (white, blue and green), and shifts in light regime. Dinophysis acuta was more susceptible to photodamage under high light intensities (370-650 μmol photons · m-2  · s-1 ) than D. acuminata but survived better with low light (10 μmol photons · m-2  · s-1 ) and to a prolonged period (28 d) of darkness. Mesodinium rubrum and T. amphioxeia showed their maximal growth rate and yield under white and high light whereas Dinophysis seemed better adapted to grow under green and blue light. Toxin analyses in Dinophysis showed maximal toxin per cell under high light after prey depletion at the late exponential-plateau phase. Changes observed in photosynthetic light curves of D. acuminata cultures after shifting light conditions from low intensity-blue light to high intensity-white light seemed compatible with photoacclimation in this species. Results obtained here are discussed in relation to different spatiotemporal distributions observed in field populations of D. acuminata and D. acuta in northwestern Iberia.
© 2018 Phycological Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990Dinophysiszzm321990; zzm321990PAMzzm321990; ecophysiology; light; pigments; toxins

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30298602     DOI: 10.1111/jpy.12794

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Phycol        ISSN: 0022-3646            Impact factor:   2.923


  4 in total

1.  Notes on the Cultivation of Two Mixotrophic Dinophysis Species and Their Ciliate Prey Mesodinium rubrum.

Authors:  Jorge Hernández-Urcera; Pilar Rial; María García-Portela; Patricia Lourés; Jane Kilcoyne; Francisco Rodríguez; Amelia Fernández-Villamarín; Beatriz Reguera
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.546

2.  Uptake of Inorganic and Organic Nitrogen Sources by Dinophysis acuminata and D. acuta.

Authors:  María García-Portela; Beatriz Reguera; Jesús Gago; Mickael Le Gac; Francisco Rodríguez
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-01-29

3.  Mesoscale Dynamics and Niche Segregation of Two Dinophysis Species in Galician-Portuguese Coastal Waters.

Authors:  Patricio A Díaz; Beatriz Reguera; Teresa Moita; Isabel Bravo; Manuel Ruiz-Villarreal; Santiago Fraga
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 4.546

4.  Lipophilic Toxins in Galicia (NW Spain) between 2014 and 2017: Incidence on the Main Molluscan Species and Analysis of the Monitoring Efficiency.

Authors:  Juan Blanco; Fabiola Arévalo; Jorge Correa; Ángeles Moroño
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.546

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.