Literature DB >> 30298439

The use of PBPK modeling across the pediatric age range using propofol as a case.

Robin Michelet1, Jan Van Bocxlaer2, Karel Allegaert3,4, An Vermeulen2.   

Abstract

The project SAFEPEDRUG aims to provide guidelines for drug research in children, based on bottom-up and top-down approaches. Propofol, one of the studied model compounds, was selected because it is extensively metabolized in liver and kidney, with an important role for the glucuronidation pathway. Besides, being a lipophilic molecule, it is distributed into fat tissues, from where it redistributes into the systemic circulation. In the past, both bottom-up (Physiologically based pharmacokinetic, PBPK) and top-down approaches (population pharmacokinetic, popPK) were applied to describe its pharmacokinetics (PK). In this work, a combination of the two was used to check their performance to describe PK in children and neonates (both term and preterm) using propofol as a case compound. First, in vitro data was generated in human liver microsomes and recombinant enzymes and used to develop an adult PBPK model in Simcyp®. Activity adjustment factors (AAFs) were calculated to account for differences between in vitro and in vivo enzyme activity. Clinical data were analyzed using a 3-compartment model in NONMEM. These data were used to construct a retrograde PBPK model and for qualification of the PBPK models. Once an accurate in vivo clearance was obtained accounting for the contribution of the different metabolic pathways, the resulting PBPK models were challenged with new data for qualification. After that, the constructed adult PPBK model for propofol was extrapolated to the pediatric population. Both the default built-in and in vivo derived ontogeny functions were used to do so. The models were qualified by comparing their predicted PK parameters to published values, and by comparison of predicted concentration-time profiles to available clinical data. Clearance values were predicted well, especially when compared with values obtained from trials where long-term sampling was applied, whereas volume of distribution was lower compared to the most common popPK model predictions. Concentration-time profiles were predicted well up until and including the preterm neonatal population. In this work, it was thus shown that PBPK can be used to predict the PK up to and including the preterm neonatal population without the use of pediatric in vivo data. This work adds weight to the need for further development of PBPK models, especially regarding distribution modeling and the use of in vivo derived ontogeny functions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Activity adjustment factor; IVIVE; In vivo ontogeny; Neonates; PBPK; Pediatrics; Propofol; Retrograde modeling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30298439     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-018-9607-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  86 in total

1.  Characterization of in vitro glucuronidation clearance of a range of drugs in human kidney microsomes: comparison with liver and intestinal glucuronidation and impact of albumin.

Authors:  Katherine L Gill; J Brian Houston; Aleksandra Galetin
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.922

Review 2.  An integrated approach to model hepatic drug clearance.

Authors:  Lichuan Liu; K Sandy Pang
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 4.384

Review 3.  The development of medicines for children. Part of a series on Pediatric Pharmacology, guest edited by Gianvincenzo Zuccotti, Emilio Clementi, and Massimo Molteni.

Authors:  Francesca Rocchi; Paolo Tomasi
Journal:  Pharmacol Res       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 7.658

4.  Application of physiology-based pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling to individualized target-controlled propofol infusions.

Authors:  Andrea N Edginton; Walter Schmitt; Stefan Willmann
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2006 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models in the prediction of oral drug exposure over the entire pediatric age range-sotalol as a model drug.

Authors:  Feras Khalil; Stephanie Läer
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 4.009

6.  Cytochrome P-450 2B6 is responsible for interindividual variability of propofol hydroxylation by human liver microsomes.

Authors:  M H Court; S X Duan; L M Hesse; K Venkatakrishnan; D J Greenblatt
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Pharmacokinetics of propofol in young children after a single dose.

Authors:  C Saint-Maurice; I D Cockshott; E J Douglas; M O Richard; J L Harmey
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  Population pharmacokinetics of propofol: a multicenter study.

Authors:  J Schüttler; H Ihmsen
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  The pharmacokinetics of propofol in children using three different data analysis approaches.

Authors:  B K Kataria; S A Ved; H F Nicodemus; G R Hoy; D Lea; M Y Dubois; J W Mandema; S L Shafer
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Evaluation of changes in oral drug absorption in preterm and term neonates for Biopharmaceutics Classification System (BCS) class I and II compounds.

Authors:  Amit A Somani; Kirstin Thelen; Songmao Zheng; Mirjam N Trame; Katrin Coboeken; Michaela Meyer; Katrin Schnizler; Ibrahim Ince; Stefan Willmann; Stephan Schmidt
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.335

View more
  7 in total

1.  Enzyme Kinetics of Uridine Diphosphate Glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs).

Authors:  Jin Zhou; Upendra A Argikar; John O Miners
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

2.  Preterm Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model. Part II: Applications of the Model to Predict Drug Pharmacokinetics in the Preterm Population.

Authors:  Khaled Abduljalil; Xian Pan; Amita Pansari; Masoud Jamei; Trevor N Johnson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  A physiologically based pharmacokinetic analysis to predict the pharmacokinetics of intravenous isavuconazole in patients with or without hepatic impairment.

Authors:  Huiping Huang; Helin Xie; Nupur Chaphekar; Ruichao Xu; Raman Venkataramanan; Xuemei Wu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  The Blind Spot of Pharmacology: A Scoping Review of Drug Metabolism in Prematurely Born Children.

Authors:  Mette Louise Mørk; Jón Trærup Andersen; Ulrik Lausten-Thomsen; Christina Gade
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 5.810

5.  Towards the Elucidation of the Pharmacokinetics of Voriconazole: A Quantitative Characterization of Its Metabolism.

Authors:  Josefine Schulz; Antonia Thomas; Ayatallah Saleh; Gerd Mikus; Charlotte Kloft; Robin Michelet
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 6.321

6.  Propofol use in newborns and children: is it safe? A systematic review.

Authors:  Eduardo Mekitarian Filho; Mariana Barbosa Riechelmann
Journal:  J Pediatr (Rio J)       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.990

7.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling of treprostinil after intravenous injection and extended-release oral tablet administration in healthy volunteers: An extrapolation to other patient populations including patients with hepatic impairment.

Authors:  Xuemei Wu; Xiaohan Zhang; Ruichao Xu; Imam Hussain Shaik; Raman Venkataramanan
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 3.716

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.