Literature DB >> 30298289

Red bone marrow dose estimation using several internal dosimetry models for prospective dosimetry-oriented radioiodine therapy.

Mohammad Abuqbeitah1, Mustafa Demir2, İffet Çavdar3, Handan Tanyildizi3,4, Nami Yeyin2, Lebriz Uslu-Beşli2, Levent Kabasakal2, Nazenin İpek Işıkcı5, Kerim Sönmezoğlu2.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to review the available models developed for calculating red bone marrow dose in radioiodine therapy using clinical data. The study includes 18 patients (12 females and six males) with metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer. Radioiodine tracer of 73 ± 16 MBq 131I was orally administered, followed by blood sampling (2 ml) and whole-body scans (WBSs) done at several time points (2, 6, 24, 48, 72, and ≥ 96 h). Red bone marrow dose was estimated using the OLINDA/EXM 1.0, IDAC-Dose 2.1, and EANM models, the models developed by Shen and co-workers, Keizer and co-workers and Siegel and co-workers, and Traino and co-workers, as well as the single measurement model (SMM). The results were then compared to the standard reference model Revised Sgouros Model (RSM) reported by Wessels and co-workers. The mean dose deviations of the Traino, Siegel, Shen, Keizer, OLINDA/EXM, EANM, SMM, and IDAC-Dose 2.1 models from the RSM were - 17%, - 24%, 6%, - 29%, - 15%, 40%, 48%, and - 8%, respectively. The statistical analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the results obtained with the RSM and with those obtained with the Shen, Traino, OLINDA/EXM, and IDAC-Dose 2.1 models (t test; pvalue > 0.05). However, a significant difference was found between RSM doses and those obtained with the EANM, SMM, and Keizer models (t test; pvalue < 0.05). The correlation between red marrow dose from the SMM and EANM models was modest (R2 = 0.65), while the crossfire dose calculated with the OLINDA/EXM and IDAC-Dose 2.1 models were in good agreement with each other and with the reference model. The findings obtained indicate that most of the dosimetry models can be used for a reliable dosimetry, and the calculated total body doses can be considered as a reliable non-invasive option for a conservative activity planning. In addition, the excellent performance of the IDAC-Dose 2.1 model will be of particular importance for a practical and accurate dosimetry, with the advantages of allowing for the use of realistic advanced phantoms and updated dose fractions, and of providing information about the blood dose contribution to the red bone marrow.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dosimetry models; IDAC-Dose 2.1; Radioiodine therapy; Red marrow

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30298289     DOI: 10.1007/s00411-018-0757-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys        ISSN: 0301-634X            Impact factor:   1.925


  33 in total

Review 1.  Clinical review 128: Current approaches to primary therapy for papillary and follicular thyroid cancer.

Authors:  E L Mazzaferri; R T Kloos
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.958

2.  S values for 131I based on the ICRP adult voxel phantoms.

Authors:  Stephanie Lamart; Steven L Simon; Andre Bouville; Brian E Moroz; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 0.972

3.  Interpretation of measured red cell mass and plasma volume in adults: Expert Panel on Radionuclides of the International Council for Standardization in Haematology.

Authors:  T C Pearson; D L Guthrie; J Simpson; S Chinn; G Barosi; A Ferrant; S M Lewis; Y Najean
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.998

4.  OLINDA/EXM: the second-generation personal computer software for internal dose assessment in nuclear medicine.

Authors:  Michael G Stabin; Richard B Sparks; Eric Crowe
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Comparison of internal dosimetry factors for three classes of adult computational phantoms with emphasis on I-131 in the thyroid.

Authors:  Stephanie Lamart; Andre Bouville; Steven L Simon; Keith F Eckerman; Dunstana Melo; Choonsik Lee
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Guidelines for radioiodine therapy of differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  M Luster; S E Clarke; M Dietlein; M Lassmann; P Lind; W J G Oyen; J Tennvall; E Bombardieri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Blood dosimetry from a single measurement of the whole body radioiodine retention in patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

Authors:  Heribert Hänscheid; Michael Lassmann; Markus Luster; Richard T Kloos; Christoph Reiners
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 5.678

8.  Bone marrow dosimetry and safety of high 131I activities given after recombinant human thyroid-stimulating hormone to treat metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Bart de Keizer; Anne Hoekstra; Mark W Konijnenberg; Filip de Vos; Bieke Lambert; Peter P van Rijk; Cees J M Lips; John M H de Klerk
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  EANM Dosimetry Committee series on standard operational procedures for pre-therapeutic dosimetry I: blood and bone marrow dosimetry in differentiated thyroid cancer therapy.

Authors:  Michael Lassmann; Heribert Hänscheid; Carlo Chiesa; Cecilia Hindorf; Glenn Flux; Markus Luster
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Clinical radionuclide therapy dosimetry: the quest for the "Holy Gray".

Authors:  B Brans; L Bodei; F Giammarile; O Linden; M Luster; W J G Oyen; J Tennvall
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 9.236

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Auger electrons for cancer therapy - a review.

Authors:  Anthony Ku; Valerie J Facca; Zhongli Cai; Raymond M Reilly
Journal:  EJNMMI Radiopharm Chem       Date:  2019-10-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.