Literature DB >> 30298229

Characterisation of cattle anal odour constituents associated with the repellency of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus.

Margaret W Kariuki1, Ahmed Hassanali2, Margaret M Ng'ang'a2.   

Abstract

Adults of the Brown Ear Tick (Rhipicephalus appendiculatus) have a predilection for feeding inside and around the ears of cattle and other hosts. A previous study has shown that the tick locates the host ears by 'push-pull' deployment of a repellent blend emitted at the anal region and an attractant blend emitted at the ears. Interestingly, the two odours play reverse roles with Rhipicephalus evertsi, which prefer to feed around the anal region. The present study was undertaken to characterize the major constituents of the cattle anal odour and to evaluate their repellence to R. appendiculatus. The anal odour was trapped with reverse-phase C18-bonded silica, Porapak Q and Super Q placed in an oven bag attached at the anal region of the cattle for 6 h. The adsorbents were then removed and extracted with dichloromethane, and the extracted compounds analyzed by linked gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The major constituents of the odour were o-xylene, 4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone, 4-methyl-2-methoxyphenol, ethylbenzene, 2,6,6-trimethyl-[1S(1α,β,5α)]bicycloheptanes, 5-ethoxydihydro-2(3H)-furanone, 3-methylene-2-pentanone, 5-methyl-2-phenyl-1H-indole, and 3-pentanone. The repellency of the available compounds (o-xylene, 4-hydroxy-4-methyl-2-pentanone, 4-methyl-2-methoxyphenol, ethyl benzene, 3-methylene-2-pentanone, and 3-pentanone) and blends was evaluated using a dual choice tick climbing assay at different doses. The anal odour showed repellence with RD75 of 0.39. Of the compounds tested, 4-methyl-2-methoxyphenol was found to be most repellent (RD75 = 0.56) and 3-pentanone least repellent (RD75 = 622.7). The blend of the six constituents showed RD75 of 0.34, comparable to that of the crude anal odour blend. A series of subtractive bioassays with one constituent of the 6-component blend missing was also carried out. Subtraction of 3-methylpentanone gave the most repellent blend (RD75 = 0.097), whereas subtraction of 4-methylguaiacol gave the least repellent blend (RD75 = 160.7) consistent with the high individual activity of this phenol. The study lays down useful groundwork for on-host deployment of controlled-release of a selected repellent or blend to disrupt the tick's ability to locate its preferred feeding site.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Active constituents and blends; Composition; Repellence of cattle anal odour; Rhipicephalus appendiculatus

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30298229     DOI: 10.1007/s10493-018-0304-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol        ISSN: 0168-8162            Impact factor:   2.132


  11 in total

1.  Licking behaviour and environmental contamination arising from pour-on ivermectin for cattle.

Authors:  C M Laffont; M Alvinerie; A Bousquet-Mélou; P L Toutain
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.981

Review 2.  Practical approaches to plant volatile analysis.

Authors:  Dorothea Tholl; Wilhelm Boland; Armin Hansel; Francesco Loreto; Ursula S R Röse; Jörg-Peter Schnitzler
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.417

Review 3.  Integrated control of ticks and tick-borne diseases of cattle in Africa.

Authors:  A S Young; C M Groocock; D P Kariuki
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 3.234

4.  Repellency of tsetse-refractory waterbuck (Kobus defassa) body odour to Glossina pallidipes (Diptera: Glossinidae): assessment of relative contribution of different classes and individual constituents.

Authors:  Mathew K Bett; Rajinder K Saini; Ahmed Hassanali
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.112

5.  Cryopreservation of infective particles of Theileria parva.

Authors:  M P Cunningham; C G Brown; M J Burridge; R E Purnell
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 3.981

6.  An outbreak of East Coast Fever on the Comoros: a consequence of the import of immunised cattle from Tanzania?

Authors:  R De Deken; V Martin; A Saido; M Madder; J Brandt; D Geysen
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2006-09-25       Impact factor: 2.738

Review 7.  Present and future technologies for tick control.

Authors:  J E George
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 5.691

8.  Control of ticks resistant to immunization with Bm86 in cattle vaccinated with the recombinant antigen Bm95 isolated from the cattle tick, Boophilus microplus.

Authors:  J C García-García; C Montero; M Redondo; M Vargas; M Canales; O Boue; M Rodríguez; M Joglar; H Machado; I L González; M Valdés; L Méndez; J de la Fuente
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2000-04-28       Impact factor: 3.641

9.  Responses of Glossina pallidipes and Glossina morsitans morsitans tsetse flies to analogues of δ-octalactone and selected blends.

Authors:  Benson M Wachira; Paul O Mireji; Sylvance Okoth; Margaret M Ng'ang'a; Julius M William; Grace A Murilla; Ahmed Hassanali
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.112

10.  A 4-alkyl-substituted analogue of guaiacol shows greater repellency to savannah tsetse (Glossina spp.).

Authors:  Rajindar K Saini; Ahmed Hassanali
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 2.793

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.