Literature DB >> 30298168

Implementing Frailty Measures in the Canadian Healthcare System.

D B Rolfson1, G A Heckman, S M Bagshaw, D Robertson, J P Hirdes.   

Abstract

Canadian healthcare is changing to include individuals living with frailty, but frailty must be better operationalized and better framed by sound data standards and policy. Frailty results from deficit accumulation in multiple body systems, with exaggerated vulnerability to external stressors. A growing consensus on defining frailty sets the stage for consensus on operationalization and widespread implementation in care settings. Frailty measurement is not yet integrated into daily clinical practice in Canada. Here, we will present how this integration might occur. We hope to demonstrate that implementation must appeal to inter-professional practice needs in different settings or circumstances. In some settings, methods for frailty case finding are expected to evolve as deemed to be most appropriate to the front-line users. In this "hands-off" approach, care providers, supported by emerging knowledge translation on frailty operationalization, would be informed by their setting and local practices to establish patterns of ad hoc case finding and component definition of frailty. This more nimble case finding strategy would be opportunistic, and would appeal to expert clinicians and self-directed teams who emphasize an individualized health care experience for their patients. In other settings, we can shape frailty case finding by building care algorithms around existing standardized practices and data repositories, leading to a systematic application of frailty measures and a more coordinated process of component definition and care protocols. Here, recommended instruments and data standards must be endorsed by health networks locally, provincially and nationally. The interRAI suite of assessment instruments has pan-Canadian standards in place and its pervasiveness makes it the most obvious starting point, especially in home care and long-term care. We anticipate the evolution of an integrated model informed by stakeholders and settings, where policy makers focus on system supports for frailty case finding, while front-line clinicians use case finding strategies to pinpoint and act on key frailty components.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frailty; case finding; measurement; standards

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30298168     DOI: 10.14283/jfa.2018.29

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Frailty Aging        ISSN: 2260-1341


  4 in total

1.  Mood Disturbances Across the Continuum of Care Based on Self-Report and Clinician Rated Measures in the interRAI Suite of Assessment Instruments.

Authors:  John P Hirdes; John N Morris; Christopher M Perlman; Margaret Saari; Gustavo S Betini; Manuel A Franco-Martin; Hein van Hout; Shannon L Stewart; Jason Ferris
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 5.435

2.  Frailty transitions and cognitive function among South Korean older adults.

Authors:  Fatima Nari; Bich Na Jang; Hin Moi Youn; Wonjeong Jeong; Sung-In Jang; Eun-Cheol Park
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  "Establishing the criterion validity of the interRAI Check-Up Self-Report instrument".

Authors:  Leon N Geffen; Gabrielle Kelly; John N Morris; Sophie Hogeveen; John Hirdes
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.921

4.  Beyond the revised cardiac risk index: Validation of the hospital frailty risk score in non-cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Pishoy Gouda; Xiaoming Wang; Erik Youngson; Michael McGillion; Mamas A Mamas; Michelle M Graham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.