| Literature DB >> 30297843 |
Junwen He1, Yuan Yao1, Kyu-Tae Lee2, Nina Hong3, Brent Fisher4, Rabab R Bahabry5, Jung Woo Lee6, Jeonghyun Kim7, Seungyong Han8, Sanjay V Kalidindi9, Jae-Hwan Kim10, Sung Bong Kim10, Jaewon Choi10, Hongwoo Jang10, Myeong Namkoong10, Scott Burroughs4, Muhammad Hussain11, Ralph G Nuzzo12,13, John A Rogers14.
Abstract
Concentrator photovoltaic (CPV) systems, where incident direct solar radiation is tightly concentrated onto high-efficiency multi-junction solar cells by geometric optical elements, exhibit the highest efficiencies in converting the sun's energy into electric power. Their energy conversion efficiencies are greatly limited, however, due to Fresnel reflection losses occurring at three air/optics interfaces in the most sophisticated dual-stage CPV platforms. This paper describes a facile one-step wet-etching process to create a nanoporous surface with a graded-index profile on both flat and curved glasses, with capabilities of achieving ~99% average transmission efficiency in a wide wavelength range from 380 nm to 1.3 µm and for a wide range of incident angles up to ±40° regardless of the polarization state of incident sunlight. The simplicity of the etching process remarkably increases their versatility in various optical elements that require unconventional form factors such as Fresnel lenses and microlens arrays, and/or demanding curvatures along with much reduced dimensions such as ball lenses. Etched glass surfaces on two-stage optical concentrating systems yield enhancements in total optical transmission efficiencies by 13.8% and in the photocurrent by 14.3%, as experimentally determined by measurements on microscale triple-junction solar cells. The presented strategy can be widely adapted in a variety of applications such as image sensors, display systems, and other optoelectronic devices.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30297843 PMCID: PMC6175897 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-33200-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(a) Illustration showing the etching process. (b) Atomic composition of the BK7 surface as mapped by XPS before and after the etching. (c) Cross-sectional and (d) top-view SEM images of etched BK7 glass. (e) Modeled refractive indices of the etched BK7 glass using ellipsometry data, the etched layer is equally divided into five slices in the model, showing a gradient index profile. (f) Calculated porosity of 5 slices based on effective medium approximation.
Figure 2(a) Transmission of a flat BK7 sample before (black) and after (red) the etching. (b) Angular transmission data of the etched BK7 sample. (c) Contact angles of both bare and etched flat BK7 glass samples before and after being treated with a hydrophobic flurosilane.
Figure 3Transmission data of both (a) plano-convex and (b) ball lenses before (black) and after (red) the etching; (c) I–V curves and (d) efficiency enhancements of a 3J cell using two-stage BK7 optics before and after the etching.
I–V characteristics measured under a two-stage CPV optical system.
| Voc (V) | Jsc (mA) | FF | Power (mW) | Concentration ratio (X) | Enhancements (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Representative single-point measurement | Averaged from over 4 measurements | |||||
| Bare ball & primary | 3.14 | 11.33 | 0.836 | 29.7 | 227.9 ± 1.3 | — |
| Etched ball & bare primary | 3.14 | 12.07 | 0.840 | 31.8 | 242.0 ± 0.5 | 6.2 ± 0.7 |
| Etched ball & primary | 3.14 | 13.02 | 0.845 | 34.5 | 260.5 ± 1.6 | 14.3 ± 1.0 |
Figure 4I–V data of both (a) a Fresnel lens and (b) a mirolens array couple to 3J cells before (black) and after (red) the etching.
I–V characteristics measured under a Fresnel lens and a microlens array.
| Voc (V) | Jsc (mA) | FF | Power (W) | η | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||
| No ARC | 3.02 | 17.55 | 0.835 | 0.0442 | — |
| ARC | 3.01 | 18.90 | 0.815 | 0.0463 | — |
| Δ | — | 7.69% | — | 4.73% | — |
|
| |||||
| No ARC | 88.7 | 31.5 | 0.813 | 2.27 | 28.6% |
| ARC | 89.0 | 35.0 | 0.817 | 2.55 | 32.0% |
| Δ | — | 11.1% | — | 12.1% | 11.9% |