| Literature DB >> 30297657 |
Daniil Naberezhnyi1, Marina Rumyantseva2, Darya Filatova3, Maria Batuk4, Joke Hadermann5, Alexander Baranchikov6,7, Nikolay Khmelevsky8, Anatoly Aksenenko9, Elizaveta Konstantinova10,11,12, Alexander Gaskov13.
Abstract
Nanocomposites In₂O₃/Ag obtained by ultraviolet (UV) photoreduction and impregnation methods were studied as materials for CO sensors operating in the temperature range 25⁻250 °C. Nanocrystalline In₂O₃ and In₂O₃/Ag nanocomposites were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), single-point Brunauer-Emmet-Teller (BET) method, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and high angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) with energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) mapping. The active surface sites were investigated using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy and thermo-programmed reduction with hydrogen (TPR-H₂) method. Sensor measurements in the presence of 15 ppm CO demonstrated that UV treatment leads to a complete loss of In₂O₃ sensor sensitivity, while In₂O₃/Ag-UV nanocomposite synthesized by UV photoreduction demonstrates an increased sensor signal to CO at T < 200 °C. The observed high sensor response of the In₂O₃/Ag-UV nanocomposite at room temperature may be due to the realization of an additional mechanism of CO oxidation with participation of surface hydroxyl groups associated via hydrogen bonds.Entities:
Keywords: carbon monoxide; gas sensor; indium oxide; nanocomposites; nanocrystalline semiconductor oxides; room temperature response; silver additive; surface hydroxyl groups
Year: 2018 PMID: 30297657 PMCID: PMC6215304 DOI: 10.3390/nano8100801
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.076
Figure 1(a) Scheme of synthesis of the In2O3 samples and In2O3/Ag nanocomposites. SEM (b) and TEM (c) images of In2O3 matrix.
Microstructure characteristics and composition of investigated samples.
| Sample |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| In2O3 | Ag | ||||
| In2O3 | 10 ± 1 | 5–15 ( | - | 88 ± 5 | - |
| In2O3-UV | - | - | |||
| In2O3/Ag-imp | 5–34 ( | 4.5 ± 0.4 ( | |||
| In2O3/Ag-UV | 1000–3000 ( | 1.5 ± 0.3 ( | |||
( particle size (from transmission electron microscopy, TEM); ( particle size (from scanning electron microscopy, SEM); ( obtained by ICP-MS analysis; ( obtained by X-ray fluorescence analysis.
Figure 2(a) Resistance of the In2O3 samples and In2O3/Ag nanocomposites in the temperature range 250–100 °C and at 25 °C under the periodic change of the gas phase composition. (b) Temperature dependencies of sensor signal of blank In2O3 and In2O3/Ag nanocomposites.
Figure 3XRD patterns of synthesized powders. Vertical lines correspond to the ICDD 6-416 reference (In2O3 bixbyite).
Figure 4(a) High angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM) and (b) high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images of In2O3/Ag-imp nanocomposite; (c) TEM image of a Ag nanoparticle in In2O3/Ag-imp nanocomposite and (d) Fourier transform proving its polycrystallinity.
Figure 5(a) HAADF-STEM image and (b) energy dispersive X-ray (EDX)maps of In2O3/Ag-imp nanocomposite.
Figure 6(a) EDX map of element distribution in In2O3/Ag-UV nanocomposite. (b) EDX map of corresponding Ag Lα1 signal.
Figure 7X-ray photoelectron spectra Ag 3d (a); In 3d (b); O1s (c) of the samples.
Figure 8(a) FTIR spectra of In2O3 and In2O3/Ag nanocomposites normalized to the intensity In–O oscillations. (b) FTIR spectra of In2O3 and In2O3/Ag nanocomposites pretreated under different relative humidity RH = 65% and RH = 5%.
Figure 9(a) TPR-H2 profiles of In2O3 and In2O3/Ag nanocomposites; (b) EPR spectra of In2O3-UV sample in dark conditions, under UV illumination and in 20 min after that.
The results of the TPR-H2 experiments.
| Sample | Hydrogen Cnsumption, mol H2 per 1 mol In2O3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | at 25–370 °C | at 370–850 °C | ||
| In2O3 | 4.0 ± 0.5 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 590 |
| In2O3-UV | 3.6 ± 0.5 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 3.2 ± 0.5 | 530 |
| In2O3/Ag-imp | 3.9 ± 0.5 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 3.4 ± 0.5 | 600 |
| In2O3/Ag-UV | 3.5 ± 0.5 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 2.9 ± 0.5 | 550 |
Figure 10Schematic representation of the modifier effect on In2O3/Ag nanocomposites interaction with CO in air at room temperature.