| Literature DB >> 30297391 |
David A Keiser1,2, Catherine L Kling3, Joseph S Shapiro4,5.
Abstract
US investment to decrease pollution in rivers, lakes, and other surface waters has exceeded $1.9 trillion since 1960, and has also exceeded the cost of most other US environmental initiatives. These investments come both from the 1972 Clean Water Act and the largely voluntary efforts to control pollution from agriculture and urban runoff. This paper reviews the methods and conclusions of about 20 recent evaluations of these policies. Surprisingly, most analyses estimate that these policies' benefits are much smaller than their costs; the benefit-cost ratio from the median study is 0.37. However, existing evidence is limited and undercounts many types of benefits. We conclude that it is unclear whether many of these regulations truly fail a benefit-cost test or whether existing evidence understates their net benefits; we also describe specific questions that when answered would help eliminate this uncertainty.Entities:
Keywords: Clean Water Act; cost effectiveness analysis; cost–benefit analysis; environmental regulation; water pollution
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30297391 PMCID: PMC6431143 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1802870115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205