Literature DB >> 30297147

Urinary phthalate metabolites and metabolic syndrome in U.S. adolescents: Cross-sectional results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2003-2014) data.

Symielle A Gaston1, Nicolle S Tulve2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There is limited research on the association between phthalates and metabolic syndrome (MetS). Among adolescents, phthalate exposure, which can occur from multiple sources, has been linked to several risk factors for MetS. The objective was to investigate the association between urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations (i.e., mono-ethyl phthalate (MEP), mono-n-butyl phthalate (MnBP), mono-isobutyl phthalate (MiBP), mono-benzyl phthalate (MBzP), mono-(3-carboxylpropyl) phthalate (MCPP), and di(2-ethylhexyl phthalate (DEHP)) and MetS in adolescents aged 12-19 years using the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data (2003-2014). A secondary aim was to assess if observed associations varied by a measure of socioeconomic status, economic adversity, which was defined using parental income and educational attainment as well as household food security.
METHODS: We used NHANES data which included physical examination, laboratory urinalysis and fasting blood profiles, and self-reported health characteristics and demographics. Physical examination and laboratory data were used to obtain values of MetS components and urinary phthalate metabolites. We created age-, sex-, and survey year-specific tertiles of creatinine-corrected urinary phthalate metabolites. Analysis was performed using appropriate weighting procedures that accounted for NHANES' complex sampling design. After univariate and bivariate analyses, we performed adjusted logistic regressions to test for associations between individual phthalate metabolites and MetS as well as MetS components and number of MetS components, separately, using the lowest tertile as the reference category. A cross-product term (phthalate metabolite*economic adversity) was subsequently added to adjusted models.
RESULTS: Among 918 participants (mean age 16 years, 45% female, 18% with economic adversity), the prevalence of MetS was 5.3%. Prior to adjustment, adolescents with MetS had marginally higher concentrations of phthalate metabolites than adolescents without MetS. There was a suggestive positive association between intermediate concentrations of MnBP and odds of MetS after adjustment (T2: Odds Ratio (OR) = 2.66 (95% confidence interval: 0.98-7.24); T3: OR = 2.11 (0.71-6.27)). Males with higher MnBP concentrations had higher odds of dyslipidemia; however, associations were mostly non-significant for females. Relationships between MiBP concentrations and odds of MetS varied by sex. Males with higher concentrations of MnBP and MiBP had greater odds of having a higher number of MetS components. Relationships between phthalate metabolites and MetS did not vary by economic adversity.
CONCLUSION: There was a suggestive positive association between MnBP and MetS among adolescents. Associations between phthalate metabolites and MetS as well as MetS components may vary by sex, but may not vary by economic adversity. Further research of the relationships between phthalate exposures, MetS, and potential interactions with socioeconomic factors is warranted.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  31736); 53435014); 75318); 8343); 8575); 92272); Adolescent; Di(2-ethylhexyl phthalate) (PubChem CID; Metabolic syndrome; Mono-(3-carboxypropyl) phthalate (PubChem CID; Mono-n-butyl phthalate (PubChem CID; Monobenzyl phthalate (PubChem CID; Monoethyl phthalate (PubChem CID; Monoisobutyl phthalate (PubChem CID; Phthalates; Socioeconomic status

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30297147     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheh.2018.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health        ISSN: 1438-4639            Impact factor:   5.840


  8 in total

Review 1.  Synthetic Chemicals and Cardiometabolic Health Across the Life Course Among Vulnerable Populations: a Review of the Literature from 2018 to 2019.

Authors:  Symielle A Gaston; Linda S Birnbaum; Chandra L Jackson
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2020-03

2.  Association of exposure to phthalates with cardiometabolic risk factors in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohsen Golestanzadeh; Roya Riahi; Roya Kelishadi
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Could phthalates exposure contribute to the development of metabolic syndrome and liver disease in humans?

Authors:  Nataša Milošević; Maja Milanović; Jan Sudji; Dragana Bosić Živanović; Stefan Stojanoski; Bojan Vuković; Nataša Milić; Milica Medić Stojanoska
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Association between Heavy Metals, Bisphenol A, Volatile Organic Compounds and Phthalates and Metabolic Syndrome.

Authors:  Yun Hwa Shim; Jung Won Ock; Yoon-Ji Kim; Youngki Kim; Se Yeong Kim; Dongmug Kang
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-25       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 5.  Plasticizers and Cardiovascular Health: Role of Adipose Tissue Dysfunction.

Authors:  Mikyla A Callaghan; Samuel Alatorre-Hinojosa; Liam T Connors; Radha D Singh; Jennifer A Thompson
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Sex Differences between Urinary Phthalate Metabolites and Metabolic Syndrome in Adults: A Cross-Sectional Taiwan Biobank Study.

Authors:  Ya-Ling Shih; Chia-Jung Hsieh; Tso-Ying Lee; Pei-Hung Liao; Hao-Ting Wu; Chieh-Yu Liu
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 7.  Critical Review on the Presence of Phthalates in Food and Evidence of Their Biological Impact.

Authors:  Angela Giuliani; Mariachiara Zuccarini; Angelo Cichelli; Haroon Khan; Marcella Reale
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 8.  Metabolic Syndrome and Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals: An Overview of Exposure and Health Effects.

Authors:  Elsi Haverinen; Mariana F Fernandez; Vicente Mustieles; Hanna Tolonen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.