Kumara Raja Sundar1. 1. Family Medicine Resident at Kaiser Permanente of Washington in Seattle (raj.r.sundar@kp.org).
Abstract
CONTEXT: Kaiser Permanente's Care Management Institute created a screening tool, Your Current Life Situation (YCLS), which primarily is used to identify social needs for populations at risk of high health care utilization. OBJECTIVE: This frontline improvement project was designed to address key stakeholder concerns about implementing universal screening for social needs using the YCLS in a primary care clinic. METHODS: I conducted a rapid stakeholder analysis through informal conversations to identify the most important concerns. Four Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were conducted to answer stakeholder questions and address concerns. RESULTS: Stakeholders expressed concerns including YCLS length and low screening acceptability and the possibility that too few or too many patients may have social needs. Throughout the project's duration, 125 office visits occurred and 111 patients were screened. Among the patients for whom findings were positive, 27% requested help. Of the 14 patients who were not screened, only 1 patient opted out of screening. Practitioners and medical assistants stated that administration of the YCLS screening tool did not disrupt clinic workflow. CONCLUSION: By using a frontline improvement approach, these investigators could answer questions and address concerns most important to local operational stakeholders when implementing screening for social needs. When practitioners conduct universal social needs screening and more fully understand social needs prevalence in a primary care clinic, resources can be tailored more effectively to accommodate patient needs.
CONTEXT: Kaiser Permanente's Care Management Institute created a screening tool, Your Current Life Situation (YCLS), which primarily is used to identify social needs for populations at risk of high health care utilization. OBJECTIVE: This frontline improvement project was designed to address key stakeholder concerns about implementing universal screening for social needs using the YCLS in a primary care clinic. METHODS: I conducted a rapid stakeholder analysis through informal conversations to identify the most important concerns. Four Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were conducted to answer stakeholder questions and address concerns. RESULTS: Stakeholders expressed concerns including YCLS length and low screening acceptability and the possibility that too few or too many patients may have social needs. Throughout the project's duration, 125 office visits occurred and 111 patients were screened. Among the patients for whom findings were positive, 27% requested help. Of the 14 patients who were not screened, only 1 patient opted out of screening. Practitioners and medical assistants stated that administration of the YCLS screening tool did not disrupt clinic workflow. CONCLUSION: By using a frontline improvement approach, these investigators could answer questions and address concerns most important to local operational stakeholders when implementing screening for social needs. When practitioners conduct universal social needs screening and more fully understand social needs prevalence in a primary care clinic, resources can be tailored more effectively to accommodate patient needs.
Authors: Areej Hassan; Emily A Blood; Aaron Pikcilingis; Emily G Krull; LaQuita McNickles; Glenn Marmon; Sarah Wylie; Elizabeth R Woods; Eric W Fleegler Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2013-05-01 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Karen M Freund; Jennifer S Haas; Stephenie C Lemon; Karen Burns White; Nicole Casanova; Laura S Dominici; John K Erban; Rachel A Freedman; Ted A James; Naomi Y Ko; Amy M LeClair; Beverly Moy; Susan K Parsons; Tracy A Battaglia Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-08-26 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Julie C Lauffenburger; Thomas Isaac; Romit Bhattacharya; Thomas D Sequist; Chandrasekar Gopalakrishnan; Niteesh K Choudhry Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2019-11-07 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Jessa K Engelberg Anderson; Purva Jain; Amy J Wade; Andrea M Morris; Jill C Slaboda; Gregory J Norman Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2020-01-06 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Stephanie L Fitzpatrick; Dea Papajorgji-Taylor; Jennifer L Schneider; Nangel Lindberg; Melanie Francisco; Ning Smith; Katie Vaughn; Elizabeth A Vrany; Felicia Hill-Briggs Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2022-07-18 Impact factor: 3.626
Authors: Erin S Rogers; Marc I Rosen; Brian Elbel; Binhuan Wang; Kelly Kyanko; Elizabeth Vargas; Christina N Wysota; Scott E Sherman Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-01-11 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Jennifer Tsui; Annie Yang; Bianca Anuforo; Jolene Chou; Ruth Brogden; Binghong Xu; Joel C Cantor; Su Wang Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2021-05-28
Authors: Chanita Hughes Halbert; Melanie Jefferson; Caitlin G Allen; Oluwole A Babatunde; Richard Drake; Peggi Angel; Stephen J Savage; Lewis Frey; Michael Lilly; Ted Obi; Jihad Obeid Journal: JCO Clin Cancer Inform Date: 2021-06