Matthew J W Thomas1, Jessica L Paterson1, Sarah M Jay1, Raymond W Matthews1,2,3, Sally A Ferguson1. 1. a Appleton Institute for Behavioural Science, School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences , Central Queensland University , Adelaide , Australia. 2. b Department of Clinical Neuroscience , Karolinska Institute , Stockholm , Sweden. 3. c Stress Research Institute , Stockholm University , Stockholm , Sweden.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study examines the impacts of peak summer demand on operator workload and fatigue in a maritime environment. METHODS: Participants (n = 12) were senior shipboard personnel who were working during the summer "double sailing" period for a roll-on roll-off ferry service. Wrist actigraphy was used to determine sleep opportunity and sleep duration, as well as prior sleep, total wake time, performance and alertness at the beginning and end of work periods. RESULTS: Contrary to expectations, sleep was significantly greater, and both subjective estimates of fatigue and objective neurobehavioral performance were not impacted negatively by periods of increased work intensity. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights a number of features of a fatigue-risk management system that appear to have been instrumental in ensuring adequate sleep and performance was maintained throughout periods of increased operational intensity. As a simple colloquial description of the fatigue-risk management system at play in this operation, it was fine to "work hard" if you were able to "sleep hard" as well.
OBJECTIVES: This study examines the impacts of peak summer demand on operator workload and fatigue in a maritime environment. METHODS:Participants (n = 12) were senior shipboard personnel who were working during the summer "double sailing" period for a roll-on roll-off ferry service. Wrist actigraphy was used to determine sleep opportunity and sleep duration, as well as prior sleep, total wake time, performance and alertness at the beginning and end of work periods. RESULTS: Contrary to expectations, sleep was significantly greater, and both subjective estimates of fatigue and objective neurobehavioral performance were not impacted negatively by periods of increased work intensity. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights a number of features of a fatigue-risk management system that appear to have been instrumental in ensuring adequate sleep and performance was maintained throughout periods of increased operational intensity. As a simple colloquial description of the fatigue-risk management system at play in this operation, it was fine to "work hard" if you were able to "sleep hard" as well.
Authors: Fiona Kerkamm; Dorothee Dengler; Matthias Eichler; Danuta Materzok-Köppen; Lukas Belz; Felix Alexander Neumann; Birgit Christiane Zyriax; Volker Harth; Marcus Oldenburg Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-12-23 Impact factor: 3.390