| Literature DB >> 30296055 |
Verena A Hintermayr1,2, Lakshminarayana Polavarapu1,2, Alexander S Urban1,2, Jochen Feldmann1,2.
Abstract
For high-speed optoelectronic applications relying on fast relaxation or energy-transfer mechanisms, understanding of carrier relaxation and recombination dynamics is critical. Here, we compare the differences in photoexcited carrier dynamics in two-dimensional (2D) and quasi-three-dimensional (quasi-3D) colloidal methylammonium lead iodide perovskite nanoplatelets via differential transmission spectroscopy. We find that the cooling of excited electron-hole pairs by phonon emission progresses much faster and is intensity-independent in the 2D case. This is due to the low dielectric surrounding of the thin perovskite layers, for which the Fröhlich interaction is screened less efficiently leading to higher and less density-dependent carrier-phonon scattering rates. In addition, rapid dissipation of heat into the surrounding occurs due to the high surface-to-volume ratio. Furthermore, we observe a subpicosecond dissociation of resonantly excited 1s excitons in the quasi-3D case, an effect which is suppressed in the 2D nanoplatelets due to their large exciton binding energies. The results highlight the importance of the surrounding environment of the inorganic nanoplatelets on their relaxation dynamics. Moreover, this 2D material with relaxation times in the subpicosecond regime shows great potential for realizing devices such as photodetectors or all-optical switches operating at THz frequencies.Entities:
Keywords: Coulomb screening; Fröhlich interaction; carrier relaxation; nanoplatelets; perovskite; transient absorption spectroscopy
Year: 2018 PMID: 30296055 PMCID: PMC6202634 DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b05029
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Nano ISSN: 1936-0851 Impact factor: 15.881
Figure 1Energetics and charge carrier recombination of 2D and quasi-3D MAPI NPls. (a) Steady-state absorption and PL spectra of quasi-3D (purple) and 2D (orange) NPls. The corresponding values of the exciton binding energies Eb are shown as arrows in the absorption spectra. (b) Dispersion relations E(K) for bound and unbound electron–hole pairs. Within this two-particle picture K represents the wave vector for the center-of-mass motion of electron–hole pairs. (c, d) Transients of the ΔT/T signals at the 1s exciton for the quasi-3D (c) and 2D case (d) as a function of laser excitation density (here shown for a monolayer nanoplatelet). The solid lines are the results of calculated transients assuming bimolecular decay kinetics (ΔT ∼ ne × nh) and monomolecular decay kinetics (ΔT ∼ n) for the 3D and 2D case, respectively. On the right side, the corresponding recombination process is depicted for the quasi-3D in the one-particle (c) and for the 2D case in the two-particle (d) picture, respectively.
Figure 2Photoexcited charge carrier cooling. (a) Scheme of the thermalization and relaxation of photoexcited electrons and holes in the one-particle picture. The initially independent δ-like distribution functions are depicted for electrons in the conduction band and holes in the valence band. Directly after thermalization the carriers assume a (hot) thermal distribution f(E)hot (red). f(E)eq (blue) describes the distribution when the charge carriers have cooled down sufficiently to reach equilibrium with the crystal lattice. (b, c) Normalized ΔT spectra with increasing time delays from 0.3 to 30 ps for the quasi-3D (b) and 2D (c) case. In the inset of (c) the ΔT spectra are redrawn normalized to the values at the continuum absorption onset. (d) Transients of the carrier temperature Tc (cooling curves) as calculated from eq 3 for the quasi-3D and the 2D sample. The dashed lines represent calculated exponential decays with time constants of 1.7 ps and 240 fs, nicely resembling the experimentally obtained cooling curves. (e, f) Photon fluence-dependent measurements of the cooling curves for quasi-3D (e) and 2D (f) NPls.
Figure 3Scheme of carrier cooling processes in thick (quasi-3D) and thin (2D) NPls. After photoexcitation, the carriers cool down via emission of LO-phonons. As described in the main text, both screening effects and larger surface-to-volume ratios explain why in the 2D case, carrier cooling is faster and a dependence on carrier density is not observed.
Figure 4Resonant and nonresonant excitation of the 1s exciton transition. (a, b) Scheme of charge carrier relaxation after nonresonant (high energy) excitation of the quasi-3D (a) and 2D (b) NPls. Relaxation occurs predominantly via the emission of optical phonons. (c) Corresponding ΔT transients for the quasi-3D (purple) and 2D (orange) NPls. (d, e) Scheme of excitonic dynamics after resonant excitation of the 1s exciton transition for quasi-3D (d) and 2D (e) NPls, respectively. (f) Corresponding ΔT transients for the quasi-3D (purple) and 2D (orange) NPls. The inset in (f) shows the heating of resonantly excited “cold” 1s excitons at longer times.