Literature DB >> 30295951

Estimating onset time from longitudinal data in the presence of measurement error with application to estimating gestational age from maternal anthropometry during pregnancy.

Ana M Ortega-Villa1, Paul S Albert1.   

Abstract

Accurate assessment of gestational age at birth is necessary for optimal pediatric care. In high resource countries, several methods using ultrasound have been proposed to assess gestational age at birth; however, these methods are not easily accessible for low-resource populations. We develop a shared random parameter model for estimating gestational age at birth from longitudinal maternal anthropometry that incorporates additional maternal information from the last menstrual period, a measure of gestational age collected with sizable measurement error. The proposed methodology is evaluated using simulation studies under a training-test set paradigm. In addition, we propose methodology to validate prediction when some measurements of the gold standard are collected with measurement error. We illustrate the proposed methodologies with data from the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies. Published 2018. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  measurement error; onset time estimation; prediction; validation under measurement error

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30295951      PMCID: PMC6497444          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  8 in total

1.  Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation.

Authors:  P Taipale; V Hiilesmaa
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Discordance between LMP-based and clinically estimated gestational age: implications for research, programs, and policy.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M E Tompkins; D J Petersen; T C Hulsey; J Mor
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

3.  Estimating the date of confinement: ultrasonographic biometry versus certain menstrual dates.

Authors:  M Mongelli; M Wilcox; J Gardosi
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data.

Authors:  N M Laird; J H Ware
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Racial/ethnic standards for fetal growth: the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Jagteshwar Grewal; Paul S Albert; Anthony Sciscione; Deborah A Wing; William A Grobman; Roger B Newman; Ronald Wapner; Mary E D'Alton; Daniel Skupski; Michael P Nageotte; Angela C Ranzini; John Owen; Edward K Chien; Sabrina Craigo; Mary L Hediger; Sungduk Kim; Cuilin Zhang; Katherine L Grantz
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Estimating onset time from longitudinal and cross-sectional data with an application to estimating gestational age from longitudinal maternal anthropometry during pregnancy and neonatal anthropometry at birth.

Authors:  Ana Maria Ortega-Villa; Katherine L Grantz; Paul S Albert
Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc       Date:  2017-08-28       Impact factor: 2.483

7.  Estimation of gestational age from fundal height: a solution for resource-poor settings.

Authors:  Lisa J White; Sue J Lee; Kasia Stepniewska; Julie A Simpson; Saw Lu Mu Dwell; Ratree Arunjerdja; Pratap Singhasivanon; Nicholas J White; Francois Nosten; Rose McGready
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 4.118

8.  Perceived barriers in the use of ultrasound in developing countries.

Authors:  Sachita Shah; Blaise A Bellows; Adeyinka A Adedipe; Jodie E Totten; Brandon H Backlund; Dana Sajed
Journal:  Crit Ultrasound J       Date:  2015-06-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.