| Literature DB >> 30295746 |
Weerawat Phuklia1,2, Phonepasith Panyanivong2, Davanh Sengdetka2, Piengchan Sonthayanon1,3, Paul N Newton2,4, Daniel H Paris3,4,5,6, Nicholas P J Day3,4, Sabine Dittrich2,4,7.
Abstract
Objectives: To develop a method to enable the large-scale antimicrobial susceptibility screening of Orientia tsutsugamushi clinical isolates, using one timepoint and one concentration of antibiotics to considerably speed up the time to result.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30295746 PMCID: PMC6293087 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky402
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother ISSN: 0305-7453 Impact factor: 5.790
List of O. tsutsugamushi reference strains and in vitro antibiotic susceptibility reports used in the development of the standardized AST method
| Strain | Country of isolation (year) | Doxycycline | Azithromycin | Chloramphenicol | Ofloxacin | Reference(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karp | New Guinea (1943) | S | S | S | NA | |
| Kato | Japan (1952) | S | NA | S | R | |
| Gilliam | Burma (1944) | S | NA | S | NA | |
| UT76 | Thailand (2003) | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| TA763 | Thailand (1963) | NA | NA | NA | NA | |
| AFC-3 | Thailand (1991) | R | NA | S | NA | |
| AFSC-4 | Thailand (1990) | R | S | NA | NA | |
| AFSC-7 | Thailand (1990) | R | NA | NA | NA |
NA, antibiotic susceptibility reports not available; S, susceptible; R, resistant.
Figure 1.Comparison of variation between replicates of O. tsutsugamushi strain Kato growth using different harvesting methods. (a) Scraping method. (b) Trypsinization method.
Figure 2.Comparison of different mois of O. tsutsugamushi strain Kato. Bacterial infection using mois of 1000:1 (continuous line) and 100:1 (broken line) over 12 days with growth peaks at day 7 (moi = 1000:1) and at day 10 (moi = 100:1). The plotted data points represent the mean and SD of three independent experiments.
Growth data for O. tsutsugamushi strains
| Strain | Estimated doubling time (h) | Log of bacterial load (95% CI) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| day 7 | day 10 | |||
| Karp | 15.05 | 5.193 (4.791–5.595) | 5.142 (4.907–5.377) | 0.6639 |
| Kato | 19.85 | 5.593 (5.363–5.824) | 5.847 (5.732–5.961) | 0.0134 |
| Gilliam | 12.03 | 5.537 (4.999–6.077) | 5.887 (5.775–5.999) | 0.0524 |
| AFC-3 | 9.50 | 6.363 (5.650–7.076) | 6.182 (5.857–6.508) | 0.3782 |
| AFSC-4 | 10.53 | 6.221 (6.000–6.442) | 6.227 (6.050–6.404) | 0.9334 |
| TA763 | 13.89 | 5.367 (5.160–5.897) | 5.590 (4.876–6.303) | 0.6629 |
| UT76 | 14.42 | 5.444 (5.354–5.535) | 5.935 (5.113–6.756) | 0.1223 |
Statistically significant (P < 0.05).
MICs of four antibiotics for O. tsutsugamushi reference strains
| Strain | MIC (mg/L) this study/reference data | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| azithromycin | doxycycline | chloramphenicol | ofloxacin | |
| Kato | 0.0039/NA | 0.0313/NA | 2.500/1.560 | 8/8 |
| Gilliam | 0.0313/NA | 0.1250/NA | 1.250/0.781 | 8/NA |
| AFC-3 | 0.0156/NA | 0.1250/>4 | 1.250/NA | 8/NA |
| TA763 | 0.0313/NA | 0.0156/NA | 0.156/NA | 8/NA |
| UT76 | 0.0156/NA | 0.0625/NA | 1.250/NA | 8/NA |
| Karp | 0.0156/0.0078 | 0.0625/0.0625 | 2.500/1.560 | 8/NA |
| AFSC-4 | 0.0313/0.0156 | 0.250/>0.250 | 2.500/NA | 8/NA |
NA, no comparative data available in the literature.
Superscript numbers correspond to the references for these published data.
Figure 3.Distribution of MIC values of azithromycin (a), chloramphenicol (b) and doxycycline (c). The dashed line represents the best-fit line of the MIC distribution of susceptible bacterial strain observations calculated by the ECOFFinder.