Literature DB >> 30295318

New perspectives on binding in visual working memory.

Sebastian Schneegans1, Paul M Bays1.   

Abstract

How does visual working memory (WM) store the binding between different features of a visual object (like colour, orientation, and location), and does memorizing these bindings require additional resources beyond memorizing individual features? These questions have traditionally been addressed by comparing performance across different types of change detection task. More recently, experimental tasks such as analogue (cued) recall, combined with analysis methods including Bayesian hypothesis testing and formal model comparison, have shed new light on the properties of WM. A significant new perspective is that noise in neural representation limits the precision of recall, and several recent models incorporate this view to account for failures of binding in WM. We review the literature on feature binding with a focus on these new developments and discuss their implications for the interpretation of classical findings.
© 2018 The British Psychological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  binding; change detection; computational modeling; continuous report; cued recall; short-term memory; visual working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30295318     DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12345

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  10 in total

1.  The Binding Problem after an eye movement.

Authors:  Emma Wu Dowd; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Similar mechanisms of temporary bindings for identity and location of objects in healthy ageing: an eye-tracking study with naturalistic scenes.

Authors:  Giorgia D'Innocenzo; Sergio Della Sala; Moreno I Coco
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 3.  Salient Cognitive Paradigms to Assess Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Rosie E Curiel Cid; David A Loewenstein
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 6.088

4.  Does the presence of more features in a bound representation in working memory require extra object-based attention?

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Fan Wu; Xueyi Wan; Mowei Shen; Zaifeng Gao
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-05-27

5.  Modulation of the pupillary response by the content of visual working memory.

Authors:  Nahid Zokaei; Alexander G Board; Sanjay G Manohar; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Across-Area Synchronization Supports Feature Integration in a Biophysical Network Model of Working Memory.

Authors:  Joao Barbosa; Vahan Babushkin; Ainsley Temudo; Kartik K Sreenivasan; Albert Compte
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 3.492

7.  Mechanisms of feature binding in visual working memory are stable over long delays.

Authors:  Georgina Brown; Iham Kasem; Paul M Bays; Sebastian Schneegans
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Theory of neural coding predicts an upper bound on estimates of memory variability.

Authors:  Robert Taylor; Paul M Bays
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Location-independent feature binding in visual working memory for sequentially presented objects.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneegans; William J Harrison; Paul M Bays
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  A direct comparison of attentional orienting to spatial and temporal positions in visual working memory.

Authors:  Anna Heuer; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-07-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.