| Literature DB >> 30295171 |
Justin Bruno Tongun1,2, Mohamedi Boy Sebit3, Grace Ndeezi4, David Mukunya1, Thorkild Tylleskar1, James K Tumwine4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Pre-lacteal feeding (PLF) is a barrier to optimal breastfeeding and increases the risk of diarrhoea and acute respiratory tract infections in infants.The prevalence and predictors of PLF are not well studied in South Sudan. Understanding the predictors of PLF is crucial in designing interventions to increase exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) rates.Entities:
Keywords: conflict; infant; newborn; pre-lacteal feeding (PLF); predictors
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30295171 PMCID: PMC6179051 DOI: 10.1080/16549716.2018.1523304
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Glob Health Action ISSN: 1654-9880 Impact factor: 2.640
Baseline characteristics and PLF among mothers of children aged less than two years surveyed in South Sudan.
| Characteristics | All participants | Pre-lacteal feeding |
|---|---|---|
| N = 810 | N = 426 | |
| n (%) | n (%) | |
| Mother’s age | ||
| ≤19 | 59 (7.3) | 33 (7.7) |
| 20–24 | 205 (25.3) | 100 (23.5) |
| 25–29 | 289 (35.7) | 161 (37.8) |
| 30–34 | 178 (22.0) | 93 (21.8) |
| ≥35 | 79 (9.7) | 39 (9.2) |
| Marital status | ||
| Married | 793 (97.9) | 415 (97.4) |
| Single | 17 (2.1) | 11 (2.6) |
| Mother’s education | ||
| None | 516 (63.7) | 280 (65.7) |
| Primary | 228 (28.2) | 120 (28.2) |
| ≥Secondary | 66 (8.1) | 26 (6.1) |
| Mother’s employment | ||
| Employed | 120 (14.8) | 57 (13.4) |
| Unemployed | 690 (85.2) | 369 (86.6) |
| House ownership | ||
| Yes | 790 (97.5) | 417 (9.0) |
| No | 20 (2.5) | 251 (2.1) |
| Child’s sex | ||
| Male | 390 (48.2) | 230 (54.0) |
| Female | 420 (51.9) | 196 (46.0) |
Birth characteristics and PLF among mothers of children aged less than twoyears surveyed in South Sudan.
| Characteristics | All participants | Pre-lacteal feeding |
|---|---|---|
| N = 810 | N = 426 | |
| n (%) | n (%) | |
| Antenatal care visits | ||
| Four or more | 591 (73.0) | 299 (70.2) |
| 0–3 | 219 (27.0) | 127 (29.8) |
| Place of birth | ||
| Health facility | 209 (25.8) | 103 (24.2) |
| Home | 601 (74.2) | 323 (75.8) |
| Mode of child birth | ||
| Normal birth | 793 (97.9) | 414 (97.2) |
| Caesarean section | 17 (2.1) | 12 (2.8) |
| Type of birth | ||
| Single | 789 (97.4) | 416 (97.7) |
| Multiple | 21 (2.6) | 10 (2.4) |
| Birth order | ||
| Primipara | 138 (17.0) | 74 (17.4) |
| Multipara | 672 (83.0) | 352 (82.6) |
| Breastfeeding counselling | ||
| No | 508 (62.7) | 251 (58.9) |
| Yes | 302 (37.3) | 175 (41.1) |
| Breastfeeding support | ||
| No | 641 (79.1) | 344 (80.8) |
| Yes | 169 (20.9) | 82 (19.3) |
| Discarding of colostrum | ||
| No | 496 (61.2) | 239 (56.1) |
| Yes | 314 (38.8) | 187 (43.9) |
| Exposed to infant formula advertisement | ||
| No | 563 (69.5) | 350 (82.2) |
| Yes | 247 (30.5) | 76 (17.8) |
Figure 1.Types of pre-lacteal feeds used among mothers of children aged less than two years surveyed in South Sudan.
Bivariable and multivariable analysis of the use of PLF among mothers of children aged less than two years surveyed in South Sudan.
| Characteristic | Bivariable | Multivariable model 1 | Multivariable model 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| N = 810 | N = 810 | N = 810 | |
| OR (95%CI) | Adjusted odd ratio AOR (95%CI) | Adjusted odd ratio AOR (95%CI) | |
| Mother’s age | |||
| ≤19 | 1.5 (0.79, 2.82) | - | - |
| 20–24 | 1 | ||
| 25–29 | 1.2 (0.86, 1.76) | - | |
| 30–34 | 1.1 (0.66, 1.75) | - | - |
| ≥35 | 1.1 (0.60, 1.88) | - | - |
| Marital status | |||
| Married | 1 | ||
| Single | 1.67 (0.46,6.03) | - | - |
| Mother education | |||
| No formal education | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Primary | 0.94 (0.62,1.42) | 0.63 (0.33, 1.19) | 0.60 (0.31,1.09) |
| ≥Secondary | 0.55 (0.31,0.97) | 0.76 (0.24, 1.26) | 0.66 (0.21,2.04) |
| Mother employment | |||
| Employed | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Unemployed | 0.79 (0.49,1.26) | 0.84 (0.56, 1.26) | 0.85 (0.57,1.28) |
| House ownership | |||
| Yes | 1 | ||
| No | 0.73 (0.24,2.20) | - | - |
| Child sex | |||
| Male | 1 | ||
| Female | 1.20 (0.89,1.61) | - | - |
| Antenatal care visits | |||
| Four or more | 1 | ||
| 0–3 | 0.85 (0.65,1.13) | - | - |
| Place of birth | |||
| Health facility | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Home | 1.20 (0.81,1.77) | 1.23 (0.84,1.81) | 1.36 (0.92,2.01) |
| Mode of birth | |||
| Normal birth | 1 | ||
| Caesarean section | 2.20 (0.87,5.58) | - | - |
| Type of birth | |||
| Single | 1 | ||
| Multiple | 0.82 (0.27,2.48) | - | - |
| Birth order | |||
| Primipara | 1 | ||
| Multipara | 0.95 (0.70,1.29) | - | - |
| Breastfeeding counselling | |||
| No | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Yes | 0.71(0.50,1.08) | 0.60 (0.43,0.82) | 0.63 (0.46,0.87) |
| Breastfeeding support | |||
| Yes | 1 | ||
| No | 1.22 (0.81,1.86) | ||
| Discarding of colostrum | |||
| No | 1 | 1 | |
| Yes | 1.58 (1.11,2.26) | 1.57 (1.17, 2.11) | - |
| Exposure to infant formula advertisement | |||
| No | 1 | ||
| Yes | 1.05 (0.72,1.51) | - | - |
Multivariable model 1 including all the predefined variables.
Multivariable model 2 as in number 1 but excluding the discarding of colostrum.