| Literature DB >> 30294625 |
Julen Urra1, Itziar Alkorta2, Iker Mijangos1, Carlos Garbisu1.
Abstract
The application of sewage sludge to agricultural soil induces co-exposure of prokaryotic populations to antibiotics and heavy metals, thus exerting a selection pressure that may lead to the development of antibiotic resistance. Here, soil samples from a long-term factorial field experiment in which sewage sludge was applied to agricultural soil, at different rates (40 and 80 t ha-1) and frequencies (every 1, 2 and 4 years) of application, were studied to assess: (i) the effect of sewage sludge application on prokaryotic community composition, (ii) the links between prokaryotic community composition and antibiotic resistance profiles, and (iii) the links between antibiotic resistance and metal(oid) concentrations in amended soil. We found no significant impact of sewage sludge on prokaryotic community composition. Some antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) correlated positively with particular prokaryotic taxa, being Gemmatimonadetes the taxon with the greatest number of positive correlations at phylum level. No positive correlation was found between prokaryotic taxa and genes encoding resistance to sulfonamides and FCA. All metal(oid)s showed positive correlations with, at least, one ARG. Metal(oid) concentrations in soil also showed positive correlations with mobile genetic element genes, particularly with the gene tnpA-07. These data provide useful information on the links between soil prokaryotic composition and resistome profiles, and between antibiotic resistance and metal(oid) concentrations, in agricultural soils amended with sewage sludge.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30294625 PMCID: PMC6169428 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.09.025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1Hierarchical clustering of soil samples, based on Bray Curtis dissimilarities of prokaryotic OTUs obtained from 16S rRNA metabarcoding. Samples are arranged according to: (A) sewage sludge treatment; and (B) total amount of sewage sludge applied during the 24-year experiment. Treatments: 40-1: 40 t ha−1 every year; 40-2: 40 t ha−1 every 2 years; 40-4: 40 t ha−1 every 4 years; 80-1: 80 t ha−1 every year; 80-2: 80 t ha−1 every 2 years; 80-4: 40 t ha−1 every 4 years; C: control, unamended. Total amount of sewage sludge applied during the 24-year experiment (in t ha−1): 0, 240, 480, 960 and 1920.
Fig. 2Barplots representing the composition of: (A) the 20 most abundant prokaryotic taxa at phylum rank; and (B) the 30 most abundant taxa at family rank, for all sewage-amended and unamended soil samples. Control: unamended samples. Sewage: sewage sludge amended samples.
Fig. 3Effect of treatments on the composition of: (A) the 20 most abundant prokaryotic taxa at phylum rank; and (B) the 30 most abundant taxa at family rank. Treatments: 40-1: 40 t ha−1 every year; 40-2: 40 t ha−1 every 2 years; 40-4: 40 t ha−1 every 4 years; 80-1: 80 t ha−1 every year; 80-2: 80 t ha−1 every 2 years; 80-4: 40 t ha−1 every 4 years; C: control, unamended.
Fig. 4Effect of the total amount of sewage sludge applied during the 24-year experiment on the composition of: (A) the 20 most abundant prokaryotic taxa at phylum rank; and (B) the 30 most abundant taxa at family rank. Total amount of sewage sludge applied during the 24-year experiment (in t ha−1): 0, 240, 480, 960 and 1920.
Kendall׳s tau correlations between the 10 most abundant prokaryotic phyla. Negative correlation are displayed in italics.
| *** | ** | *** | *** | *** | * | ns | ns | ** | ||
| − | ns | ** | *** | *** | ns | ns | ns | *** | ||
| − | – | *** | ns | *** | *** | *** | ns | ns | ||
| 0.43 | − | − | ns | *** | *** | *** | ns | ns | ||
| − | 0.61 | – | – | *** | ns | ns | * | *** | ||
| − | 0.37 | 0.37 | − | 0.44 | ** | *** | * | ** | ||
| 0.22 | – | − | 0.50 | – | − | *** | ns | ns | ||
| – | – | 0.49 | – | 0.51 | − | ** | ns | |||
| – | – | – | – | − | − | – | − | ns | ||
| − | 0.55 | – | – | 0.63 | 0.29 | – | – | – |
ns: not significant; *: p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Kendall׳s tau significant correlations between the 10 most abundant prokaryotic phyla and the abundance of ARGs. Negative correlations are displayed in italics. Genes that were not amplified during the HT-qPCR analysis are highlighted in grey.
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. FCA: fluoroquinolone, quinolone, florfenicol, chloramphenicol and amphenicol resistance genes; MLSB: Macrolide-Lincosamide-Streptogramin B resistance.
Kendall׳s tau significant correlations between the 10 most abundant prokaryotic phyla and the abundance of MGE genes. Negative correlations are displayed in italics.
| 0.24* | |||||||||||
| 0.26* | |||||||||||
| 0.25* | 0.25* |
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Kendall׳s tau significant correlations between metal(oid) concentration in soil and abundance of ARGs. Negative correlations are displayed in italics. Genes that were not amplified during the HT-qPCR analysis are highlighted in grey.
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001. FCA: fluoroquinolone, quinolone, florfenicol, chloramphenicol and amphenicol resistance genes; MLSB: Macrolide-Lincosamide-Streptogramin B resistance.
Kendall׳s tau significant correlations between metal(oid) concentrations in soil and the abundance of MGE genes. Negative correlations are displayed in italics.
| 0.39* | ||||||||
| 0.36* | ||||||||
| 0.45** | 0.65*** | 0.39* | 0.34* | |||||
| 0.38* | ||||||||
* p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility | |
| Related research article |