| Literature DB >> 30294556 |
Nasima Khan1, Farhana Afroz2, Mst Nadira Begum3, Satyajit Roy Rony2, Suriya Sharmin2, Fatema Moni2, Choudhury Mahmood Hasan4, Koushik Shaha1, Md Hossain Sohrab2.
Abstract
This study reports the chemical investigation and bioactivity of the secondary metabolites produced by the endophytic fungus Fusarium solani isolated from Cassia alata Linn. growing in Bangladesh. This plant was collected from conservation forest in Bangladesh and belongs to the Caesalpiniaceae family. The endophytic fungus Fusarium solani was isolated from the tissue of root of this plant. The fungal strain was identified by morphological characters and DNA sequencing. The crude organic extract of the fungal strain was proven to be active when tested for cytotoxicity against Brine Shrimp Lethality Bioassay, antimicrobial and antioxidant activity. The bioactivity guided fractionation of the ethyl acetate extract leads to the isolation of seven secondary metabolites in pure form. The structures of the isolated compounds were determined by the analysis of NMR and mass spectroscopic data. Bioassay investigation of the isolated secondary metabolites suggested aza-anthraquinones are more potent bioactive compounds as anticancer and antimicrobial agent.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial activity; Cytotoxicity; Endophytic fungi; Fusarium solani
Year: 2018 PMID: 30294556 PMCID: PMC6169151 DOI: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2018.08.016
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxicol Rep ISSN: 2214-7500
Fig. 1Macroscopic (a) and Microscopic (b) view of Fusarium solani sp. The pictures represent macroscopic view of Fusarium solani from roots of Casia alata after 10 days of cultivation on PDA media and also represent microscopic view (40X).
Fig. 2Secondary metabolites produced from Fusarium solani isolated from C. alata - Ergosterol (1), Anhydrofusarubin (2), 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde (3), Bostrycoidin (4), Fusarubin (5), 3-deoxyfusarubin (6) and 3,5,9-trihydroxyergosta-7,22-6-one (7).
Antimicrobial Screening of Isolated Compounds.
| Sample | Diameter of Zone of Inhibition (mm) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacterial Strain | Fungal Strain | ||||||
| Gram positive | Gram negative | ||||||
| – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| 17 | 11 | 10 | 12 | – | – | ||
| – | – | – | 7 | – | – | ||
| 12 | 12 | 15 | 16 | – | – | ||
| 32 | 24 | 22 | 21 | – | – | ||
| 34 | 26 | 24 | 25 | ||||
| – | – | – | – | – | – | ||
| Positive control | KM | 48 | 30 | 30 | 35 | nd | nd |
| KC | nd | nd | nd | nd | 25 | 26 | |
Fig. 3Free radical scavenging activity of isolated compounds.
Fig. 4Cytotoxic effects of isolated compounds on vero cell line after 24 hour incubation. Results are compared with vehicle (DMSO). The results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 3). Degrees of significance determined using ANOVA with Post Hoc Tukey’s test for comparison of isolated pure compounds with vehicle are *** P < 0.001 and 0.01.