| Literature DB >> 30294505 |
Ahmed Fageer Osman1, Biju Thomas1, Nakul Singh1, Marc Collin1, Prem Singh Shekhawat1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of infant-polysomnography studies performed in the NICU on management and outcomes. STUDYEntities:
Keywords: Acute life threatening event; Home monitoring; Infant apnea; Polysomnography
Year: 2017 PMID: 30294505 PMCID: PMC6169804 DOI: 10.4172/2167-0897.1000257
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neonatal Biol ISSN: 2167-0897
Figure 1Distribution and use of polysomnography studies between 2010–2014 across various gestational age groups.
Demographic data and infant-polysomnography study characteristics of infants readmitted to the hospital with ALTE versus those who were not.
| Demographic data/ | Infant not readmitted | Re-admitted | P value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Birth Gestational Age (Weeks) | 30.2 ±2.8 | 30.5 ± 2.2 | 0.7 |
| Birth Weight (Grams, g) | 1420 ± 456 | 1471 ±442.3 | 0.72 |
| Age at study | 6.7 ± 3.9 | 6.5 ± 4.8 | 0.91 |
| Number of apneic episodes detected on polysomnography | 6 ± 4 | 4 ± 6 | 0.04 |
| Desaturation (% of time) | 1.0 ± 1.3 | 1.1 ± 1.1 | 0.83 |
| Longest Central Apnea (Seconds, s) | 16.1 ± 7.2 | 15.4 ± 3.4 | 0.58 |
Relationship between number and duration of apneic episodes and desaturation events and gestational age at birth, birth weight and age at study using regression analysis.
| Estimate | SEM | P value | R2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gestational age at birth | 181.00% | 85.00% | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Birth Weight (100 g) | 1.62 | 0.5 | 0.001 | 0.09 |
| Age at study (Weeks) | −1.44 | 0.58 | 0.02 | 0.05 |
| Gestational age at birth | 0.45 | 0.24 | 0.07 | 0.03 |
| Birth Weight (100 g) | 0.39 | 0.14 | 0.01 | 0.07 |
| Age at study (Weeks) | −0.36 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.04 |
| Gestational age at birth | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.83 | 0 |
| Birth Weight (100 g) | 0.09 | 0.1 | 0.39 | 0.01 |
| Age at study (Weeks) | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.96 | 0 |
Recommendations other than use of CR monitor made by pediatric pulmonologist based on polysomnography study findings.
| Recommendation | Number of the |
|---|---|
| Assessment for adequacy of oxygen saturation | 17 (15%) |
| Clinical Assessment/Evaluation | 9 (8%) |
| Assessment for GER/GERD | 8 (7%) |
| Assessment for GERD and dysphagia | 6 (5%) |
| Assessment for dysphagia | 5 (4.5%) |
| Assessment for adequacy of saturation+GERD+Dysphagia | 2 (2%) |
| Follow up sleep study | 2 (2%) |
| Assessment for adequacy of saturation+Dysphagia | 1 (1%) |
Use of cardiorespiratory monitor and medications.
| Intervention | No. of | Median duration of use |
|---|---|---|
| Discharged home on CR monitor | 105 (95%) | 9 (6–11) |
| Discharged home on caffeine | 27 (24.5%) | 5.5 (4–8.25) |
| Discharged home on metoclopramide | 31 (28%) | 15 (9.25–21.72) |
| Discharged home on antacid mediations | 26 (24) | 14 (10.5–23.5) |