| Literature DB >> 30294487 |
Young Mok Heo1, Kyeongwon Kim1, Sun Lul Kwon1, Joorim Na1, Hanbyul Lee1, Seokyoon Jang1, Chul Hwan Kim1, Jinho Jung1, Jae-Jin Kim1.
Abstract
The production of water-soluble pigments by fungal strains indigenous to South Korea was investigated to find those that are highly productive in submerged culture. Among 113 candidates, 34 strains that colored the inoculated potato dextrose agar medium were selected. They were cultured in potato dextrose broth and extracted with ethanol. The productivity, functionality (radical-scavenging activities), and color information (CIELAB values) of the pigment extracts were measured. Five species produced intense yellowish pigments, and two produced intense reddish pigments that ranked the highest in terms of absorbance units produced per day. The pigment extracts of Penicillium miczynskii, Sanghuangporus baumii, Trichoderma sp. 1, and Trichoderma afroharzianum exhibited high radical-scavenging activity. However, the S. baumii extract showed moderate toxicity in the acute toxicity test, which limits the industrial application of this pigment. In conclusion, P. miczynskii KUC1721, Trichoderma sp. 1 KUC1716, and T. afroharzianum KUC21213 were the best fungal candidates to be industrial producers of safe, functional water-soluble pigments.Entities:
Keywords: Acute toxicity; antioxidant; colorimetry; fungal pigment
Year: 2018 PMID: 30294487 PMCID: PMC6171424 DOI: 10.1080/12298093.2018.1513114
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mycobiology ISSN: 1229-8093 Impact factor: 1.858
The colors of pigments produced by fungal strains in potato dextrose agar.
| Fungal species | Strain ID | Observed color |
|---|---|---|
| Basidiomycete | ||
| KUC8611 | Yellow | |
| KUC10613 | Brown | |
| KUC10761 | Yellow | |
| KUC 9193 | Pink | |
| KUC10604 | Brown | |
| KUC10654 | Brown | |
| KUC10644 | Brown | |
| KUC10710 | Pink | |
| Ascomycete | ||
| KUC21245 | Red | |
| KUC21238 | Olive | |
| KUC21274 | Yellow | |
| KUC2769 | Dark Brown | |
| KUC21275 | Black | |
| KUC1519 | Yellow | |
| KUC21065 | Purple | |
| KUC3029 | Yellow | |
| KUC1684 | Yellow | |
| KUC1551 | Red | |
| KUC1721 | Red | |
| KUC3055 | Purple | |
| KUC1758 | Red | |
| KUC4096 | Red | |
| KUC21114 | Yellow | |
| KUC21213 | Red | |
| KUC21115 | Gray | |
| KUC21048 | Yellow | |
| KUC21210 | Yellow | |
| KUC21091 | Yellow | |
| KUC21268 | Yellow | |
| KUC1716 | Yellow | |
| Zygomycete | ||
| KUC30035 | Yellow | |
| KUC1803 | Yellow | |
| KUC6003 | Yellow | |
| KUC6014 | Yellow |
Figure 1.Comparison of pigment yield in submerged culture of selected fungi. (A) from those producing yellowish pigments, (B) from those producing reddish pigments. The error bars indicate the standard deviation. Values with the same letter do not differ significantly (α = 0.05) according to Tukey’s test.
Identifying information of the selected fungal strains producing water-soluble pigments in submerged culture.
| Fungal species | Strain ID | GenBank accession number | Incubation timemax. |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yellowish-pigment producers | |||
| KUC10644 | MH168100 | 14 | |
| KUC21213 | KX912217 | 7 | |
| KUC21274 | MH168099 | 14 | |
| KUC1716 | KR820004 | 7 | |
| KUC21091 | KX912188 | 7 | |
| Reddish-pigment producers | |||
| KUC4096 | MH168102 | 7 | |
| KUC1721 | MH168101 | 28 |
aInternal transcribed spacer (ITS) region.
bβ-tubulin (TUB) region.
cTranslation elongation factor-1α (EF1α) region.
dThe incubation time (day) that exhibited the highest yield.
The CIELAB parameters of the pigment extracts from the selected fungi.
| Fungal species | Strain ID | L* | a* | b* | C* | h |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KUC10644 | 85.8 | −3.3 | 72.1 | 72.2 | 92.6 | |
| KUC21213 | 84.2 | 0.2 | 39.4 | 39.4 | 89.7 | |
| KUC21274 | 94.9 | −1.7 | 8.3 | 8.4 | 101.6 | |
| KUC1716 | 86.5 | 0.3 | 44.1 | 44.1 | 89.6 | |
| KUC21091 | 84.3 | −2.1 | 53.8 | 53.9 | 92.2 | |
| KUC4096 | 88.2 | 1.8 | 24.3 | 24.4 | 85.7 | |
| KUC1721 | 73.3 | 12.6 | 41.1 | 42.9 | 73.0 |
The parameters were measured at D65 (Daylight 6500K).
Figure 2.ABTS (left) and DPPH (right) radical-scavenging activity of the pigment extracts. The error bars indicate the standard deviation. Values with the same letter in each group do not differ significantly (α = 0.05) according to Tukey’s test.
Figure 3.EC50 values of the selected pigment extracts against the neonates of Daphnia magna. The error bars indicate the 95% confidential intervals. Values with the same letter in each group do not differ significantly (α = 0.05) according to Tukey’s test.
The general toxicity rating corresponding to EC50 value.
| EC50 (mg/L) | Toxicity rating |
|---|---|
| >100 | Relatively non-toxic |
| 10–100 | Moderately toxic |
| 1–10 | Very toxic |
| <1 | Extremely toxic |