Literature DB >> 30294140

Echographic Comparison of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter between Both Eyes.

Maddalena De Bernardo1, Ilaria De Pascale1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30294140      PMCID: PMC6161571          DOI: 10.4103/ijccm.IJCCM_243_18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0972-5229


× No keyword cloud information.
Sir, We read with great interest the article by Yanamandra et al.[1] concerning the comparison of optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) between both eyes. We would like to congratulate the authors for their interesting paper. This is a very exciting topic because to prove that optic nerve diameters are similar in both eyes, supports the possibility not only to detect an increase in the intracranial pressure (ICP) but also to diagnose an optic neuritis or an optic nerve glioma that can show a similar picture, making the comparison between the two eyes mandatory. The authors correctly stated that there are some limitations to the study; however, in our opinion, there are some other limitations that need to be listed. If we understood correctly, the measurements of ONSD was done by a single investigator (primary author) who was not blinded to the diagnosis of high-altitude pulmonary edema (HAPE). A random sample of 10 optic nerve sheath ultrasonography (ONSU) out of every 100 ONSU conducted by the primary author was counter checked by the radiologist independently, who was blinded to the primary diagnosis and the earlier measurements but does not seem that they were blinded regarding the measurements in both eyes. As it was discussed in several reports, the real problem in the optic nerve measurements is the use of the B scan.[23456] This technique has some problem in measuring orbital structures due to the so-called blooming effect. Such effect, that can be less important when we deal with large lesions, can be misleading when we expect that a difference <0.5 mm can make a difference, as it happens in the measurements of the optic nerve. This effect will make very difficult to get objective acquisition and measurements of the pictures. For this reason, we would like to suggest the authors to utilize for future studies, the so-called standardized A scan that can be much more precise even if it requires some skill and is a little bit more difficult to perform.[7]

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  6 in total

1.  Coronal Axis Measurement of the Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter.

Authors:  Giorgio Iaconetta; Maddalena De Bernardo; Nicola Rosa
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 2.153

2.  Ultrasound assessment of optic nerve sheath diameter in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Nicola Rosa; Maddalena De Bernardo
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.425

3.  Comparison of Optic Nerve Sheath Diameter between both eyes: A Bedside Ultrasonography Approach.

Authors:  Uday Yanamandra; Amul Gupta; Srinivasa A Bhattachar; Sushma Yanamandra; Subrat K Das; Sagarika Patyal; Rajan Grewal; Velu Nair
Journal:  Indian J Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-03

4.  Measurement of the Optic Nerve in a Resource-Limited Setting.

Authors:  Nicola Rosa; Maddalena De Bernardo
Journal:  J Neurosci Rural Pract       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

5.  Comments on "Neuromuscular Ultrasonography of Cranial Nerves".

Authors:  Maurizio Tenuta; Maddalena De Bernardo; Nicola Rosa
Journal:  J Clin Neurol       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.077

6.  Clarification on Using Ultrasonography to Detect Intracranial Pressure.

Authors:  Maddalena De Bernardo; Nicola Rosa
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 7.389

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.