Alison Connolly1, Kate Jones2, Ioannis Basinas3, Karen S Galea3, Laura Kenny2, Padraic McGowan4, Marie A Coggins5. 1. Centre for Climate and Air Pollution Studies, School of Physics and The Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland, University Road, Galway, H91 CF50, Ireland. Electronic address: a.connolly22@nuigalway.ie. 2. Health and Safety Executive (HSE), Harpur Hill, Buxton, SK17 9JN, UK. 3. Centre for Human Exposure Science (CHES), Institute of Occupational Medicine (IOM), Edinburgh, EH14 4AP, UK. 4. Irish Commissioners for Public Works, Jonathon Swift Street, Trim, Co Meath, C15 NX36, Ireland. 5. Centre for Climate and Air Pollution Studies, School of Physics and The Ryan Institute, National University of Ireland, University Road, Galway, H91 CF50, Ireland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has recently classified glyphosate as a Group 2A 'probably carcinogenic to humans'. Due to this carcinogenic classification and resulting international debate, there is an increased demand for studies evaluating human health effects from glyphosate exposures. There is currently limited information on human exposures to glyphosate and a paucity of data regarding glyphosate's biological half-life in humans. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to estimate the human half-life of glyphosate from human urine samples collected from amenity horticulture workers using glyphosate based pesticide products. METHODS: Full void urine spot samples were collected over a period of approximately 24 h for eight work tasks involving seven workers. The elimination time and estimation of the half-life of glyphosate using three different measurement metrics: the unadjusted glyphosate concentrations, creatinine corrected concentrations and by using Urinary Excretion Rates (UER) (μg L-1, μmol/mol creatinine and UER μg L-1) was calculated by summary and linear interpolation using regression analysis. RESULTS: This study estimates the human biological half-life of glyphosate as approximately 5 ½, 10 and 7 ¼ hours for unadjusted samples, creatinine corrected concentrations and by using UER (μg L-1, μmol/mol creatinine, UER μg L-1), respectively. The approximated glyphosate half-life calculations seem to have less variability when using the UER compared to the other measuring metrics. CONCLUSION: This study provides new information on the elimination rate of glyphosate and an approximate biological half-life range for humans. This information can help optimise the design of sampling strategies, as well as assisting in the interpretation of results for human biomonitoring studies involving this active ingredient. The data could also contribute to the development or refinement of Physiologically Based PharmacoKinetic (PBPK) models for glyphosate.
BACKGROUND: The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has recently classified glyphosate as a Group 2A 'probably carcinogenic to humans'. Due to this carcinogenic classification and resulting international debate, there is an increased demand for studies evaluating human health effects from glyphosate exposures. There is currently limited information on human exposures to glyphosate and a paucity of data regarding glyphosate's biological half-life in humans. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to estimate the human half-life of glyphosate from human urine samples collected from amenity horticulture workers using glyphosate based pesticide products. METHODS: Full void urine spot samples were collected over a period of approximately 24 h for eight work tasks involving seven workers. The elimination time and estimation of the half-life of glyphosate using three different measurement metrics: the unadjusted glyphosate concentrations, creatinine corrected concentrations and by using Urinary Excretion Rates (UER) (μg L-1, μmol/mol creatinine and UER μg L-1) was calculated by summary and linear interpolation using regression analysis. RESULTS: This study estimates the human biological half-life of glyphosate as approximately 5 ½, 10 and 7 ¼ hours for unadjusted samples, creatinine corrected concentrations and by using UER (μg L-1, μmol/mol creatinine, UER μg L-1), respectively. The approximated glyphosate half-life calculations seem to have less variability when using the UER compared to the other measuring metrics. CONCLUSION: This study provides new information on the elimination rate of glyphosate and an approximate biological half-life range for humans. This information can help optimise the design of sampling strategies, as well as assisting in the interpretation of results for human biomonitoring studies involving this active ingredient. The data could also contribute to the development or refinement of Physiologically Based PharmacoKinetic (PBPK) models for glyphosate.
Authors: Jarrod L Eaton; Amber L Cathey; Jennifer A Fernandez; Deborah J Watkins; Monica K Silver; Ginger L Milne; Carmen Velez-Vega; Zaira Rosario; Jose Cordero; Akram Alshawabkeh; John D Meeker Journal: Ecotoxicol Environ Saf Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 6.291
Authors: Deepika Kubsad; Eric E Nilsson; Stephanie E King; Ingrid Sadler-Riggleman; Daniel Beck; Michael K Skinner Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Rachel M Lucia; Wei-Lin Huang; Khyatiben V Pathak; Marissa McGilvrey; Victoria David-Dirgo; Andrea Alvarez; Deborah Goodman; Irene Masunaka; Andrew O Odegaard; Argyrios Ziogas; Patrick Pirrotte; Trina M Norden-Krichmar; Hannah Lui Park Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2022-04-04 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Corina Lesseur; Khyatiben V Pathak; Patrick Pirrotte; Melissa N Martinez; Kelly K Ferguson; Emily S Barrett; Ruby H N Nguyen; Sheela Sathyanarayana; Daniele Mandrioli; Shanna H Swan; Jia Chen Journal: Environ Res Date: 2021-07-30 Impact factor: 6.498
Authors: Eduardo C Reynoso; Ricardo D Peña; Delfino Reyes; Yaselda Chavarin-Pineda; Ilaria Palchetti; Eduardo Torres Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-09-28 Impact factor: 3.390