Literature DB >> 30293908

External Beam Radiotherapy Increases the Risk of Bladder Cancer When Compared with Radical Prostatectomy in Patients Affected by Prostate Cancer: A Population-based Analysis.

Marco Moschini1, Emanuele Zaffuto2, Pierre I Karakiewicz3, David D Andrea4, Beat Foerster4, Mohammad Abufaraj5, Francesco Soria4, Agostino Mattei6, Francesco Montorsi7, Alberto Briganti7, Shahrokh F Shariat8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Long-term survival can be achieved in patients affected by localized prostate cancer (PCa) treated with either radical prostatectomy (RP) or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). However, development of a second primary tumor is still poorly investigated.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of RP and EBRT on subsequent risk of developing bladder (BCa) and/or rectal cancer (RCa) among PCa survivors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 84397 patients diagnosed with localized PCa, treated with RP or EBRT between 1988 and 2009, and older than 65 yr of age were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare insurance program-linked database. Our primary objective was to investigate the effect of EBRT and RP on the second primary BCa and RCa incidence. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Multivariable competing-risk regression analyses were performed to assess the risk of developing a second primary BCa or RCa. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of the 84397 individuals included in the study, 33252 (39%) were treated with RP and 51145 (61%) with EBRT. Median follow-up was 69 months, and follow-up periods for patients who did not develop BCa, RCa, or pelvic cancer were 68, 69, and 68 mo, respectively. A total of 1660 individuals developed pelvic tumors (1236 BCa and 432 RCa). The 5- and 10-yr cumulative BCa incidence rates were 0.75% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.64-0.85%) and 1.63% (95% CI: 1.45-1.80%) versus 1.26% (95% CI: 1.15-1.37%) and 2.34% (95% CI: 2.16-2.53%) for patients treated with RP versus EBRT, respectively. The 5- and 10-yr cumulative RCa incidence rates were 0.32% (95% CI: 0.25-0.39%) and 0.73% (95% CI: 0.61-0.85%) versus 0.36% (95% CI: 0.30-0.41%) and 0.69% (95% CI: 0.60-0.79%) for patients treated with RP versus EBRT, respectively. On multivariable competing risk regression analyses, treatment with EBRT was independently associated with the risk of developing a second primary BCa (hazard ratio: 1.35, CI: 1.18-1.55; p<0.001), but not RCa (p=0.4). Limitations include lack of information regarding the dose of radiotherapy and the retrospective nature with the implicit risk of selection bias.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with EBRT are at increased risk of developing a second primary BCa compared with those treated with RP. However, no differences were found considering RCa incidence in patients treated with RP or EBRT within the first 5 yr after primary therapy. These results need to be validated in a well-designed randomized prospective trial. PATIENT
SUMMARY: We retrospectively analyzed the risk of developing a second primary bladder or rectal cancer during follow-up for patients treated with radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy for a localized prostate cancer. We found that those treated with external beam radiotherapy are at an increased risk of developing a second primary bladder cancer tumor.
Copyright © 2018 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; External beam radiotherapy; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Rectal cancer; Second primary cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30293908     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.09.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of the residual prostate cancer rate on cystoprostatectomy specimen in patients treated with radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jeanne Schlegel; Charles Chahwan; Khelifa Ait Said; Lionel Vaudreuil; Sofiane Seddik; Xavier Tillou
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Second malignancy probabilities in patients with prostate cancer treated with whole pelvis radiation therapy versus prostate only radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hae Lin Cho; Vedang Murthy; Kent W Mouw; Anthony V D'Amico; Paul L Nguyen; Jonathan E Leeman; Edward Christopher Dee
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.012

3.  Genomic Features of Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer Arising After Prostate Radiotherapy.

Authors:  Matthew Mossanen; Filipe L F Carvalho; Vinayak Muralidhar; Mark A Preston; Brendan Reardon; Jake R Conway; Catherine Curran; Dory Freeman; Sybil Sha; Guru Sonpavde; Michelle Hirsch; Adam S Kibel; Eliezer M Van Allen; Kent W Mouw
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2021-12-23       Impact factor: 24.267

4.  The Risk of Second Primary Cancers in Prostate Cancer Survivors Treated in the Modern Radiotherapy Era.

Authors:  Marie-Christina Jahreiß; Katja K H Aben; Mischa S Hoogeman; Maarten L P Dirkx; Kim C de Vries; Luca Incrocci; Wilma D Heemsbergen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-11-13       Impact factor: 6.244

5.  Survival outcomes in esophageal cancer patients with a prior cancer.

Authors:  Deqiang Pan; Wenbo Xu; Xingcai Gao; Feng Yiyang; Shuai Wei; Guang Zhu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Association of Radiotherapy for Rectal Cancer and Second Gynecological Malignant Neoplasms.

Authors:  Xu Guan; Ran Wei; Runkun Yang; Zhao Lu; Enrui Liu; Zhixun Zhao; Haipeng Chen; Ming Yang; Zheng Liu; Zheng Jiang; Xishan Wang
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-01-04

7.  Risk and prognosis of secondary bladder cancer after radiation therapy for pelvic cancer.

Authors:  Shuofeng Li; Ran Wei; Guanhua Yu; Hengchang Liu; Tianli Chen; Xu Guan; Xishan Wang; Zheng Jiang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 5.738

8.  Racial differences in the risk of second primary bladder cancer following radiation therapy among localized prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Lu Zhang; Mei-Chin Hsieh; Claire Allison; Michael Devane; Chindo Hicks; Qingzhao Yu; Lu Shi; Jiande Wu; Xiao-Cheng Wu
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.890

Review 9.  Cancer Cell Direct Bioprinting: A Focused Review.

Authors:  David Angelats Lobo; Paola Ginestra; Elisabetta Ceretti; Teresa Puig Miquel; Joaquim Ciurana
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.891

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.