Literature DB >> 3029386

Application of molecular dynamics with interproton distance restraints to three-dimensional protein structure determination. A model study of crambin.

G M Clore, A T Brünger, M Karplus, A M Gronenborn.   

Abstract

The applicability of restrained molecular dynamics for the determination of three-dimensional protein structures on the basis of short interproton distances (less than 4 A) that can be realistically determined from nuclear magnetic resonance measurements in solution is assessed. The model system used is the 1.2 A resolution crystal structure of the 46 residue protein crambin, from which a set of 240 approximate distance restraints, divided into three ranges (2.5 +/- 0.5, 3.0+0.5(-1.0) and 4 +/- 1 A), is derived. This interproton distance set comprises 159 short-range ([i-j] less than or equal to 5) and 56 ([i-j] greater than 5) long-range inter-residue distances and 25 intra-residue distances. Restrained molecular dynamics are carried out using a number of different protocols starting from two initial structures: a completely extended beta-strand; and an extended structure with two alpha-helices in the same positions as in the crystal structure (residues 7 to 19, and 23 to 30) and all other residues in the form of extended beta-strands. The root-mean-square (r.m.s.) atomic differences between these two initial structures and the crystal structure are 43 A and 23 A, respectively. It is shown that, provided protocols are used that permit the secondary structure elements to form at least partially prior to folding into a tertiary structure, convergence to the correct final structure, both globally and locally, is achieved. The r.m.s. atomic differences between the converged restrained dynamics structures and the crystal structure range from 1.5 to 2.2 A for the backbone atoms and from 2.0 to 2.8 A for all atoms. The r.m.s. atomic difference between the X-ray structure and the structure obtained by first averaging the co-ordinates of the converged restrained dynamics structures is even smaller: 1.0 A for the backbone atoms and 1.6 A for all atoms. These results provide a measure with which to judge future experimental results on proteins whose crystal structures are unknown. In addition, from an examination of the dynamics trajectories, it is shown that the convergence pathways followed by the various simulations are different.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3029386     DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(86)90146-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  28 in total

1.  Reweighted atomic densities to represent ensembles of NMR structures.

Authors:  Charles D Schwieters; G Marius Clore
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.835

2.  1H and 15N NMR assignment and solution structure of the SH3 domain of spectrin: comparison of unrefined and refined structure sets with the crystal structure.

Authors:  F J Blanco; A R Ortiz; L Serrano
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.835

3.  Structure of the 1,4-bis(2'-deoxyadenosin-N6-yl)-2R,3R-butanediol cross-link arising from alkylation of the human N-ras codon 61 by butadiene diepoxide.

Authors:  W Keither Merritt; Lubomir V Nechev; Tandace A Scholdberg; Stephen M Dean; Sarah E Kiehna; Johanna C Chang; Thomas M Harris; Constance M Harris; R Stephen Lloyd; Michael P Stone
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2005-08-02       Impact factor: 3.162

4.  Structure of the 1,4-Bis(2'-deoxyadenosin-N(6)-yl)-2S,3S-butanediol intrastrand DNA cross-link arising from butadiene diepoxide in the human N-ras codon 61 sequence.

Authors:  Wen Xu; W Keither Merritt; Lubomir V Nechev; Thomas M Harris; Constance M Harris; R Stephen Lloyd; Michael P Stone
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2007-01-27       Impact factor: 3.739

5.  Comparative protein structure modeling using Modeller.

Authors:  Ben Webb; Andrej Sali; Narayanan Eswar; Marc A Marti-Renom; M S Madhusudhan; David Eramian; Min-Yi Shen; Ursula Pieper
Journal:  Curr Protoc Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-10

6.  Solution structure of barley lipid transfer protein complexed with palmitate. Two different binding modes of palmitate in the homologous maize and barley nonspecific lipid transfer proteins.

Authors:  M H Lerche; F M Poulsen
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Validation of the use of intermolecular NOE constraints for obtaining docked structures of protein-ligand complexes.

Authors:  M J Gradwell; J Feeney
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.835

8.  Three-dimensional structures of three engineered cellulose-binding domains of cellobiohydrolase I from Trichoderma reesei.

Authors:  M L Mattinen; M Kontteli; J Kerovuo; M Linder; A Annila; G Lindeberg; T Reinikainen; T Drakenberg
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  The cis-(5R,6S)-thymine glycol lesion occupies the wobble position when mismatched with deoxyguanosine in DNA.

Authors:  Kyle L Brown; Ashis K Basu; Michael P Stone
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  The NMR restraints grid at BMRB for 5,266 protein and nucleic acid PDB entries.

Authors:  Jurgen F Doreleijers; Wim F Vranken; Christopher Schulte; Jundong Lin; Jonathan R Wedell; Christopher J Penkett; Geerten W Vuister; Gert Vriend; John L Markley; Eldon L Ulrich
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.835

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.