Literature DB >> 30293648

Use of processing fluids and serum samples to characterize porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus dynamics in 3 day-old pigs.

Carles Vilalta1, Juan Sanhueza2, Julio Alvarez3, Deb Murray4, Montserrat Torremorell2, Cesar Corzo2, Robert Morrison2.   

Abstract

Collection of serum samples of pigs at weaning to monitor for porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) has become a common practice to determine PRRSV herd infection status. Diagnostic sensitivity of this practice is low in herds undergoing PRRSV elimination once prevalence of infection is near zero. Thus, the goal of this study was to characterize the dynamics of PRRSV infection in 3 day-old pigs overtime using serum and serosanguineous fluids obtained as part of castration and tail docking practices (processing fluids (PF)). Secondary goal was to estimate sensitivity and specificity of PF in the 3 day old population. A 6000 breed-to-wean sow herd was monitored every three weeks for 23 weeks after a PRRSV outbreak by collecting both PF and individual serum samples from all pigs in the selected litters. Out of the 77 litters tested, 23 (29.8%) were identified as positive using the PF and the serum samples, with a Cohen's kappa statistic of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.59-1) between the results obtained in each sample type. The sensitivity and specificity of the PF relative to the results in serum was 87% (95% CI: 66%-97%) and 94% (95% CI: 85%-99%) respectively. The percentage of PRRSV positive litters decreased over time and litters from gilts were more likely to test positive than those from older sows. Overall, the study demonstrates that PF can be a convenient and reliable specimen to monitor PRRSV infection in breeding herds.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Monitoring; PRRSV; Processing fluids

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30293648     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2018.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Microbiol        ISSN: 0378-1135            Impact factor:   3.293


  6 in total

Review 1.  Noninvasive strategies for surveillance of swine viral diseases: a review.

Authors:  Hanna Turlewicz-Podbielska; Jan Włodarek; Małgorzata Pomorska-Mól
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.279

2.  Considerations in the use of processing fluids for the detection of PRRSV RNA and antibody.

Authors:  Will López; Jeff Zimmerman; Phil Gauger; Karen Harmon; Ronaldo Magtoto; Laura Bradner; Derald Holtkamp; Min Zhang; Jianqiang Zhang; Alejandro Ramirez; Daniel Linhares; Luis Giménez-Lirola
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 1.569

3.  Effect of litter aggregation and pooling on detection of porcine reproductive and respiratory virus in piglet processing fluids.

Authors:  Carles Vilalta; Jake Baker; Juan Sanhueza; Deb Murray; Amanda Sponheim; Julio Alvarez; Fred Sylvia; Dale Polson; Montse Torremorell; Cesar Corzo; Robert B Morrison
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 1.279

4.  Longitudinal piglet sampling in commercial sow farms highlights the challenge of PRRSV detection.

Authors:  Marcelo Nunes de Almeida; Cesar A Corzo; Jeffrey J Zimmerman; Daniel Correia Lima Linhares
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2021-04-12

5.  PRRSV detection by qPCR in processing fluids and serum samples collected in a positive stable breeding herd following mass vaccination of sows with a modified live vaccine.

Authors:  A Lebret; P Berton; V Normand; I Messager; N Robert; F Bouchet; M Brissonnier; G Boulbria
Journal:  Porcine Health Manag       Date:  2021-01-04

6.  PRRSV2 genetic diversity defined by RFLP patterns in the United States from 2007 to 2019.

Authors:  Giovani Trevisan; Aditi Sharma; Phillip Gauger; Karen M Harmon; Jianqiang Zhang; Rodger Main; Michael Zeller; Leticia C M Linhares; Daniel C L Linhares
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 1.569

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.