| Literature DB >> 30293577 |
Jessica H Beeson1, Heather L Blackmore2, Sarah K Carr3, Laura Dearden4, Daniella E Duque-Guimarães5, Laura C Kusinski6, Lucas C Pantaleão7, Adele G Pinnock8, Catherine E Aiken9, Dino A Giussani10, Denise S Fernandez-Twinn11, Susan E Ozanne12.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Obesity during pregnancy is associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease in the offspring. With increased numbers of women entering pregnancy overweight or obese, there is a requirement for targeted interventions to reduce disease risk in future generations. Using an established murine model of maternal obesity during pregnancy, we investigated if a treadmill exercise intervention in the mother could improve offspring cardiac health and explored potential underlying mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: Echocardiography; Exercise; Hypertrophy; Obesity; Pregnancy
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30293577 PMCID: PMC6157615 DOI: 10.1016/j.molmet.2018.06.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Metab ISSN: 2212-8778 Impact factor: 7.422
Figure 1Maternal body composition. A) Body weight. TD-NMR was used to assess B) Fat mass and C) Lean mass of dams. Week 0 = day females were set up for timed mating. Data points are separated by 1 week. Control n = 12, Obese n = 12 and Ob-Ex n = 11. **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001).
Offspring body composition and heart weight.
| Control | N | Obese | N | Ob-Ex | N | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fed BW (g) | 25.5 ± 0.3 | 6 | 25.6 ± 0.3 | 6 | 25.6 ± 0.5 | 5 | 0.98 |
| Fat mass (g) | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 6 | 3.1 ± 0.3 | 6 | 2.6 ± 0.3 | 5 | 0.06 |
| Lean mass (g) | 18.5 ± 0.3 | 6 | 18.1 ± 0.3 | 6 | 18.1 ± 0.3 | 5 | 0.56 |
| Fasted BW (g) | 22.8 ± 0.4 | 11 | 22.4 ± 0.7 | 9 | 23.2 ± 0.3 | 9 | 0.55 |
| Heart weight (mg) | 130.6 ± 3.8 | 11 | 156.8 ± 5.7ac | 9 | 135.9 ± 2.0 | 9 | < |
| Relative heart weight (%BW) | 0.57 ± 0.01 | 11 | 0.66 ± 0.02ac | 9 | 0.59 ± 0.01 | 9 | < |
Body composition was performed by TD-NMR under fed conditions. 16 h fasted body weight (BW) was measured to allow normalization of fasted heart weight. P values were calculated by one-way ANOVA and shown in bold when a significant difference was detected (p < 0.05). Letters represent differences between specified groups by Bonferroni post-hoc test (p < 0.05) a Control vs. Obese and c Obese vs. Ob-Ex.
Serological analysis in 8 week offspring.
| Analytes (mmol/L) | Control | N | Obese | N | Ob-Ex | N | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Triglycerides | 1.19 ± 0.07 | 9 | 1.25 ± 0.09 | 6 | 1.48 ± 0.14 | 9 | 0.14 |
| Free Fatty Acids | 926.9 ± 49.0 | 9 | 935.0 ± 105.7 | 6 | 799.6 ± 87.8 | 9 | 0.79 |
| Total Cholesterol | 3.53 ± 0.08 | 8 | 3.38 ± 0.06 | 5 | 3.18 ± 0.09b | 9 | |
| Plasma Glucose | 5.4 ± 0.3 | 9 | 6.1 ± 0.2 | 6 | 6.4 ± 0.4 | 9 | 0.20 |
Analytes were analyzed in overnight fasted (16 h) serum from male offspring at 8 weeks of age. P values were calculated by one-way ANOVA and shown in bold when a significant difference was detected (p < 0.05). Letters represent differences between specified groups by Bonferroni post-hoc test (p < 0.05) b Control vs. Ob-Ex.
Figure 2Pathologic LV cardiac hypertrophy in male offspring at 8 weeks of age. A) Representative images of wheat germ agglutinin stained mid-cardiac sections. B) Mean cardiomyocyte cell area. C) Frequency distribution of cardiomyocyte cell area. N = 6 hearts per group with ∼7000 cells analyzed per group. D) Ventricular fetal gene expression. Housekeeper glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh) was unchanged between groups. Control n = 9, Obese n = 7 and Ob-Ex n = 9. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001. Nppa- atrial natriuretic peptide; Nppb- brain natriuretic peptide; Myh7- β-MHC; Myh6- α-MHC.
Figure 3Offspring blood pressure and aortic diameter. A) Systolic blood pressure B) Pulse rate (bpm) as measured by tail cuff plethysmography. Control n = 16, Obese n = 14 and Ob-Ex n = 10. C) Ascending aortic (Asc Ao) diameter measured using EKV™ images using echocardiography. Control n = 13, Obese n = 10 and Ob-Ex n = 6. D) Difference in aortic diameter between end-systole and end-diastole. Control n = 10, Obese n = 9 and Ob-Ex n = 4. **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.
Figure 4Offspring cardiac function by . A)-D) LV systolic function and contractility measured by echocardiography. Control n = 16, Obese n = 16 and Ob-Ex n = 7. E) Assessment of proteins important in contractile machinery, blots shown in Supplementary Fig. 2. Control n = 9, Obese n = 8 and Ob-Ex n = 8. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. TnI- total Troponin I, p-TnI- p-Troponin I and Tpm- Tropomyosin.
In vivo echocardiographic parameters.
| Control | Obese | Ob-Ex | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| End diastolic volume (μl) | 58.9 ± 3.9 | 68.4 ± 3.0 | 59.2 ± 3.0 | 0.097 |
| End diastolic diameter (mm) | 3.70 ± 0.10 | 3.95 ± 0.08 | 3.72 ± 0.08 | 0.092 |
| Stroke volume (μl) | 41.39 ± 1.9 | 38.85 ± 1.3 | 43.26 ± 1.4 | 0.250 |
| Heart Rate (bpm) | 443 ± 12 | 421 ± 11 | 446 ± 17 | 0.291 |
| Cardiac output (ml/min) | 18.2 ± 0.8 | 16.31 ± 0.6 | 19.37 ± 1.18 | |
| IVS; diastole (mm) | 0.924 ± 0.04 | 0.869 ± 0.05 | 0.957 ± 0.05 | 0.440 |
| LVID; diastole (mm) | 3.65 ± 0.10 | 3.92 ± 0.07 | 3.71 ± 0.07 | 0.061 |
| LVPW; diastole (mm) | 0.85 ± 0.04 | 0.82 ± 0.03 | 0.89 ± 0.07 | 0.620 |
| Wall: Lumen ratio; diastole | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.02 | 0.279 |
| IVS; systole (mm) | 1.37 ± 0.05 | 1.25 ± 0.05 | 1.51 ± 0.09c | |
| LVID; systole (mm) | 2.32 ± 0.12 | 2.82 ± 0.10ac | 2.24 ± 0.14 | |
| LVPW; systole (mm) | 1.34 ± 0.05 | 1.18 ± 0.05 | 1.42 ± 0.11c | |
| Wall: Lumen ratio; systole | 0.57 ± 0.04 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 0.65 ± 0.08c | |
| LV mass (mg) | 90.2 ± 3.6 | 98.0 ± 3.9 | 97.6 ± 10.0 | 0.453 |
LV = Left ventricle, IVS= Interventricular septum, LVID = LV internal diameter and LVPW = LV posterior wall. Control n = 16, Obese n = 16 and Ob-Ex n = 7. P values were calculated by one-way ANOVA and shown in bold when a significant difference was detected (p < 0.05). Letters represent differences between specified groups by Bonferroni post hoc test (p < 0.05) a Control vs. Obese, b Control vs. Ob-Ex and c Obese vs. Ob-Ex.