Literature DB >> 30293185

Retentive force of PEEK secondary crowns on zirconia primary crowns over time.

Oliver Schubert1, Josef Reitmaier2, Josef Schweiger3, Kurt Erdelt3, Jan-Frederik Güth3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the retentive forces of CAD/CAM-fabricated polyetheretherketone (PEEK) secondary crowns on zirconia primary crowns over an artificial aging period representing 10 years of clinical service and compare them to electroformed secondary crowns made from pure gold.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Implant-supported zirconia primary crowns (N = 20) were CAD/CAM milled and provided either with electroformed secondary crowns (group ZE; N = 10) or CAD/CAM-fabricated PEEK secondary crowns (group ZP; N = 10). All secondary crowns were attached to a casted tertiary structure to ensure adequate stability. A universal testing machine was used to determine the retentive force values at baseline and after 1, 3, 5, and 10 years of simulated aging in the presence of artificial saliva. Data were analyzed applying Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Kruskal-Wallis, and Mann-Whitney U test. Level of significance was set at p < 0.05.
RESULTS: Retentive forces were not different for the groups ZE and ZP at baseline (median ZE 2.85 N; ZP 2.8 N; p ≤ 0.218). Because retentive force values changed significantly over simulation time for group ZE (Kruskal-Wallis; p ≤ 0.028), the values between the test groups ZE and ZP differed significantly (Mann-Whitney U) at 5 years (ZE 3.03 N; ZP 2.76 N; p ≤ 0.003) and 10 years (ZE 3.1 N; ZP 2.78 N; p ≤ 0.011).
CONCLUSIONS: PEEK secondary crowns exhibit stable retentive force values over 10 years of simulated aging showing no signs of deterioration while the retentive force values of electroformed secondary crowns increase over time. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: PEEK might be a suitable alternative to proven metallic materials for the fabrication of secondary crowns.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD/CAM; Double crowns; Electroforming; Implant prosthetics; Polyetheretherketone (PEEK); Retentive force; Zirconia

Year:  2018        PMID: 30293185     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-018-2657-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  4 in total

Review 1.  Review on Development and Dental Applications of Polyetheretherketone-Based Biomaterials and Restorations.

Authors:  Ludan Qin; Shuo Yao; Jiaxin Zhao; Chuanjian Zhou; Thomas W Oates; Michael D Weir; Junling Wu; Hockin H K Xu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.623

Review 2.  The use of PEEK in digital prosthodontics: A narrative review.

Authors:  Ioannis Papathanasiou; Phophi Kamposiora; George Papavasiliou; Marco Ferrari
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2020-08-02       Impact factor: 2.757

3.  Clinical evaluation of performance of single unit polyetheretherketone crown restoration-a pilot study.

Authors:  Kavishma Sulaya; Satyabodh S Guttal
Journal:  J Indian Prosthodont Soc       Date:  2020-01-27

4.  Digitally Fabricated Dentures for Full Mouth Rehabilitation with Zirconia, Polyetheretherketone and Selective Laser Melted Ti-6Al-4V Material.

Authors:  Wei-Ting Lee; Yung-Chung Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.390

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.