Literature DB >> 30292998

Testing the performance of one and two box models as tools for risk assessment of particle exposure during packing of inorganic fertilizer.

Carla Ribalta1, Antti J Koivisto2, Ana López-Lilao3, Sara Estupiñá3, María C Minguillón4, Eliseo Monfort3, Mar Viana4.   

Abstract

Modelling of particle exposure is a useful tool for preliminary exposure assessment in workplaces with low and high exposure concentrations. However, actual exposure measurements are needed to assess models reliability. Worker exposure was monitored during packing of an inorganic granulate fertilizer at industrial scale using small and big bags. Particle concentrations were modelled with one and two box models, where the emission source was estimated with the fertilizer's dustiness index. The exposure levels were used to calculate inhaled dose rates and test accuracy of the exposure modellings. The particle number concentrations were measured from worker area by using a mobility and optical particle sizer which were used to calculate surface area and mass concentrations. The concentrations in the worker area during pre-activity ranged 63,797-81,073 cm-3, 4.6 × 106 to 7.5 × 106 μm2 cm-3, and 354 to 634 μg m-3 (respirable mass fraction) and during packing 50,300 to 85,949 cm-3, 4.3 × 106 to 7.6 × 106 μm2 cm-3, and 279 to 668 μg m-3 (respirable mass fraction). Thus, the packing process did not significantly increase the exposure levels. Chemical exposure was also under control based on REACH standards. The particle surface area deposition rate in respiratory tract was up to 7.6 × 106 μm2 min-1 during packing, with 52%-61% of deposition occurring in the alveolar region. Ratios of the modelled and measured concentrations were 0.98 ± 0.19 and 0.84 ± 0.12 for small and big bags, respectively, when using the one box model, and 0.88 ± 0.25 and 0.82 ± 0.12, when using the two box model. The modelling precision improved for both models when outdoor particle concentrations were included. This study shows that exposure concentrations in a low emission industrial scenario, e.g. during packing of a fertilizer, can be predicted with a reasonable accuracy by using the concept of dustiness and mass balance models.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Exposure prediction; Indoor aerosol modelling; Industrial packing; Occupational exposure; Risk management

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30292998     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  4 in total

1.  Modeling of High Nanoparticle Exposure in an Indoor Industrial Scenario with a One-Box Model.

Authors:  Carla Ribalta; Antti J Koivisto; Apostolos Salmatonidis; Ana López-Lilao; Eliseo Monfort; Mar Viana
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-05-14       Impact factor: 3.390

2.  Exposure Models for REACH and Occupational Safety and Health Regulations.

Authors:  John William Cherrie; Wouter Fransman; Gerardus Antonius Henrikus Heussen; Dorothea Koppisch; Keld Alstrup Jensen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  How to Obtain a Reliable Estimate of Occupational Exposure? Review and Discussion of Models' Reliability.

Authors:  Andrea Spinazzè; Francesca Borghi; Davide Campagnolo; Sabrina Rovelli; Marta Keller; Giacomo Fanti; Andrea Cattaneo; Domenico Maria Cavallo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Characterizing the Chemical Profile of Incidental Ultrafine Particles for Toxicity Assessment Using an Aerosol Concentrator.

Authors:  M Viana; A Salmatonidis; S Bezantakos; C Ribalta; N Moreno; P Córdoba; F R Cassee; J Boere; S Fraga; J P Teixeira; M J Bessa; E Monfort
Journal:  Ann Work Expo Health       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 2.179

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.