Literature DB >> 30292530

Novel method of fitting of children with auditory brainstem implants.

M Polak1, L Colletti2, V Colletti3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To develop a reliable and objective fitting method for use with young children with an auditory brainstem implant (ABI).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were 17 young children implanted with an ABI with the mean age 2 years and 4 months (8-64 months). Evoked auditory brainstem response (eABR) measurements were performed intraoperatively and at activation in order to record the auditory response and non-auditory side effects. Each child was tested to observe any subjective responses to the electric stimuli and non-auditory side effects. All children were fitted based on the postoperative eABR. The minimum follow up time was 12 months.
RESULTS: Intraoperatively an eABR could be obtained in all children. The responses were recordable from 75-100% of all electrodes. At initial stimulation eABR were recordable in all children. The eABR was obtained in 79.7% of all electrodes (25-100%) with a mean eABR threshold of 22.3 nC. eABR without any non-auditory stimulation was recorded on all electrodes in 11 children. Mixed eABR and non-auditory responses were recorded on 2-6 electrodes in 6 children. The subjective auditory responses for at least 1 electrode were noted in 15 children. In the 2 remaining cases the auditory response was obtained only when the device was activated. In all children the subjective responses were within the estimated dynamic range for each electrode. Each child was able to accept up to 100% of volume of the created map. The non-auditory response was observed only on children and electrodes with mixed eABR and non-auditory responses. The mean CAP score at 6 months after the activation was 2.4 (1-4).
CONCLUSIONS: eABR seems to be a reliable tool to judge ABI electrode placement and a reliable method for fitting of young children with an ABI. The data suggest that eABR-based fitting helps children to more quickly achieve auditory perception and development.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory brainstem implant; Fitting; Implantation; eABR; eSRT

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30292530     DOI: 10.1016/j.anorl.2017.10.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis        ISSN: 1879-7296            Impact factor:   2.080


  2 in total

1.  Auditory Brainstem Implants-Hearing Restoration in Congenitally Deaf Children.

Authors:  Robert Behr; Konrad Schwager; Erich Hofmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 8.251

2.  Measurements of the local evoked potential from the cochlear nucleus in patients with an auditory brainstem implant and its implication to auditory perception and audio processor programming.

Authors:  Lutz Gärtner; Thomas Lenarz; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.