| Literature DB >> 30292276 |
Tianye Lin1, Yuelei Lyu1, Jianxun Qu2, Xin Cheng3, Xiaoyuan Fan1, Yiwei Zhang1, Bo Hou1, Hui You1, Wenbin Ma4, Feng Feng5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) in post-treatment glioma patients, and to compare the performance of arterial spin labelling (ASL) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) in detecting CCD. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This retrospective study included 130 patients who had both DSC and ASL. Among them, 16 had underwent fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT). We investigated the relationship between CCD and the location and size of supratentorial lesions, and compared PET diagnostic performance with that of ASL and DSC. We assessed the inter-methods agreement for ASL and DSC, and performed quantitative analysis by calculating the asymmetry index (AI) between bilateral cerebellum and exploring how the AI values for ASL-CBF, DSC-rCBF, and DSC-rCBV maps correlated with each other. RESULT: Supratentorial lesions affecting the corona radiata (P < 0.001), basal ganglia (P < 0.001), and insula (P = 0.046) were significantly associated with the occurrence of CCD. Lesion size was significantly larger (P = 0.005) in the CCD positive group. With PET as a reference, ASL-CBF and DSC-rCBF maps exhibited the best diagnostic performance compared with the other DSC-generated maps (diagnostic accuracy = 83.3% for both, area under curve (AUC) of ASL = 0.967, AUC of rCBF = 0.983), although differences were not statistically significant. The κ value for the inter-methods (ASL and DSC) agreement in detecting CCD was 0.893, while the degree of perfusion asymmetry was more significant in ASL- than DSC-generated maps. Bland-Altman plots showed that the AI for ASL-CBF was moderately correlated with those for DSC-rCBF and DSC-rCBV.Entities:
Keywords: Arterial spin labelling; Crossed cerebellar diaschisis; Dynamic susceptibility contrast; Glioma; Positron emission tomography
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30292276 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.08.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Radiol ISSN: 0720-048X Impact factor: 3.528