Literature DB >> 30292124

Towards globally customizable ecosystem service models.

Javier Martínez-López1, Kenneth J Bagstad2, Stefano Balbi3, Ainhoa Magrach3, Brian Voigt4, Ioannis Athanasiadis5, Marta Pascual3, Simon Willcock6, Ferdinando Villa7.   

Abstract

Scientists, stakeholders and decision makers face trade-offs between adopting simple or complex approaches when modeling ecosystem services (ES). Complex approaches may be time- and data-intensive, making them more challenging to implement and difficult to scale, but can produce more accurate and locally specific results. In contrast, simple approaches allow for faster assessments but may sacrifice accuracy and credibility. The ARtificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services (ARIES) modeling platform has endeavored to provide a spectrum of simple to complex ES models that are readily accessible to a broad range of users. In this paper, we describe a series of five "Tier 1" ES models that users can run anywhere in the world with no user input, while offering the option to easily customize models with context-specific data and parameters. This approach enables rapid ES quantification, as models are automatically adapted to the application context. We provide examples of customized ES assessments at three locations on different continents and demonstrate the use of ARIES' spatial multi-criteria analysis module, which enables spatial prioritization of ES for different beneficiary groups. The models described here use publicly available global- and continental-scale data as defaults. Advanced users can modify data input requirements, model parameters or entire model structures to capitalize on high-resolution data and context-specific model formulations. Data and methods contributed by the research community become part of a growing knowledge base, enabling faster and better ES assessment for users worldwide. By engaging with the ES modeling community to further develop and customize these models based on user needs, spatiotemporal contexts, and scale(s) of analysis, we aim to cover the full arc from simple to complex assessments, minimizing the additional cost to the user when increased complexity and accuracy are needed.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ARIES; Cloud-based modeling; Context-aware modeling; Decision making; Semantic modeling; Spatial multi-criteria analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30292124     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.371

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  3 in total

1.  An ecosystem service perspective on urban nature, physical activity, and health.

Authors:  Roy P Remme; Howard Frumkin; Anne D Guerry; Abby C King; Lisa Mandle; Chethan Sarabu; Gregory N Bratman; Billie Giles-Corti; Perrine Hamel; Baolong Han; Jennifer L Hicks; Peter James; Joshua J Lawler; Therese Lindahl; Hongxiao Liu; Yi Lu; Bram Oosterbroek; Bibek Paudel; James F Sallis; Jasper Schipperijn; Rok Sosič; Sjerp de Vries; Benedict W Wheeler; Spencer A Wood; Tong Wu; Gretchen C Daily
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Multiscale Characteristics and Drivers of the Bundles of Ecosystem Service Budgets in the Su-Xi-Chang Region, China.

Authors:  Yue Wang; Qi Fu; Tinghui Wang; Mengfan Gao; Jinhua Chen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-10-09       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 3.  Considering Ecosystem Services in Food System Resilience.

Authors:  Yevheniia Varyvoda; Douglas Taren
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.