Literature DB >> 30291768

Learning curve and surgical factors influencing the surgical outcomes during the initial experience with laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Yuichi Nagakawa1, Yoshiharu Nakamura2, Goro Honda3, Yoshitaka Gotoh4, Takao Ohtsuka4, Daisuke Ban5, Kohei Nakata4, Yatsuka Sahara1, Vittoria Vanessa D M Velasquez4, Kyoichi Takaori6, Takeyuki Misawa7, Tamotsu Kuroki8, Manabu Kawai9, Takanori Morikawa10, Hiroki Yamaue9, Minoru Tanabe5, Yiping Mou11, Woo-Jung Lee12, Shailesh V Shrikhande13, Claudius Conrad14, Ho-Seong Han15, Chung Ngai Tang16, Chinnusamy Palanivelu17, David A Kooby18, Horacio J Asbun19, Go Wakabayashi20, Akihiko Tsuchida1, Tadahiro Takada21, Masakazu Yamamoto22, Masafumi Nakamura4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) requires sufficient laparoscopic training for optimal outcomes. Our aim is to determine the learning curve and investigate the factors influencing surgical outcomes during the learning curve.
METHODS: We analyzed surgical results of 150 consecutive cases of LPD performed by three hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons during their 50 first cases. Learning curves were constructed by cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis. Preoperative factors influencing resection time and blood loss were investigated in the introductory and stable periods. RESULTS : The learning curve could be divided into three phases: initial (1-20 cases), plateau (21-30), and stable (31-50). Resection time with lymph node dissection was significantly longer during the introductory period (initial and plateau periods) (P < 0.01) but not the stable phase (P = 0.51). Multivariate analysis revealed that patients with pancreatitis had longer resection times and massive blood loss in both the introductory and stable periods (stable phase). High visceral fat area was also significantly related to massive blood loss in the introductory period (P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Hepatopancreatobiliary surgeons need more than 30 cases until LPD becomes stable. Lymph node dissection and patients with high visceral fat area and concomitant pancreatitis should be avoided during the introductory period of the learning curve.
© 2018 Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Laparoscopy; Learning curve; Minimally invasive surgical procedures; Pancreaticoduodenectomy; Pancreatitis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30291768     DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.586

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci        ISSN: 1868-6974            Impact factor:   7.027


  15 in total

1.  What's the next step in evaluating laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy?

Authors:  Fernando Burdío; Luís Grande; Ignasi Poves
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 7.293

2.  Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Outcomes and Experience of 550 Patients in a Single Institution.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Yunqiang Cai; Jingwen Jiang; Bing Peng
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy in elderly patients.

Authors:  Yun Liang; Liting Zhao; Chongyi Jiang; Pengfei Hu; Hongwei Wang; Zhiwei Cai; Wei Wang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Combination of anterior superior mesenteric vein-first and right posterior superior mesenteric artery-first approaches for uncinate process dissection in minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Ronggui Lin; Xianchao Lin; Fengchun Lu; Yuanyuan Yang; Congfei Wang; Haizong Fang; Shi Wen; Yanchang Chen; Heguang Huang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-10

Review 5.  International expert consensus on laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Renyi Qin; Michael L Kendrick; Christopher L Wolfgang; Barish H Edil; Chinnusamy Palanivelu; Rowan W Parks; Yinmo Yang; Jin He; Taiping Zhang; Yiping Mou; Xianjun Yu; Bing Peng; Palanisamy Senthilnathan; Ho-Seong Han; Jae Hoon Lee; Michiaki Unno; Steven W M Olde Damink; Virinder Kumar Bansal; Pierce Chow; Tan To Cheung; Nim Choi; Yu-Wen Tien; Chengfeng Wang; Manson Fok; Xiujun Cai; Shengquan Zou; Shuyou Peng; Yupei Zhao
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 7.293

6.  Perioperative and short-term oncological outcomes following laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy after learning curve in the past 10 years: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qingbo Feng; Zechang Xin; Bo Zhu; Mingheng Liao; Wenwei Liao; Yong Zeng
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-05

7.  Learning curve of three European centers in laparoscopic, hybrid laparoscopic, and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy.

Authors:  Pavel Tyutyunnik; Sjors Klompmaker; Carlo Lombardo; Hryhoriy Lapshyn; Francesca Menonna; Niccolò Napoli; Ulrich Wellner; Roman Izrailov; Magomet Baychorov; Mark G Besselink; Moh'd Abu Hilal; Abe Fingerhut; Ugo Boggi; Tobias Keck; Igor Khatkov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Totally Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Comparison Between Early and Late Phase of an Initial Single-Center Learning Curve.

Authors:  Michele Mazzola; Alessandro Giani; Jacopo Crippa; Lorenzo Morini; Andrea Zironda; Camillo Leonardo Bertoglio; Paolo De Martini; Carmelo Magistro; Giovanni Ferrari
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-08-16

9.  The effectiveness, risks and improvement of laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy during the learning curve: a propensity score-matched analysis.

Authors:  Long Huang; Yifeng Tian; Jiayi Wu; Maolin Yan; Funan Qiu; Songqiang Zhou; Yannan Bai; Zhide Lai; Yaodong Wang; Shi Chen
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2020-08

10.  Improved outcomes with minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy in patients with dilated pancreatic ducts: a prospective study.

Authors:  Heidy Cos; Michael T LeCompte; Sanket Srinivasa; Jorge Zarate Rodriguez; Cheryl A Woolsey; Gregory Williams; Siddarth Patel; Adeel Khan; Ryan C Fields; Maria B Majella Doyle; William C Chapman; Steven M Strasberg; William G Hawkins; Chet W Hammill; Dominic E Sanford
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 3.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.