Literature DB >> 3029168

Efficiency of immunofluorescence for rapid detection of common respiratory viruses.

C G Ray, L L Minnich.   

Abstract

Rapid immunofluorescence (FA) methods for the detection of common respiratory viruses were compared with culture results over a 3-year period to assess the relative efficiency of FA in a clinical laboratory setting. For respiratory syncytial virus, efficiencies were high (sensitivity, 90 to 95%; specificity, 92 to 95%). The sensitivity of FA for detection of parainfluenza virus type 1, parainfluenza virus type 3, influenza A virus, and adenoviruses ranged from 28 to 63%, but specificities for these viruses were uniformly 98 to 100%. The observations form a basis for consideration of selective reduction of routine culture procedures for specimens with initial positive rapid FA results; however, the possibility of dual viral infection in some situations must also be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3029168      PMCID: PMC265899          DOI: 10.1128/jcm.25.2.355-357.1987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  9 in total

1.  Isolation of viruses from specimens submitted for direct immunofluorescence test for respiratory syncytial virus.

Authors:  J L Waner; N J Whitehurst; S Jonas; L Wall; H Shalaby
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Monoclonal antibodies for the rapid diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus infection by immunofluorescence.

Authors:  C L Kao; K McIntosh; B Fernie; A Talis; L Pierik; L Anderson
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 2.803

3.  Detection of adenovirus in nasopharyngeal specimens by radioactive and nonradioactive DNA probes.

Authors:  T Hyypiä
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of direct and indirect immunofluorescence staining of clinical specimens for detection of respiratory syncytial virus antigen.

Authors:  L L Minnich; C G Ray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Monoclonal antibodies for the rapid diagnosis of influenza A and B virus infections by immunofluorescence.

Authors:  J McQuillin; C R Madeley; A P Kendal
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1985-10-26       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Clinical evaluation of radioimmunoassay of nasopharyngeal secretions and serology for diagnosis of viral infections in children hospitalized for respiratory infections.

Authors:  T Vesikari; A L Kuusela; H K Sarkkinen; P E Halonen
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec

7.  Rapid diagnosis of parainfluenza virus infection in children.

Authors:  D T Wong; R C Welliver; K R Riddlesberger; M S Sun; P L Ogra
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of washed nasopharyngeal cells and whole nasal secretions for detection of respiratory syncytial virus antigens by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  R M Hendry; L T Pierik; K McIntosh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Comparison of direct immunofluorescent staining of clinical specimens for respiratory virus antigens with conventional isolation techniques.

Authors:  L Minnich; C G Ray
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 5.948

  9 in total
  29 in total

1.  Comparison of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, indirect immunofluorescence assay, and virus isolation for detection of respiratory viruses in nasopharyngeal secretions.

Authors:  S Takimoto; M Grandien; M A Ishida; M S Pereira; T M Paiva; T Ishimaru; E M Makita; C H Martinez
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Role of cell culture for virus detection in the age of technology.

Authors:  Diane S Leland; Christine C Ginocchio
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Immunologic tests in the diagnosis of pulmonary infection.

Authors:  E Goldstein; J Koo
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy       Date:  1990 Summer-Fall

4.  Discrepancy between results of a commercial enzyme immunoassay kit and immunofluorescence staining for detection of respiratory syncytial virus antigen.

Authors:  E Holter; T G Abrahamsen; G Rød; E Holten
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Use of fluorescent-antibody staining of cytocentrifuge-prepared smears in combination with cell culture for direct detection of respiratory viruses.

Authors:  K M Doing; M A Jerkofsky; E G Dow; J A Jellison
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of directigen RSV with viral isolation and direct immunofluorescence for the identification of respiratory syncytial virus.

Authors:  J L Waner; N J Whitehurst; S J Todd; H Shalaby; L V Wall
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Rapid viral diagnosis in perspective.

Authors:  P C Lee; P Hallsworth
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-06-02

Review 8.  Management of respiratory viral infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients and patients with hematologic malignancies.

Authors:  Roy F Chemaly; Dimpy P Shah; Michael J Boeckh
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Management of respiratory viral infections in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.

Authors:  Dimpy P Shah; Shashank S Ghantoji; Victor E Mulanovich; Ella J Ariza-Heredia; Roy F Chemaly
Journal:  Am J Blood Res       Date:  2012-11-25

10.  Comparison of rapid diagnostic techniques for respiratory syncytial and influenza A virus respiratory infections in young children.

Authors:  E A Dominguez; L H Taber; R B Couch
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.