Deanna R Befus1, Megan Bennett Irby2, Remy R Coeytaux3, Donald B Penzien4. 1. Center for Integrative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. dbefus@wakehealth.edu. 2. Program in Community Engagement, Clinical and Translational Science Institute, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. 3. Center for Integrative Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA. 4. Departments of Anesthesiology and Neurology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite recognition of rising prevalence and significant burden, migraine remains underestimated, underdiagnosed, and undertreated. This is especially true among groups who have been historically, socially, and economically marginalized such as communities of color, women, people experiencing poverty, people with lower levels of education, and people who hold more than one of these marginalized identities. While there is growing public and professional interest in disparities in migraine prevalence, there is a paucity of research focusing on racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities, and the social and structural determinants of health and equity that perpetuate these disparities. From a health equity perspective, migraine research and treatment require an examination not only of biological and behavioral factors, but of these identities and underlying, intersecting social and structural determinants of health. RECENT FINDINGS: Significant disparities in migraine incidence, prevalence, migraine-related pain and disability, access to care, and quality of care persist among marginalized and underserved groups: African Americans, Hispanics, people experiencing poverty, un- or under-employment, the un- and under-insured, people who have been exposed to stressful and traumatic events across the lifespan, and people experiencing multiple, overlapping marginalized identities. These same groups are largely underrepresented in migraine research, despite bearing disproportionate burden. Current approaches to understanding health disparities in migraine largely assume an essentializing approach, i.e., documenting differences between single identity groups-e.g., race or income or education level-rather than considering the mechanisms of disparities: the social and structural determinants of health. While disparities in migraine are becoming more widely acknowledged, we assert that migraine is more aptly understood as a health equity issue, that is, a condition in which many of the health disparities are avoidable. It is important in research and clinical practice to consider perspectives that incorporate a cultural understanding of racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic identity within and across all levels of society. Incorporating perspectives of intersectionality provides a strong foundation for understanding the role of these complex combination of factors on migraine pain and treatment. We urge the adoption of intersectional and systems perspectives in research, clinical practice, and policy to examine (1) interplay of race, gender, and social location as key factors in understanding, diagnosing, and treating migraine, and (2) the complex configurations of social and structural determinants of health that interact to produce health inequities in migraine care. An intentional research and clinical focus on these factors stands to improve how migraine is identified, documented, and treated among marginalized populations.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Despite recognition of rising prevalence and significant burden, migraine remains underestimated, underdiagnosed, and undertreated. This is especially true among groups who have been historically, socially, and economically marginalized such as communities of color, women, people experiencing poverty, people with lower levels of education, and people who hold more than one of these marginalized identities. While there is growing public and professional interest in disparities in migraine prevalence, there is a paucity of research focusing on racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities, and the social and structural determinants of health and equity that perpetuate these disparities. From a health equity perspective, migraine research and treatment require an examination not only of biological and behavioral factors, but of these identities and underlying, intersecting social and structural determinants of health. RECENT FINDINGS: Significant disparities in migraine incidence, prevalence, migraine-related pain and disability, access to care, and quality of care persist among marginalized and underserved groups: African Americans, Hispanics, people experiencing poverty, un- or under-employment, the un- and under-insured, people who have been exposed to stressful and traumatic events across the lifespan, and people experiencing multiple, overlapping marginalized identities. These same groups are largely underrepresented in migraine research, despite bearing disproportionate burden. Current approaches to understanding health disparities in migraine largely assume an essentializing approach, i.e., documenting differences between single identity groups-e.g., race or income or education level-rather than considering the mechanisms of disparities: the social and structural determinants of health. While disparities in migraine are becoming more widely acknowledged, we assert that migraine is more aptly understood as a health equity issue, that is, a condition in which many of the health disparities are avoidable. It is important in research and clinical practice to consider perspectives that incorporate a cultural understanding of racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic identity within and across all levels of society. Incorporating perspectives of intersectionality provides a strong foundation for understanding the role of these complex combination of factors on migraine pain and treatment. We urge the adoption of intersectional and systems perspectives in research, clinical practice, and policy to examine (1) interplay of race, gender, and social location as key factors in understanding, diagnosing, and treating migraine, and (2) the complex configurations of social and structural determinants of health that interact to produce health inequities in migraine care. An intentional research and clinical focus on these factors stands to improve how migraine is identified, documented, and treated among marginalized populations.
Entities:
Keywords:
Health disparity; Health equity; Intersectionality; Migraine
Authors: Allison M Schafer; Jeanetta C Rains; Donald B Penzien; Leanne Groban; Todd A Smitherman; Timothy T Houle Journal: Headache Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 5.887
Authors: Werner J Becker; Ted Findlay; Carmen Moga; N Ann Scott; Christa Harstall; Paul Taenzer Journal: Can Fam Physician Date: 2015-08 Impact factor: 3.275
Authors: Dawn C Buse; Elizabeth W Loder; Jennifer A Gorman; Walter F Stewart; Michael L Reed; Kristina M Fanning; Daniel Serrano; Richard B Lipton Journal: Headache Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 5.887
Authors: Nicole Rosendale; Elan L Guterman; Juno Obedin-Maliver; Annesa Flentje; Matthew R Capriotti; Micah E Lubensky; Mitchell R Lunn Journal: Neurology Date: 2022-07-11 Impact factor: 11.800
Authors: Lise Dassieu; Manon Choinière; Laurence Saint-Jean; Fiona Webster; Philip Peng; Norm Buckley; Ian Gilron; Owen Williamson; G Allen Finley; Krista Baerg; Audrée Janelle-Montcalm; Maria Hudspith; Aline Boulanger; Tania Di Renna; Howard Intrater; Brenda Lau; John Pereira Journal: Can J Anaesth Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 6.713
Authors: Deanna R Befus; Sharon Hull; Justine Strand de Oliveira; Gillian Sanders Schmidler; Morris Weinberger; Remy R Coeytaux Journal: Glob Adv Health Med Date: 2019-06-13
Authors: Donna Langenbahn; Yuka Matsuzawa; Yuen Shan Christine Lee; Felicia Fraser; Donald B Penzien; Naomi M Simon; Richard B Lipton; Mia T Minen Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 5.128