| Literature DB >> 30291307 |
Yanbo Yu1,2, Genxiang Mao3, Jirong Wang3, Liyue Zhu3, Xiaoling Lv3, Qian Tong3, Yefei Fang1, Yinxiang Lv4, Guofu Wang5,6.
Abstract
Hypertension is a global health issue, and a reduced exercise capacity is unavoidable for older people. According to recent clinical studies, the intestinal microbiota play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of many human diseases. We investigated whether specific alterations in the gut microbiota contribute to the reduced exercise capacity of elderly patients with hypertension. This study enrolled 56 subjects, and all patients performed a cardiopulmonary exercise test and underwent fecal bacteria sequencing (16 s ribosomal RNA V4 region). According to peak oxygen uptake values, patients were divided into three groups (Weber A = 19, Weber B = 20, and Weber C = 17). The alpha diversity was not significantly different among the three groups. Regarding the beta diversity, Weber A samples were separate from the other two groups in the nonmetric multidimensional scaling ordination plot (ANOSIM pairwise comparisons generated an R > 0.5; p < 0.05). The abundance of Betaproteobacteria, Burkholderiales, Alcaligenaceae, Faecalibacterium and Ruminococcaceae was diminished in subjects with a reduced exercise capacity (LDA score > 4.0). Escherichia coli are a primary producer of trimethylamine and inflammation in the human gut, and the abundance of this bacteria was increased in patients with a reduced exercise capacity (LDA score > 4.0). On the other hand, Lachnospiraceae-Eubacterium_hallii_group, Lachnospiraceae-Lachnoclostridium, Lachnospiraceae-Blautia-Ruminococcus_sp__5_1_39BFAA, and Ruminococcaceae-Faecalibacterium belong to the order Clostridiales that are likely to produce short-chain fatty acids (LDA score > 4.0), and some of these species were enriched in the Weber B or Weber C group in multiple comparisons. Our data pointed to an altered gut microbiota as a potential contributor to the pathogenesis and progression of the reduced exercise capacity of elderly patients with hypertension.Entities:
Keywords: 16 s rRNA; Elderly patient; Exercise capacity; Gut microbiome; Hypertension
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30291307 PMCID: PMC8076014 DOI: 10.1038/s41440-018-0110-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hypertens Res ISSN: 0916-9636 Impact factor: 3.872
Demographic, clinical and functional characteristics of patients
| Weber A ( | Weber B ( | Weber C ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 71.79 ± 1.39 | 73.5 ± 1.39 | 75.63 ± 1.10 | 0.15 |
| Female sex (%) | 26.3 | 40 | 64.7 | 0.064 |
| BMI (kg/m²) | 23.58 ± 0.56 | 24.69 ± 0.69 | 24.80 ± 0.91 | 0.413 |
| Peak VO2/Kg (ml/kg/min) | 22.17 ± 0.51* † | 18.32 ± 0.25† | 14.24 ± 0.32 | <0.001 |
| VO2/Kg at AT (ml/kg/min) | 16.82 ± 0.66* † | 13.98 ± 0.54† | 10.71 ± 0.58 | <0.001 |
| VTmax (L) | 1.53 ± 0.06 † | 1.4 ± 0.05† | 1.09 ± 0.06 | <0.001 |
| SBP (mmHg) | 152 [128–66] | 145.5 [130.25–55.50] | 141 [133.25–71.25] | 0.38 |
| DBP (mmHg) | 80.68 ± 2.47 | 78.90 ± 2.45 | 79.50 ± 2.31 | 0.864 |
| HRmax (bpm) | 126.79 ± 3.58 | 123.7 ± 3.24 | 116.71 ± 5.40 | 0.23 |
| BUN (mmol/L) | 4.49 [3.85–5.54] | 4.76[4.20–5.10] | 4.52[4.18–6.20] | 0.756 |
| Scr (μmol/L) | 70.35 ± 3.26 | 73.28 ± 3.80 | 69.15 ± 4.31 | 0.729 |
| AST (IU/l) | 23.10 [19.90–28.30] | 25.05 [19.93–27.55] | 22.60 [19.05–29.9] | 0.955 |
| ALT (IU/l) | 17.50 [13.10–26.40] | 15.40 [11.75–20.53] | 16.90 [11.60–27.00] | 0.375 |
| CRP, mg/L nv 0–3 mg/L | 0.48 [0.31–83] † | 0.81 [0.51–1.96] | 1.38 [0.76–3.16] | 0.004 |
| LDL-C (mmol/L) | 2.34 ± 0.75 | 2.15 ± 0.83 | 2.58 ± 0.80 | 0.929 |
| HDL-C (mmol/L) | 1.26 ± 0.21 | 1.35 ± 0.43 | 1.30 ± 0.34 | 0.934 |
| TC (mmol/L) | 4.19 ± 0.21 | 4.06 ± 0.23 | 4.52 ± 0.22 | 0.926 |
| TG (mmol/L) | 1.19 [0.90–1.59] | 1.02[0.83–2.05] | 1.50 [0.95–2.06] | 0.253 |
| FINS (mg/dL) | 67.05 [48.38–80.34] | 61.98 [43.94–89.06] | 76.76 [38.78–125.05] | 0.844 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 5.31 [4.59–6.57] | 5.41 [4.89–5.85] | 5.37 [5.13–5.88] | 0.879 |
| HbA1c (%) | 6.20 [5.80–6.80] | 6.00 [5.75–6.58] | 6.20 [5.85–6.60] | 0.777 |
| DM type II (%) | 42.1 | 10 | 17.6 | 0.048 |
BMI body mass index, Peak VO2 peak oxygen uptake, AT anaerobic threshold, VT tidal volume, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, HR heart rate, BUN blood urea nitrogen, Scr serum creatinine, AST aspartate transaminase, ALT alanine transaminase, CRP C-reactive protein, LDL-C low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TC total cholesterol, TG total triglyceride, FINS fasting insulin, FBG fasting blood glucose, HbA1c hemoglobin A1C, DM type II diabetes mellitus type 2, SEM standard error of mean, IQR interquartile range, Values are % mean ± SEM or median (IQR)
*, † P < 0.05 compared with the Weber B and Weber C, respectively
Fig. 1a Relative abundances of the top 10 phyla by composition in individual samples. b Relative abundances of the top 10 phyla by composition in the three groups. c The abundances of the top 35 bacteria at the genus level in each group are shown. The heat map is color-coded based on row Z-scores. The groups with the highest and lowest bacterial abundances are shown in red and blue, respectively
Fig. 2Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination plot of the Weber A, Weber B, and Weber C samples. Ordination was based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity calculated with OTU-level data. Each point represents one sample; the closer the points are located to one another, the more similar the microbiome compositions of the samples
Fig. 3A LefSe analysis along with linear discriminate analysis (LDA) was applied to identify indicator bacterial in the groups. a Weber A vs. Weber B vs. Weber C, (b) Weber A vs. Weber B, (c) Weber A vs. Weber C, (d) Weber A vs. Weber B + C and (e) Weber B vs. Weber C
Correlation analysis of clinical values and the relative abundance of core gut microbiota
| o_Lactobacillales | f_Alcaligenaceae | g_Eubacterium_hallii_group | g_Blautia | g_Faecalibacterium | g_Lachnoclostridium | g_Ruminococcus_2 | s_Ruminococcus_sp._5_1_39BFAA | s_Escherichia_coli | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBG |
| 0.553** | −0.149 | 0.260 | 0.249 | −0.067 | 0.119 | 0.089 | 0.249 | 0.110 |
|
| 0.000 | 0.273 | 0.053 | 0.064 | 0.622 | 0.384 | 0.515 | 0.064 | 0.420 | |
| BUN |
| 0.109 | −0.225 | 0.281* | 0.297* | −0.309* | −0.027 | 0.277* | 0.312* | 0.239 |
|
| 0.426 | 0.095 | 0.036 | 0.026 | 0.021 | 0.842 | 0.039 | 0.019 | 0.076 | |
| Scr |
| −0.011 | −0.111 | 0.121 | 0.085 | −0.137 | 0.030 | 0.320* | 0.106 | 0.061 |
|
| 0.934 | 0.415 | 0.373 | 0.533 | 0.313 | 0.825 | 0.016 | 0.436 | 0.653 | |
| CRP |
| 0.385** | −0.294* | 0.296* | 0.268* | −0.126 | −0.048 | 0.018 | 0.245 | 0.148 |
|
| 0.003 | 0.028 | 0.027 | 0.046 | 0.355 | 0.726 | 0.895 | 0.068 | 0.276 | |
| HbA1c |
| 0.325* | −0.121 | 0.086 | 0.101 | 0.015 | 0.047 | −0.115 | 0.103 | -0.025 |
|
| 0.015 | 0.373 | 0.526 | 0.457 | 0.910 | 0.729 | 0.399 | 0.448 | 0.855 | |
| Peak VO2/Kg |
| −0.284* | 0.318* | −0.263 | −0.290* | 0.159 | −0.143 | −0.182 | -0.273* | -0.355** |
|
| 0.034 | 0.017 | 0.050 | 0.030 | 0.241 | 0.293 | 0.181 | 0.042 | 0.007 | |
| VO2/Kg at AT |
| 0.004 | 0.114 | −0.123 | −0.112 | 0.067 | −0.050 | −0.023 | -0.068 | -0.364** |
|
| 0.975 | 0.404 | 0.366 | 0.412 | 0.623 | 0.714 | 0.868 | 0.621 | 0.006 | |
| BMI |
| 0.371** | −0.249 | 0.273* | 0.242 | −0.099 | 0.065 | 0.212 | 0.273* | 0.123 |
|
| 0.005 | 0.066 | 0.044 | 0.074 | 0.474 | 0.637 | 0.120 | 0.044 | 0.373 | |
| SBP |
| −0.128 | −0.073 | −0.023 | −0.003 | 0.136 | 0.158 | −0.010 | 0.009 | -0.253 |
|
| 0.353 | 0.598 | 0.869 | 0.982 | 0.322 | 0.248 | 0.942 | 0.947 | 0.063 | |
| DBP |
| −0.050 | 0.048 | −0.130 | −0.051 | 0.014 | 0.038 | −0.132 | -0.035 | -0.080 |
|
| 0.718 | 0.726 | 0.345 | 0.713 | 0.922 | 0.784 | 0.338 | 0.802 | 0.562 | |
| Age |
| 0.180 | −0.119 | 0.085 | 0.070 | 0.001 | 0.268* | 0.221 | 0.110 | 0.064 |
|
| 0.185 | 0.382 | 0.533 | 0.608 | 0.992 | 0.046 | 0.101 | 0.418 | 0.640 |
Note: Spearman rank correlation was used to evaluate statistical importance: r: correlation coefficient
FBG fasting blood glucose, BUN blood urea nitrogen, Scr serum creatinine, CRP C-reactive protein, HbA1c hemoglobin A1C, Peak VO2 peak oxygen uptake, AT anaerobic threshold, BMI body mass index, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01